Literature DB >> 17919694

Short-term health outcome differences between robotic and conventional radical prostatectomy.

David P Wood1, Ryan Schulte, Rodney L Dunn, Brent K Hollenbeck, Richard Saur, J Stuart Wolf, James E Montie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively compare the relevant in-hospital and postdischarge short-term health outcomes in a contemporary group of patients undergoing either robotic or conventional radical prostatectomy.
METHODS: A total of 117 robotic and 89 conventional radical prostatectomy patients participated in a prospective study evaluating short-term postoperative recovery. A validated short-term health outcomes questionnaire was self-administered at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. All patients were given the same preoperative and postoperative instructions.
RESULTS: The significant differences in short-term health outcome measures between the two groups were that robotic patients had less mean narcotic use during the first 24 hours of admission (32 versus 52 mg morphine sulfate equivalents, P = 0.001) and a shorter mean length of hospital stay (1.2 versus 1.3 days, P = 0.048). No difference was found between the robotic and conventional radical prostatectomy groups regarding the median time to normal activity, 100% activity, and time to driving (9 and 8, 21 and 28, and 13 and 14 days, respectively). No difference was found in the postdischarge pain levels at 2 and 6 weeks, as reflected in the equivalent time of narcotic use between the two groups (10.6 and 9 days for the robotic and conventional radical prostatectomy groups, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this prospective study have shown that both robotic and conventional radical prostatectomy provide comparable short-term postdischarge recovery, including time to normal and full activity, driving, and postdischarge narcotic use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17919694     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.06.1120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  15 in total

1.  Arguments against investing widely in robotic prostatectomy in Canada: a wrong focus on tool box rather than surgical expertise.

Authors:  Yves Fradet
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Mid-term biochemical recurrence-free outcomes following robotic versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Charles-Henry Rochat; Jean Sauvain; Pierre Dubernard; April E Hebert; Usha Kreaden
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-04-09

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a single cancer center experience.

Authors:  Renato Almeida Rosa de Oliveira; Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães; Thiago Camelo Mourão; Ricardo de Lima Favaretto; Thiago Borges Marques Santana; Ademar Lopes; Stenio de Cassio Zequi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-08

Review 4.  Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?

Authors:  Abbas Basiri; Jean Jmch de la Rosette; Shahin Tabatabaei; Henry H Woo; M Pilar Laguna; Hamidreza Shemshaki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; Elena B Elkin; Lindsay M Jacks; David S Yee; Thomas L Jang; Vincent P Laudone; Bertrand D Guillonneau; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Robotic Surgical System for Radical Prostatectomy: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-07-07

7.  Less Severe Intra-Abdominal Infections in Robotic Surgery for Gastric Cancer Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

Authors:  Naoshi Kubo; Katsunobu Sakurai; Yutaka Tamamori; Yasuyuki Fukui; Kenji Kuroda; Naoki Aomatsu; Takafumi Nishii; Akiko Tachimori; Kiyoshi Maeda
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-12-01

9.  Advances in robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stephen A Boorjian; Matthew T Gettman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy: 10 years of cases at Ramathibodi Hospital.

Authors:  Kun Sirisopana; Pocharapong Jenjitranant; Premsant Sangkum; Kittinut Kijvikai; Suthep Pacharatakul; Charoen Leenanupun; Wachira Kochakarn; Wisoot Kongchareonsombat
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.