Literature DB >> 20020327

Comparison of image quality of 64-slice multidetector CT coronary CT angiography using automated and manual multiphase methods for the determination of optimal phases for image reconstruction in patients with various mean heart rates.

Young Jun Cho1, Yeon Hyeon Choe, Moo-Sik Lee.   

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effects of the automated and manual methods for determining the optimal phase of image reconstruction with the use of 64-slice coronary CT angiography (CCTA). In 63 patients, the optimal trigger delay was determined using an automated technique (PhaseXact) and by manual phase selection from the images reconstructed at a 10 ms and 1% increment of the R-R interval. The image quality was evaluated using four-step grading. The mean heart rate in all the patients was 70 +/- 10.1 bpm (range: 52-98 bpm). The frequency of obtaining diagnostic quality images was highest with the manual absolute timing method (97.6% of 753 segments), while it was 94.7% with manual relative timing and 91.9% with an automated method. The mean image quality score (1.3 +/- 0.2) based on the manual absolute timing was significantly better (P = 0.002, one-way ANOVA; P < 0.05, Scheffe's test) than the scores determined with the use of the other two techniques (manual relative timing, 1.4 +/- 0.3; automated method, 1.5 +/- 0.4). The best quality coronary CT images were obtained using image reconstruction with manual absolute timing for the ECG-trigger delay, while an automated method and manual relative timing provided diagnostic quality images in most of the segments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20020327     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-009-9536-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  18 in total

1.  ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality.

Authors:  C Hong; C R Becker; A Huber; U J Schoepf; B Ohnesorge; A Knez; R Brüning; M F Reiser
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and optimal reconstruction window in retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT at 375-ms gantry rotation time.

Authors:  Xavier L Hamoir; Thomas Flohr; Vincent Hamoir; Laurent Labaki; Jean-Yves Tricquet; Alain Duhamel; Jacques Kirsch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Artifacts in ECG-synchronized MDCT coronary angiography.

Authors:  L J M Kroft; A de Roos; J Geleijns
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  [Cardiac multidetector-row CT: first clinical results of retrospectively ECG-gated spiral with optimized temporal and spatial resolution].

Authors:  A F Kopp; B Ohnesorge; T Flohr; C Georg; S Schröder; A Küttner; J Martensen; C D Claussen
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2000-05

6.  Heart-rate-adapted image reconstruction in multidetector-row cardiac CT: influence of physiological and technical prerequisite on image quality.

Authors:  Christopher Herzog; Nasreddin Abolmaali; Joern O Balzer; Sabine Baunach; Hanns Ackermann; Selami Dogan; Martina B Britten; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Ulrike Ropers; Dieter Ropers; Tobias Pflederer; Katharina Anders; Axel Kuettner; Nikolaos I Stilianakis; Sei Komatsu; Willi Kalender; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Non-invasive coronary angiography with 16-slice spiral computed tomography: image quality in patients with high heart rates.

Authors:  H Brodoefel; A Reimann; M Heuschmid; A Küttner; T Beck; C Burgstahler; C D Claussen; S Schroeder; A F Kopp
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Clinical evaluation of 64-slice CT assessment of global left ventricular function using automated cardiac phase selection.

Authors:  Raoul M S Joemai; Jacob Geleijns; Wouter J H Veldkamp; Lucia J M Kroft
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.993

10.  Automated cardiac phase selection with 64-MDCT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Raoul M S Joemai; Jacob Geleijns; Wouter J H Veldkamp; Albert de Roos; Lucia J M Kroft
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  2 in total

1.  Computer-aided CT coronary artery stenosis detection: comparison with human reading and quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  Matthias Rief; Anisha Kranz; Lisa Hartmann; Robert Roehle; Michael Laule; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Clinical evaluation of new automatic coronary-specific best cardiac phase selection algorithm for single-beat coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Lei Xu; Zhanming Fan; Junfu Liang; Zixu Yan; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.