Literature DB >> 20032146

Quantification of hepatic steatosis with 3-T MR imaging: validation in ob/ob mice.

Catherine D G Hines1, Huanzhou Yu, Ann Shimakawa, Charles A McKenzie, Thomas F Warner, Jean H Brittain, Scott B Reeder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To validate quantitative imaging techniques used to detect and measure steatosis with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in an ob/ob mouse model of hepatic steatosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The internal research animal and resource center approved this study. Twenty-eight male ob/ob mice in progressively increasing age groups underwent imaging and were subsequently sacrificed. Six ob/+ mice served as control animals. Fat fraction imaging was performed with a chemical shift-based water-fat separation method. The following three methods of conventional fat quantification were compared with imaging: lipid extraction and qualitative and quantitative histologic analysis. Fat fraction images were reconstructed with single- and multiple-peak spectral models of fat and with and without correction for T2* effects. Fat fraction measurements obtained with the different reconstruction methods were compared with the three methods of fat quantification, and linear regression analysis and two-sided and two-sample t tests were performed.
RESULTS: Lipid extraction and qualitative and quantitative histologic analysis were highly correlated with the results of fat fraction imaging (r(2) = 0.92, 0.87, 0.82, respectively). No significant differences were found between imaging measurements and lipid extraction (P = .06) or quantitative histologic (P = .07) measurements when multiple peaks of fat and T2* correction were included in image reconstruction. Reconstructions in which T2* correction, accurate spectral modeling, or both were excluded yielded lower agreement when compared with the results yielded by other techniques. Imaging measurements correlated particularly well with histologic grades in mice with low fat fractions (intercept, -1.0% +/-1.2 [standard deviation]).
CONCLUSION: MR imaging can be used to accurately quantify fat in vivo in an animal model of hepatic steatosis and may serve as a quantitative biomarker of hepatic steatosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20032146      PMCID: PMC2797651          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.09090131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  44 in total

1.  1H NMR spectroscopic evidence of interaction between ibuprofen and lipoproteins in human blood plasma.

Authors:  Yunhuang Yang; Guoyun Bai; Xu Zhang; Chaohui Ye; Maili Liu
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.365

2.  Multicoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least-squares estimation method.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Zhifei Wen; Huanzhou Yu; Angel R Pineda; Garry E Gold; Michael Markl; Norbert J Pelc
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Breath-hold water and fat imaging using a dual-echo two-point Dixon technique with an efficient and robust phase-correction algorithm.

Authors:  Jingfei Ma
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Animal models of steatosis.

Authors:  A Koteish; A M Diehl
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.115

5.  Association of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with insulin resistance.

Authors:  G Marchesini; M Brizi; A M Morselli-Labate; G Bianchi; E Bugianesi; A J McCullough; G Forlani; N Melchionda
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 6.  Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Brunt
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.115

Review 7.  The clinical features, diagnosis and natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Arthur J McCullough
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.126

Review 8.  Animal models of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Amin A Nanji
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.126

9.  Assessment of donor liver steatosis: pathologist or automated software?

Authors:  Hendrik Marsman; Takakazu Matsushita; Ross Dierkhising; Walter Kremers; Charles Rosen; Lawrence Burgart; Scott L Nyberg
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: diagnostic and fat-grading accuracy of low-flip-angle multiecho gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Takeshi Yokoo; Mark Bydder; Gavin Hamilton; Michael S Middleton; Anthony C Gamst; Tanya Wolfson; Tarek Hassanein; Heather M Patton; Joel E Lavine; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fat with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Irene Cruite; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging: Review of imaging techniques and overview of liver imaging.

Authors:  Santhi Maniam; Janio Szklaruk
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-08-28

3.  Measuring liver triglyceride content in mice: non-invasive magnetic resonance methods as an alternative to histopathology.

Authors:  Jurgen H Runge; Pieter J Bakker; Ingrid C Gaemers; Joanne Verheij; Theo B M Hakvoort; Roelof Ottenhoff; Aart J Nederveen; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Quantitative chemical shift-encoded MRI is an accurate method to quantify hepatic steatosis.

Authors:  Jens-Peter Kühn; Diego Hernando; Birger Mensel; Paul C Krüger; Till Ittermann; Julia Mayerle; Norbert Hosten; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Quantification of liver fat in mice: comparing dual-echo Dixon imaging, chemical shift imaging, and 1H-MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Xin-Gui Peng; Shenghong Ju; Yujiao Qin; Fang Fang; Xin Cui; George Liu; Yicheng Ni; Gao-Jun Teng
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 5.922

6.  Quantitative assessment of fat infiltration in the rotator cuff muscles using water-fat MRI.

Authors:  Lorenzo Nardo; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Drew A Lansdown; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Sonia Lee; Roberto Maroldi; C Benjamin Ma; Thomas M Link; Roland Krug
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Reproducibility of MR-based liver fat quantification across field strength: Same-day comparison between 1.5T and 3T in obese subjects.

Authors:  Nathan S Artz; William M Haufe; Catherine A Hooker; Gavin Hamilton; Tanya Wolfson; Guilherme M Campos; Anthony C Gamst; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  T(1) independent, T(2) (*) corrected chemical shift based fat-water separation with multi-peak fat spectral modeling is an accurate and precise measure of hepatic steatosis.

Authors:  Catherine D G Hines; Alex Frydrychowicz; Gavin Hamilton; Dana L Tudorascu; Karl K Vigen; Huanzhou Yu; Charles A McKenzie; Claude B Sirlin; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis.

Authors:  An Tang; Justin Tan; Mark Sun; Gavin Hamilton; Mark Bydder; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Michael Middleton; Elizabeth M Brunt; Rohit Loomba; Joel E Lavine; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Quantification of liver proton-density fat fraction in 7.1T preclinical MR systems: Impact of the fitting technique.

Authors:  Christoph Mahlke; Diego Hernando; Christina Jahn; Antonio Cigliano; Till Ittermann; Anne Mössler; Marie-Luise Kromrey; Grazyna Domaska; Scott B Reeder; Jens-Peter Kühn
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.