Literature DB >> 15229121

Contacting controls: are we working harder for similar response rates, and does it make a difference?

A Rogers1, M A Murtaugh, S Edwards, M L Slattery.   

Abstract

Although obtaining high response rates is critical to epidemiologic studies, effort to achieve response rates is undocumented. The authors used three population-based case-control studies conducted in Utah between October 1991 and February 2003 to examine effort required for both initial contact and determination of final status. Differences in lifestyle characteristics between easy- or more-difficult-to-interview female controls were evaluated. Letter, phone, and in-person contacts were recorded to determine contact effort. Regarding effort required to achieve a final outcome, the number of contacts increased from eight to 14 over the 12-year study period. Compared with those in study A (conducted in 1991-1994), controls in studies B and C were twice as likely to require seven or more phone calls and controls in study B were twice as likely to require one or more in-person visit. Hispanic controls in study C were more likely than non-Hispanic White controls to receive an in-person visit and a noncontact letter. Compared with those more difficult to contact, those easy to contact were more likely to be overweight and less likely to have a family history of cancer. The amount of effort required to achieve similar or slightly lower response rates increased over time. This finding may in part depend on demographic characteristics of the population studied. Copyright 2004 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15229121     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwh176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  13 in total

1.  Interactions among smoking, obesity, and symptoms of acid reflux in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Kylie J Smith; Suzanne M O'Brien; B Mark Smithers; David C Gotley; Penelope M Webb; Adèle C Green; David C Whiteman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Behavioral risk factors and their relationship to tumor characteristics in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white long-term breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Madiha F Abdel-Maksoud; Betsy C Risendal; Marty L Slattery; Anna R Giuliano; Kathy B Baumgartner; Tim E Byers
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Comparative analysis of breast cancer risk factors among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women.

Authors:  Lisa M Hines; Betsy Risendal; Martha L Slattery; Kathy B Baumgartner; Anna R Giuliano; Carol Sweeney; Dana E Rollison; Tim Byers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Strategies for successful retention of Alaska Native and American Indian study participants.

Authors:  Diana Redwood; Jessica Leston; Elvin Asay; Elizabeth Ferucci; Ruth Etzel; Anne P Lanier
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2011-02

5.  The use of daily aspirin, nutritional supplements and alternative medications among Amish and non-Amish living in Ohio Appalachia.

Authors:  Gebra B Cuyún Carter; Mira L Katz; Amy K Ferketich; Steven K Clinton; Elizabeth M Grainger; Electra D Paskett; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 2.900

6.  Sampling procedures and sample representativeness in a national telephone survey: a Portuguese example.

Authors:  Sofia Correia; Paulo Dinis; Francisco Rolo; Nuno Lunet
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Differences in estrogen receptor subtype according to family history of breast cancer among Hispanic, but not non-Hispanic White women.

Authors:  Lisa M Hines; Betsy Risendal; Martha L Slattery; Kathy B Baumgartner; Anna R Giuliano; Tim Byers
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Predictors of Response Outcomes for Research Recruitment Through a Central Cancer Registry: Evidence From 17 Recruitment Efforts for Population-Based Studies.

Authors:  Morgan M Millar; Anita Y Kinney; Nicola J Camp; Lisa A Cannon-Albright; Mia Hashibe; David F Penson; Anne C Kirchhoff; Deborah W Neklason; Alicia W Gilsenan; Gretchen S Dieck; Antoinette M Stroup; Sandra L Edwards; Carrie Bateman; Marjorie E Carter; Carol Sweeney
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Reproductive history in relation to breast cancer risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women.

Authors:  Carol Sweeney; Kathy B Baumgartner; Tim Byers; Anna R Giuliano; Jennifer S Herrick; Maureen A Murtaugh; Martha L Slattery
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  A qualitative assessment of implementing a cross-cultural survey on cancer wards in Denmark--a description of barriers.

Authors:  Maria Kristiansen; Amani Hassani; Allan Krasnik
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.