Literature DB >> 20018361

Surface characterization of zirconia dental implants.

S Zinelis1, A Thomas, K Syres, N Silikas, G Eliades.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to characterize the chemical composition, microstructure and roughness of two commercially available zirconia dental implants (WhiteSky and Zit-Z).
METHODS: The chemical composition of the cervical collar and threaded root parts of the implants (n=2) were studied by XPS and HV-EDX. LV-SEM was used for morphological assessment, Raman microanalysis for microstructural characterization and optical profilometry for surface roughness measurements. XRD, HV-EDX and Raman microanalysis of bulk regions (longitudinal sections) were used as reference.
RESULTS: XPS showed the presence of C, O, Zr and Y (collar) plus Al (root) at implant surfaces. More C (10-26at%) and a lower Al/Zr ratio were found in WhiteSky (1.05 vs 1.26 in Zit-Z). Zr, Y and Al were detected in single, fully oxidized states. The same elements, plus Hf, were identified by HV-EDX at bulk and surface regions, with a Al/Zr ratio higher in WhiteSky (0.17 vs 0.09 in Zit-Z). Na, K and Cl contaminants were traced at implant root parts by both methods. XRD analysis of cross-sectioned specimens revealed the presence of monoclinic and tetragonal zirconia along with cubic yttria phases. Raman microanalysis showed that the monoclinic zirconia volume fraction was higher at root surfaces than the collar. No monoclinic phase was found at bulk regions. Significantly higher Sa and Sq values were recorded in WhiteSky than Zit-Z, whereas Zit-Z showed higher Rt value. SIGNIFICANCE: The differences found between the implants in the extent of carbon contamination, residual alumina content, tetragonal to monoclinic ZrO(2) phase transformation and 3D-roughness parameters may contribute to a substantial differentiation in the cellular and tissue response. Copyright (c) 2009 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20018361     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  11 in total

1.  Laser treatment of dental ceramic/cement layers: transmitted energy, temperature effects and surface characterisation.

Authors:  Olena Pich; René Franzen; Norbert Gutknecht; Stefan Wolfart
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Effects of different sterilization methods on surface characteristics and biofilm formation on zirconia in vitro.

Authors:  Aifang Han; James K H Tsoi; Jukka P Matinlinna; Yu Zhang; Zhuofan Chen
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Comparison of peri-implant bone formation around injection-molded and machined surface zirconia implants in rabbit tibiae.

Authors:  Hong-Kyun Kim; Kyung Mi Woo; Won-Jun Shon; Jin-Soo Ahn; Seunghee Cha; Young-Seok Park
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  An alumina toughened zirconia composite for dental implant application: in vivo animal results.

Authors:  Gianmario Schierano; Federico Mussano; Maria Giulia Faga; Giulio Menicucci; Carlo Manzella; Cristian Sabione; Tullio Genova; Mitzy Mauthe von Degerfeld; Bruno Peirone; Adele Cassenti; Paola Cassoni; Stefano Carossa
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Cell attachment and proliferation of bone marrow-derived osteoblast on zirconia of various surface treatment.

Authors:  Ahran Pae; Heesu Lee; Kwantae Noh; Yi-Hyung Woo
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Mesoporous magnesium silicate-incorporated poly(ε-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(ε-caprolactone) bioactive composite beneficial to osteoblast behaviors.

Authors:  Yunfei Niu; Wei Dong; Han Guo; Yuhu Deng; Lieping Guo; Xiaofei An; Dawei He; Jie Wei; Ming Li
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-05-27

7.  Topographic characterisation of dental implants for commercial use.

Authors:  A Mendoza-Arnau; M-F Vallecillo-Capilla; M-Á Cabrerizo-Vílchez; J-I Rosales-Leal
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-09-01

Review 8.  A Critical Review of Dental Implant Materials with an Emphasis on Titanium versus Zirconia.

Authors:  Reham B Osman; Michael V Swain
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 9.  Effect of Zirconia Dental Implant Surfaces on Bone Integration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ali Hafezeqoran; Roodabeh Koodaryan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Comparison of mechanical and biological properties of zirconia and titanium alloy orthodontic micro-implants.

Authors:  Hae Won Choi; Young Seok Park; Shin Hye Chung; Min Ho Jung; Won Moon; Sang Hoon Rhee
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.