PURPOSE: To validate quantitative imaging techniques used to detect and measure steatosis with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in an ob/ob mouse model of hepatic steatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The internal research animal and resource center approved this study. Twenty-eight male ob/ob mice in progressively increasing age groups underwent imaging and were subsequently sacrificed. Six ob/+ mice served as control animals. Fat fraction imaging was performed with a chemical shift-based water-fat separation method. The following three methods of conventional fat quantification were compared with imaging: lipid extraction and qualitative and quantitative histologic analysis. Fat fraction images were reconstructed with single- and multiple-peak spectral models of fat and with and without correction for T2* effects. Fat fraction measurements obtained with the different reconstruction methods were compared with the three methods of fat quantification, and linear regression analysis and two-sided and two-sample t tests were performed. RESULTS: Lipid extraction and qualitative and quantitative histologic analysis were highly correlated with the results of fat fraction imaging (r(2) = 0.92, 0.87, 0.82, respectively). No significant differences were found between imaging measurements and lipid extraction (P = .06) or quantitative histologic (P = .07) measurements when multiple peaks of fat and T2* correction were included in image reconstruction. Reconstructions in which T2* correction, accurate spectral modeling, or both were excluded yielded lower agreement when compared with the results yielded by other techniques. Imaging measurements correlated particularly well with histologic grades in mice with low fat fractions (intercept, -1.0% +/-1.2 [standard deviation]). CONCLUSION: MR imaging can be used to accurately quantify fat in vivo in an animal model of hepatic steatosis and may serve as a quantitative biomarker of hepatic steatosis.
PURPOSE: To validate quantitative imaging techniques used to detect and measure steatosis with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in an ob/ob mouse model of hepatic steatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The internal research animal and resource center approved this study. Twenty-eight male ob/ob mice in progressively increasing age groups underwent imaging and were subsequently sacrificed. Six ob/+ mice served as control animals. Fat fraction imaging was performed with a chemical shift-based water-fat separation method. The following three methods of conventional fat quantification were compared with imaging: lipid extraction and qualitative and quantitative histologic analysis. Fat fraction images were reconstructed with single- and multiple-peak spectral models of fat and with and without correction for T2* effects. Fat fraction measurements obtained with the different reconstruction methods were compared with the three methods of fat quantification, and linear regression analysis and two-sided and two-sample t tests were performed. RESULTS:Lipid extraction and qualitative and quantitative histologic analysis were highly correlated with the results of fat fraction imaging (r(2) = 0.92, 0.87, 0.82, respectively). No significant differences were found between imaging measurements and lipid extraction (P = .06) or quantitative histologic (P = .07) measurements when multiple peaks of fat and T2* correction were included in image reconstruction. Reconstructions in which T2* correction, accurate spectral modeling, or both were excluded yielded lower agreement when compared with the results yielded by other techniques. Imaging measurements correlated particularly well with histologic grades in mice with low fat fractions (intercept, -1.0% +/-1.2 [standard deviation]). CONCLUSION: MR imaging can be used to accurately quantify fat in vivo in an animal model of hepatic steatosis and may serve as a quantitative biomarker of hepatic steatosis.
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Zhifei Wen; Huanzhou Yu; Angel R Pineda; Garry E Gold; Michael Markl; Norbert J Pelc Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: G Marchesini; M Brizi; A M Morselli-Labate; G Bianchi; E Bugianesi; A J McCullough; G Forlani; N Melchionda Journal: Am J Med Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Hendrik Marsman; Takakazu Matsushita; Ross Dierkhising; Walter Kremers; Charles Rosen; Lawrence Burgart; Scott L Nyberg Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Takeshi Yokoo; Mark Bydder; Gavin Hamilton; Michael S Middleton; Anthony C Gamst; Tanya Wolfson; Tarek Hassanein; Heather M Patton; Joel E Lavine; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-02-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jurgen H Runge; Pieter J Bakker; Ingrid C Gaemers; Joanne Verheij; Theo B M Hakvoort; Roelof Ottenhoff; Aart J Nederveen; Jaap Stoker Journal: MAGMA Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Jens-Peter Kühn; Diego Hernando; Birger Mensel; Paul C Krüger; Till Ittermann; Julia Mayerle; Norbert Hosten; Scott B Reeder Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Lorenzo Nardo; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Drew A Lansdown; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Sonia Lee; Roberto Maroldi; C Benjamin Ma; Thomas M Link; Roland Krug Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-09-24 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Nathan S Artz; William M Haufe; Catherine A Hooker; Gavin Hamilton; Tanya Wolfson; Guilherme M Campos; Anthony C Gamst; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin; Scott B Reeder Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Catherine D G Hines; Alex Frydrychowicz; Gavin Hamilton; Dana L Tudorascu; Karl K Vigen; Huanzhou Yu; Charles A McKenzie; Claude B Sirlin; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: An Tang; Justin Tan; Mark Sun; Gavin Hamilton; Mark Bydder; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Michael Middleton; Elizabeth M Brunt; Rohit Loomba; Joel E Lavine; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Christoph Mahlke; Diego Hernando; Christina Jahn; Antonio Cigliano; Till Ittermann; Anne Mössler; Marie-Luise Kromrey; Grazyna Domaska; Scott B Reeder; Jens-Peter Kühn Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 4.813