Literature DB >> 9193147

Salient anatomic features of the cortico-ponto-cerebellar pathway.

P Brodal1, J G Bjaalie.   

Abstract

Recent studies of the primate corticopontine projection show that the neocerebellum--in addition to connections from motor and sensory areas--receives connections from various association areas of the cerebral cortex, some of which are thought to be primarily engaged in cognitive tasks. The quantities of such connections in relation to those from more clearly motor-related parts of the cortex need to be more precisely determined, however. Furthermore, the anatomic data on origin of corticopontine fibers needs to be supplemented with physiological experiments to clarify their functional properties at the single-cell level. For example, nothing is known of the functional role of the large input from the cingulate gyrus, nor is the input from the posterior parietal cortex physiologically characterized. Finally, the scarcity of corticopontine connections from the prefrontal cortex in the monkey (and probably also in man) may not seem readily compatible with a prominent role of the neocerebellum in certain cognitive tasks. We discuss data--in particular from three-dimensional reconstructions--indicating that both corticopontine projects and pontocerebellar neurons are arranged in a lamellar pattern. Corticopontine and pontocerebellar lamellae have similar shapes and orientations but appear to differ in other respects. Corticopontine terminal fields are sharply delimited, apparently without gradual overlap between projections from different sites in the cortex, whereas pontocerebellar lamellae are more fuzzy and exhibit gradual overlap of neuronal populations projecting to different targets. In spite of the sharpness of the corticopontine projection, there may be many opportunities for convergence of inputs from different parts of the cortex. Thus, the wide divergence of corticopontine projections produces many sites of overlap, and extensive interfaces between different terminal fields enabling convergence of inputs onto each neuron. We suggest that the lamellar arrangement of corticopontine terminal fields and of pontocerebellar neurons serve to create diversity of pontocerebellar neuronal properties. Thus, each small part of the cerebellar cortex would receive a specific combination of messages from many different sites in the cerebral cortex. The spatial arrangement of cerebrocerebellar connections have to be understood both in terms of fairly simple large-scale, gradual topographic relationships and an apparently highly complex pattern of divergence and convergence. Developmental studies of corticopontine and of pontocerebellar projections together with three-dimensional reconstructions in adults suggest that the highly complex adult connectional pattern may be created by simple rules operating during development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9193147     DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)63367-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  44 in total

1.  Functional anatomy of nonvisual feedback loops during reaching: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  M Desmurget; H Gréa; J S Grethe; C Prablanc; G E Alexander; S T Grafton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Three-dimensional topography of corticopontine projections from rat barrel cortex: correlations with corticostriatal organization.

Authors:  T B Leergaard; K D Alloway; J J Mutic; J G Bjaalie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Movement-related discharge in the cerebellar nuclei persists after local injections of GABA(A) antagonists.

Authors:  R N Holdefer; J C Houk; L E Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Unraveling the cerebellar cortex: cytology and cellular physiology of large-sized interneurons in the granular layer.

Authors:  Frederik J Geurts; Erik De Schutter; Stéphane Dieudonné
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Cerebellar asymmetry in a pair of monozygotic handedness-discordant twins.

Authors:  Richard Ewald Rosch; Lisa Ronan; Lynn Cherkas; Jennifer Mary Gurd
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Visualization and segmentation of reciprocal cerebrocerebellar pathways in the healthy and injured brain.

Authors:  Nicole Law; Mark Greenberg; Eric Bouffet; Suzanne Laughlin; Michael D Taylor; David Malkin; Fang Liu; Iska Moxon-Emre; Nadia Scantlebury; Jovanka Skocic; Donald Mabbott
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  The cerebellum, cerebellar disorders, and cerebellar research--two centuries of discoveries.

Authors:  Mario Manto
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Cerebellar contribution to auditory feedback control of speech production: Evidence from patients with spinocerebellar ataxia.

Authors:  Weifeng Li; Jiajun Zhuang; Zhiqiang Guo; Jeffery A Jones; Zhiqin Xu; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Individual prediction of chronic motor outcome in the acute post-stroke stage: Behavioral parameters versus functional imaging.

Authors:  Anne K Rehme; Lukas J Volz; Delia-Lisa Feis; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Chronic electrical stimulation of the contralesional lateral cerebellar nucleus enhances recovery of motor function after cerebral ischemia in rats.

Authors:  Andre G Machado; Kenneth B Baker; Daniel Schuster; Robert S Butler; Ali Rezai
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.