Scott H Stewart1, Tameeka L Law, Patrick K Randall, Roger Newman. 1. Charleston Alcohol Research Center and Center for Drug and Alcohol Programs, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. stewarsh@musc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fetal alcohol disorders are preventable, but self-reported alcohol consumption can be misleading and impede effective treatment. Biomarkers represent an alternative method for assessing alcohol use, and this study evaluated the relationship between blood phosphatidylethanol (PEth) and alcohol use in a sample of reproductive age women. METHODS: Alcohol use was estimated by validated self-report methods in 80 nonpregnant women ages 18 to 35. PEth was measured by a contracted laboratory using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. Regression methods appropriate for the distribution of PEth were used to define its relationship to alcohol consumption during the prior 2 weeks and explore the effects of drinking patterns on this association. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to estimate the sensitivity of PEth for various drinking levels at 95% specific cutoffs. RESULTS: PEth had a positive linear association with grams of alcohol consumed (p < 0.001), and was detectable in 93% of subjects consuming an average of 2 or more drinks per day. The relationship between total alcohol consumption and PEth may be stronger in women with recent heavy drinking days. The relationship between drinking and PEth varied considerably between individuals, and sensitivity for a certain amount of drinking was low at a highly specific cutoff concentration. CONCLUSIONS: PEth is a highly sensitive indicator of moderate and heavy alcohol consumption in reproductive age women and may complement the use of self-report alcohol screens when additional objective markers of alcohol use are desirable. However, choosing a highly valid cutoff concentration for PEth to differentiate various levels of alcohol consumption may not be feasible.
BACKGROUND:Fetal alcohol disorders are preventable, but self-reported alcohol consumption can be misleading and impede effective treatment. Biomarkers represent an alternative method for assessing alcohol use, and this study evaluated the relationship between blood phosphatidylethanol (PEth) and alcohol use in a sample of reproductive age women. METHODS:Alcohol use was estimated by validated self-report methods in 80 nonpregnant women ages 18 to 35. PEth was measured by a contracted laboratory using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. Regression methods appropriate for the distribution of PEth were used to define its relationship to alcohol consumption during the prior 2 weeks and explore the effects of drinking patterns on this association. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to estimate the sensitivity of PEth for various drinking levels at 95% specific cutoffs. RESULTS:PEth had a positive linear association with grams of alcohol consumed (p < 0.001), and was detectable in 93% of subjects consuming an average of 2 or more drinks per day. The relationship between total alcohol consumption and PEth may be stronger in women with recent heavy drinking days. The relationship between drinking and PEth varied considerably between individuals, and sensitivity for a certain amount of drinking was low at a highly specific cutoff concentration. CONCLUSIONS:PEth is a highly sensitive indicator of moderate and heavy alcohol consumption in reproductive age women and may complement the use of self-report alcohol screens when additional objective markers of alcohol use are desirable. However, choosing a highly valid cutoff concentration for PEth to differentiate various levels of alcohol consumption may not be feasible.
Authors: Friedrich M Wurst; Christer Alling; Steina Aradottir; Fritz Pragst; John P Allen; Wolfgang Weinmann; Phillipe Marmillot; Pradeep Ghosh; Raj Lakshman; Gregory E Skipper; Tim Neumann; Claudia Spies; Martin Javors; Bankole A Johnson; Nassima Ait-Daoud; Fatema Akhtar; John D Roache; Raye Litten Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: R Louise Floyd; Mary J O'Connor; Robert J Sokol; Jacquelyn Bertrand; José F Cordero Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Friedrich Martin Wurst; Stefan Alexson; Manfred Wolfersdorf; Gaby Bechtel; Stephan Forster; Christer Alling; Steina Aradóttir; Katja Jachau; Peter Huber; John P Allen; Volker Auwärter; Fritz Pragst Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: Yan Wang; Xinguang Chen; Judith A Hahn; Babette Brumback; Zhi Zhou; Maria J Miguez; Robert L Cook Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Scott H Stewart; David G Koch; Ira R Willner; Raymond F Anton; Adrian Reuben Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Judith A Hahn; Nneka I Emenyonu; Robin Fatch; Winnie R Muyindike; Allen Kekiibina; Adam W Carrico; Sarah Woolf-King; Stephen Shiboski Journal: Addiction Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Ludmila N Bakhireva; Renate D Savich; Dennis W Raisch; Sandra Cano; Robert D Annett; Lawrence Leeman; Mahek Garg; Chelsea Goff; Daniel D Savage Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Martin A Javors; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak; John D Roache; Tara E Karns-Wright; Donald M Dougherty Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-04-30 Impact factor: 3.455