Literature DB >> 20033734

Using external magnet guidance and endoscopically placed magnets to create suture-free gastro-enteral anastomoses.

Christopher Myers1, Benjamin Yellen, John Evans, Eric DeMaria, Aurora Pryor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To facilitate endolumenal and natural orifice procedures, this study evaluated a novel technique using external and endoscopically placed magnets to create suture-free gastroenteral anastomoses.
METHODS: Seven anesthetized adult swine underwent endoscopic placement of magnets into the small bowel and stomach. Using external magnets, the endoscopically placed internal magnets were brought into opposition under endoscopic view. After 1-2 weeks, the pigs were killed and analyzed. At laparotomy and under sterile conditions, peritoneal cultures were obtained. The anastomoses were evaluated endoscopically and tested using an air insufflation test. Finally, the anastomoses were resected and evaluated microscopically.
RESULTS: The average operative time for endoscopic placement of the magnets was 34.3 +/- 14.8 min. Successful placement and creation of anastomoses occurred in six of the pigs. One pig did not form an anastomosis because the magnets were too large to pass through the pylorus at the time of attempted magnet placement. Six swine experienced uncomplicated postoperative courses. One pig's postoperative course involved constipation for several days, requiring additional fluids and fiber supplementation. The findings at endoscopy showed that the magnets were adhered to the anastomosis, which were easily freed, or within the stomach. The air insufflation test results were negative for all the pigs. At laparotomy, there was no evidence of infection, abscess, or leak, but two peritoneal culture results were positive with scant growth of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococcus, presumably contaminants. Microscopically, the anastomoses illustrated granulation and fibrous connective tissue without evidence of infection or leak.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopically placed magnets with external magnet guidance is a feasible and novel approach to creating patent gastroenteral anastomoses without abdominal incisions or sutures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20033734     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0735-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  Ingested magnets and gastrointestinal complications.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M Alzahem; Soundappan S V Soundappan; Heather Jefferies; Daniel T Cass
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.954

2.  VI. The Relative Value of the Murphy Button and Absorbable Plates in Intestinal Anastomosis.

Authors:  R H Dawbarn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1895-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Side-to-side sutureless vascular anastomosis with magnets.

Authors:  Detlev Erdmann; Ranya Sweis; Christoph Heitmann; Koji Yasui; Kevin C Olbrich; L Scott Levin; A Adam Sharkawy; Bruce Klitzman
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Magnetic compression biliary-enteric anastomosis for palliation of obstructive jaundice: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Michael Avaliani; Nikolay Chigogidze; Andrei Nechipai; Boris Dolgushin
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Laparoscopic retrieval of "stubborn" foreign bodies in the foregut: a case report and literature survey.

Authors:  Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Muthukumaran Rangarajan; Subbiah Rajapandian; Sai Krishna Vittal; Gobi Shanmugham Maheshkumaar
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.719

6.  Nonsurgical policy for treatment of bilioenteric anastomotic stricture after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Atsuyoshi Mita; Yasuhiko Hashikura; Yuichi Masuda; Yasunari Ohno; Koichi Urata; Yuichi Nakazawa; Toshihiko Ikegami; Masaru Terada; Hironori Yamamoto; Shin-Ichi Miyagawa
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 3.782

7.  Creation of compression gastroenterostomy by means of the oral, percutaneous, or surgical introduction of magnets: feasibility study in swine.

Authors:  C Cope
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 8.  Compression anastomosis: history and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Orit Kaidar-Person; Raul J Rosenthal; Steven D Wexner; Samuel Szomstein; Benjamin Person
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Multiple magnet ingestion as a source of severe gastrointestinal complications requiring surgical intervention.

Authors:  Sanjeev Dutta; Ario Barzin
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2008-02

10.  Magnet induced perforated appendicitis and ileo-caecal fistula formation.

Authors:  Andrew J Robinson; Janne Bingham; Ronald L E Thompson
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2009-01
  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Utilisation of magnets to enhance gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Imdadur Rahman; Praful Patel; Philip Boger; Mike Thomson; Nadeem Ahmad Afzal
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-12-25

2.  Magnetic compression gastrostomy in the rat.

Authors:  Ibrahim Uygun; Mehmet Hanifi Okur; Hasan Cimen; Aysenur Keles; Ozben Yalcin; Hayrettin Ozturk; Selcuk Otcu
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Hybrid fluorescent magnetic gastrojejunostomy: an experimental feasibility study in the porcine model and human cadaver.

Authors:  Ryohei Watanabe; Manuel Barberio; Shingo Kanaji; Alfonso Lapergola; Anila Hoskere Ashoka; Bohdan Andreiuk; Ludovica Guerriero; Margherita Pizzicannella; Barbara Seeliger; Yoshihisa Saida; Hironori Kaneko; Marc Worreth; Alend Saadi; Jacques Marescaux; Andrey S Klymchenko; Michele Diana
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Extrahepatic portacaval shunt via a magnetic compression technique: A cadaveric feasibility study.

Authors:  Xiao-Peng Yan; Wen-Yan Liu; Jia Ma; Jian-Peng Li; Yi Lv
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Gastrointestinal damage caused by swallowing multiple magnets.

Authors:  Shiqi Liu; Jianhui Li; Yi Lv
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Minimally invasive single-site surgery for the digestive system: A technological review.

Authors:  Parag W Dhumane; Michele Diana; Joel Leroy; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  Novel magnetic compression technique for establishment of a canine model of tracheoesophageal fistula.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Rong-Qian Wu; Yi Lv; Xiao-Peng Yan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Endoscopic Procedures for Weight Loss.

Authors:  Vitor Ottoboni Brunaldi; Manoel Galvao Neto
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2021-07-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.