| Literature DB >> 20033360 |
Nadia L Cerminara1, John A Rawson, Richard Apps.
Abstract
In the present study, a non-pulsatile arterially perfused hindbrain and upper body rat preparation is described which is an extension of the brainstem preparation reported by Potts et al., (Brain Res Bull 53(1):59-67), 1. The modified in situ preparation allows study of cerebellar function whilst preserving the integrity of many of its interconnections with the brainstem, upper spinal cord and the peripheral nervous system of the head and forelimbs. Evoked mossy fibre, climbing fibre and parallel fibre field potentials and EMG activity elicited in forelimb biceps muscle by interpositus stimulation provided evidence that both cerebellar inputs and outputs remain operational in this preparation. Similarly, the spontaneous and evoked single unit activity of Purkinje cells, putative Golgi cells, molecular interneurones and cerebellar nuclear neurones was similar to activity patterns reported in vivo. The advantages of the preparation include the ability to record, without the complications of anaesthesia, stabile single unit activity for extended periods (3 h or more), from regions of the rat cerebellum that are difficult to access in vivo. The preparation should therefore be a useful adjunct to in vitro and in vivo studies of neural circuits underlying cerebellar contributions to movement control and motor learning.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20033360 PMCID: PMC2866334 DOI: 10.1007/s12311-009-0152-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cerebellum ISSN: 1473-4222 Impact factor: 3.847
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of the perfused hindbrain and upper body preparation of the rat. The chamber is constructed from Perspex and held in place on a steel table with magnetic feet. The rat is decerebrated and perfused with a modified Ringer's solution gassed with 95% O2/5%CO2 mixture via a double lumen cannula inserted into the descending aorta. Perfusion pressure (PP) is monitored via the second lumen of the cannula. The rat is held in place with ear and nose bars. A peristaltic pump is used to circulate the perfusate. Two drain holes in the bottom of the chamber return the perfusate efflux to the perfusate reservoir for reperfusion. Tygon tubing is used to connect the circuitry. Arrows indicate the direction of perfusate flow. The flow rate of the perfusate was altered until phrenic nerve activity (PNA) monitored via a suction electrode displayed a eupneic (ramp-like) pattern. PNA was integrated to show more clearly the rhythmic activity consistent with eupnoea. Extra- and intracellular recordings were made from individual cerebellar neurones. Electrical stimulation of the brachial plexus or cerebellar cortex was used to evoke cerebellar field potentials. Forelimb muscle contraction evoked by microstimulation of nucleus interpositus was monitored by EMG recordings from the ipsilateral biceps brachii muscle. See “Methods” for further details
Fig. 2Evoked cerebellar cortical field potentials. a Field potential elicited by parallel fibre stimulation and recorded ‘on beam’ in the molecular layer of the cerebellar cortex. Depth of recording microelectrode from cortical surface = 100 μm. b Individual Purkinje cell response to parallel fibre stimulation. c Evoked field potentials in the molecular layer (top) and granular layer (bottom) in response to mossy fibre-parallel fibre activation. Field potentials are defined in accordance with Eccles et al., 1967b. d Climbing fibre field potential evoked in the C1 zone of the paramedian lobule after electrical stimulation of the brachial plexus at 3 T (T = 2.5 V, where T is defined as the stimulus which evokes a just detectable cerebellar response). e Graph shows the magnitude of the test response (expressed as a % of control) plotted as a function of different interstimulus intervals of the mossy fibre N3 wave in the experiment shown in c. f Same as e but for the climbing fibre field shown in d. In e and f, each value is an average of 14 trials (±SEM). Records a–d are an average of ten consecutive trials. Stimulus artifact indicated by arrowheads
Fig. 3EMG responses evoked by cerebellar nuclear microstimulation. a EMG response recorded in ipsilateral biceps brachii muscle evoked by single pulse stimulation of nucleus interpositus. Stimulus strength was 200 µA. Average of ten trials. Arrow indicates time of stimulus. b High-power photomicrograph of a cresyl violet-stained sagittal section of the cerebellum demonstrating the location of the stimulating electrode tip, indicated by an arrow, within NIA. NIA nucleaus interpositus anterior NIP nucleus interpositus posterior. Scale bar, 200 μm
Fig. 4Purkinje cell single unit recordings. a Recording from a Purkinje cell showing spontaneous complex (dot) and simple spike activity. Lower panel shows ten superimposed complex spikes (left hand panel) and simple spikes (right hand panel). bi Population histogram of mean firing rates of complex spikes (n = 25). bii Complex spike interspike interval distribution. biii Autocorrelogram of complex spike spontaneous activity. ci Simple spike interspike interval distribution. cii Population histogram of mean firing rates of simple spikes (n = 22). ciii Autocorrelogram of simple spike spontaneous activity. d Sample trace of an intracellular Purkinje cell recording at the level of the proximal dendrites. CV coefficient of variation
Firing properties of cerebellar neurones in the arterially perfused hindbrain and upper body rat preparation
| Cell type | Number | Spike width (ms) | Mean ISI (ms) | Firing rate (Hz) | CV of ISI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purkinje cells CS | 25 | 2540000 ± 509000 (784000–10444000) | 0.76 ± 0.20 (0.10–5.15) | 1.06 ± 0.09 (0.37–2.46) | |
| Purkinje cells SS | 22 | 0.96 ± 0.05 (0.39–1.35) | 28.84 ± 3.72 ms (13.73–69.53) | 42.56 ± 4.16 (11.33–75.88) | 0.96 ± 0.14 (0.26–3.19) |
| ML interneurons | 13 | 1.64 ± 0.11 (0.84–2.28) | 153.42 ± 45.19 ms (36.32–641.44) | 12.72 ± 2.34 (1.54–27.51) | 0.67 ± 0.09 (0.22–1.56) |
| Putative Golgi cells | 6 | 1.49 ± 0.09 (1.14–1.80) | 90.32 ± 20.00 ms (18.45–167.29) | 12.04 ± 3.34 (3.72–26.41) | 0.53 ± 0.11 (0.15–0.90) |
| Interpositus neurons | 6 | 1.08 ± 0.08 (0.80–1.35) | 39.70 ± 5.91 ms (25.13–59.43) | 28.61 ± 6.06 (13.07–48.99) | 1.07 ± 0.25 (0.41–1.94) |
Fig. 5Cerebellar cortical interneurones. (ai) Spontaneous activity of a molecular layer interneurone. Lower panel shows ten superimposed spikes at an expanded time base. (aii) Interspike interval distribution of molecular layer interneurone activity. (aiii) Population histogram of mean firing rates of molecular layer interneurones (n = 13) (aiv) Autocorrelogram of molecular layer interneurone spontaneous activity. (bi) Spontaneous activity of a putativeGolgi cell. Lower panel shows ten superimposed spikes at an expanded time base. (bii) Interspike interval distribution of Golgi cell activity. (biii) Population histogram of mean firing rates of Golgi cells (n = 6). (biv ) Autocorrelogram of Golgi cell spontaneous activity. CV coefficient of variation
Fig. 6Cerebellar nuclear neurones. a Spontaneous activity of a cerebellar interpositus neurone. Lower panel shows ten superimposed spikes at an expanded time base. b Interspike interval histogram of a cerebellar interpositus neurone. c Population histogram of mean firing rates of nuclear neurones (n = 6). d Autocorrelogram of spontaneous activity of nuclear neurone
Fig. 7Cerebellar neuronal responses to peripheral stimulation. a Peri-event time histogram of the activity of a cerebellar interpositus nuclear neurone in response to mechanical stimulation of the periorbital region. Period of mechanical stimulation is indicated by length of horizontal bar. b Peri-event time histogram of the simple spike activity of a Purkinje cell in response to electrical stimulation of the facial nerve. Stimulus onset = time 0. Bin size = 10 ms
Advantages and disadvantages of the PHBP preparation
| ADVANTAGES |
| Allows access to parts of rodent cerebellum not accessible in vivo (in both decerebrate and anaesthetised preparations), notably the anterior lobe. |
| Unlike in vitro preparations, the PHBP retains functional connectivity between the cerebellum, brainstem and the upper body and head (and can be modified to include the whole body if required) |
| The high mechanical stability combined with increased accessibility allows for long term recording/stimulation of multiple hindbrain sites |
| Avoids the complications of anaesthesia |
| Allows greater control over pharmacological manipulations as drugs can be rapidly introduced and washed out, and neurotoxins can be used that would be lethal in vivo |
| In contrast to in vitro preparations the PHBP allows the study of a range of different sensory modalities, including: cutaneous and proprioceptive pathways, and whisker sensory inputs to hindbrain circuits |
| The PHBP is quicker and easier to set up than in vitro preparations |
| DISADVANTAGES |
| The main limitation is that the PHBP is decerebrate. This will deprive the cerebellum of a major source of input. If required, anaesthesia can be used as an alternative to decerebration |
| Young age of rats (P45). However it should be noted that the animals are older than those frequently used in in vitro studies |
| Cerebellar anatomical landmarks are less clear as major blood vessels such as the paravermal vein are transparent. However, dye can be introduced into the perfusate to temporarily mark blood vessels |
| Viability is limited to about 5 h |
| Peripheral electrical stimulation and recording (e.g. of nerves) is more complicated than in vivo because of the perfusate; electrical contacts need to be made water tight |
| The thorax and upper forelimbs are usually skinned to prevent clogging of tubing/filters with hair and debris. This will alter sensory inputs but regions of skin of interest can be left intact e.g. the face (including whiskers) and distal forelimbs |