Literature DB >> 15579154

Feedback control of Purkinje cell activity by the cerebello-olivary pathway.

F Bengtsson1, P Svensson, G Hesslow.   

Abstract

The pathway from the deep cerebellar nuclei to the inferior olive, the source of the climbing fibre input to the cerebellum, inhibits olivary transmission. As climbing fibre activity can depress the background firing of the Purkinje cells, it was suggested that nucleo-olivary (N-O) inhibition is a negative feedback mechanism for regulating Purkinje cell excitability. This suggestion was investigated, in a set-up with decerebrate ferrets, both by blocking and by stimulating cerebellar output while recording Purkinje cell activity. Blocking the N-O pathway was followed by an increased climbing fibre activity and a dramatic reduction in simple spike firing. Stimulation of the N-O fibres depressed climbing fibre responses and caused an increase in simple spike firing. These results are taken as support for the feedback hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15579154     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03789.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  27 in total

1.  Multiple sites of extinction for a single learned response.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Functional relations of cerebellar modules of the cat.

Authors:  Kris M Horn; Milton Pong; Alan R Gibson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Purkinje cell activity during classical conditioning with different conditional stimuli explains central tenet of Rescorla–Wagner model [corrected].

Authors:  Anders Rasmussen; Riccardo Zucca; Fredrik Johansson; Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Lock-and-key mechanisms of cerebellar memory recall based on rebound currents.

Authors:  Daniel Z Wetmore; Eran A Mukamel; Mark J Schnitzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Cerebellar inhibition of inferior olivary transmission in the decerebrate ferret.

Authors:  P Svensson; F Bengtsson; G Hesslow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Number of spikes in climbing fibers determines the direction of cerebellar learning.

Authors:  Anders Rasmussen; Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Riccardo Zucca; Fredrik Johansson; Pär Svensson; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Local changes in the excitability of the cerebellar cortex produce spatially restricted changes in complex spike synchrony.

Authors:  Sarah P Marshall; Eric J Lang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Sensory prediction or motor control? Application of marr-albus type models of cerebellar function to classical conditioning.

Authors:  Nathan F Lepora; John Porrill; Christopher H Yeo; Paul Dean
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Oculopalatal tremor explained by a model of inferior olivary hypertrophy and cerebellar plasticity.

Authors:  Aasef G Shaikh; Simon Hong; Ke Liao; Jing Tian; David Solomon; David S Zee; R John Leigh; Lance M Optican
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Electrophysiological characterization of the cerebellum in the arterially perfused hindbrain and upper body of the rat.

Authors:  Nadia L Cerminara; John A Rawson; Richard Apps
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.