Literature DB >> 20030967

Separating response-execution bias from decision bias: arguments for an additional parameter in Ratcliff's diffusion model.

Andreas Voss1, Jochen Voss, Karl Christoph Klauer.   

Abstract

Diffusion model data analysis permits the disentangling of different processes underlying the effects of experimental manipulations. Estimates can be provided for the speed of information accumulation, for the amount of information used to draw conclusions, and for a decision bias. One parameter describes the duration of non-decisional processes including the duration of motor-response execution. In the default diffusion model, it is implicitly assumed that both responses are executed with the same speed. In some applications of the diffusion model, this assumption will be violated. This will lead to biased parameter estimates. Consequently, we suggest accounting explicitly for differences in the speed of response execution for both responses. Results from a simulation study illustrate that parameter estimates from the default model are biased if the speed of response execution differs between responses. A second simulation study shows that large trial numbers (N>1,000) are needed to detect whether differences in response-execution times are based on different execution times.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20030967     DOI: 10.1348/000711009X477581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1102            Impact factor:   3.380


  9 in total

1.  They can take a hint: Older adults effectively integrate memory cues during recognition.

Authors:  Alex Konkel; Diana Selmeczy; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-12

2.  A diffusion model analysis of task interference effects in prospective memory.

Authors:  C Dennis Boywitt; Jan Rummel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01

3.  Retest reliability of the parameters of the Ratcliff diffusion model.

Authors:  Veronika Lerche; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-04-23

4.  Response biases in simple decision making: Faster decision making, faster response execution, or both?

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Qiuli Ma
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

5.  Assessing cognitive processes with diffusion model analyses: a tutorial based on fast-dm-30.

Authors:  Andreas Voss; Jochen Voss; Veronika Lerche
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-27

6.  Diffusion Modelling Reveals the Decision Making Processes Underlying Negative Judgement Bias in Rats.

Authors:  Claire A Hales; Emma S J Robinson; Conor J Houghton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Model Complexity in Diffusion Modeling: Benefits of Making the Model More Parsimonious.

Authors:  Veronika Lerche; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-13

8.  The diffusion model visualizer: an interactive tool to understand the diffusion model parameters.

Authors:  Rainer W Alexandrowicz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-10-25

9.  Behavioural and computational methods reveal differential effects for how delayed and rapid onset antidepressants effect decision making in rats.

Authors:  Claire A Hales; Conor J Houghton; Emma S J Robinson
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.600

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.