Jill A Poole1, Debra J Romberger. 1. Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-5300, USA. japoole@unmc.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Agriculture represents a major industry worldwide, and despite protection against the development of IgE-mediated diseases, chronic exposure to agriculture-related organic dusts is associated with an increased risk of developing respiratory disease. This article will review the literature regarding new knowledge of important etiologic agents in the dusts and focus on the immunologic responses following acute and repetitive organic dust exposures. RECENT FINDINGS: Although endotoxin remains important, there is an emerging role of nonendotoxin components such as peptidoglycans from Gram-positive bacteria. Pattern recognition receptors including Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), TLR2 and intracellular nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptors are partially responsible for mediating the inflammatory consequences. Repeated organic dust exposures modulate innate and adaptive immune function with a resultant adaptation-like response. However, repetitive exposures cause lung parenchymal inflammation, chronic disease, and lung function decline over time. SUMMARY: The immunological consequences of organic dust exposure in the farming industry are likely explained by the diversity of microbial motifs in dust that can elicit differing innate immune receptor signaling pathways. Whereas initial activation results in a robust inflammatory response, repetitive dust exposures modulate immunity. This can result in low-grade, chronic inflammation, and/or protection against allergic disease.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Agriculture represents a major industry worldwide, and despite protection against the development of IgE-mediated diseases, chronic exposure to agriculture-related organic dusts is associated with an increased risk of developing respiratory disease. This article will review the literature regarding new knowledge of important etiologic agents in the dusts and focus on the immunologic responses following acute and repetitive organic dust exposures. RECENT FINDINGS: Although endotoxin remains important, there is an emerging role of nonendotoxin components such as peptidoglycans from Gram-positive bacteria. Pattern recognition receptors including Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), TLR2 and intracellular nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptors are partially responsible for mediating the inflammatory consequences. Repeated organic dust exposures modulate innate and adaptive immune function with a resultant adaptation-like response. However, repetitive exposures cause lung parenchymal inflammation, chronic disease, and lung function decline over time. SUMMARY: The immunological consequences of organic dust exposure in the farming industry are likely explained by the diversity of microbial motifs in dust that can elicit differing innate immune receptor signaling pathways. Whereas initial activation results in a robust inflammatory response, repetitive dust exposures modulate immunity. This can result in low-grade, chronic inflammation, and/or protection against allergic disease.
Authors: Shelley P Kirychuk; Stephen J Reynolds; Niels K Koehncke; Joshua Lawson; Philip Willson; Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan; Darcy Marciniuk; Henry L Classen; Trever Crowe; Natasha Just; David Schneberger; James A Dosman Journal: Ann Occup Hyg Date: 2010-06-10
Authors: Sadegh Samadi; Inge M Wouters; Rosa Houben; Ali-Reza Jamshidifard; Frank Van Eerdenburg; Dick J J Heederik Journal: Ann Occup Hyg Date: 2009-06-26
Authors: Virissa Lenters; Ioannis Basinas; Laura Beane-Freeman; Paolo Boffetta; Harvey Checkoway; David Coggon; Lützen Portengen; Malcolm Sim; Inge M Wouters; Dick Heederik; Roel Vermeulen Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2009-12-12 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: D A Schwartz; S K Landas; D L Lassise; L F Burmeister; G W Hunninghake; J A Merchant Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1992-04-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jill A Poole; Neil E Alexis; Conrad Parks; Amy K MacInnes; Martha J Gentry-Nielsen; Paul D Fey; Lennart Larsson; Diane Allen-Gipson; Susanna G Von Essen; Debra J Romberger Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2008-06-27 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Waltraud Eder; Walt Klimecki; Lizhi Yu; Erika von Mutius; Josef Riedler; Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer; Dennis Nowak; Fernando D Martinez Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Koteswara R Gottipati; Shiva Kumar Bandari; Matthew W Nonnenmann; Jeffrey L Levin; Gregory P Dooley; Stephen J Reynolds; Vijay Boggaram Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Christine G Parks; Armando Meyer; Laura E Beane Freeman; Jonathan N Hofmann; Dale P Sandler Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: D Schneberger; J R Gordon; J M DeVasure; J A Boten; A J Heires; D J Romberger; T A Wyatt Journal: Pulm Pharmacol Ther Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 3.410
Authors: D Schneberger; D Cloonan; J M DeVasure; K L Bailey; D J Romberger; T A Wyatt Journal: Int Immunopharmacol Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 4.932
Authors: Jean-François Sauvé; Sarah J Locke; Pabitra R Josse; Emma M Stapleton; Nervana Metwali; Ralph W Altmaier; Gabriella Andreotti; Peter S Thorne; Jonathan N Hofmann; Laura E Beane Freeman; Melissa C Friesen Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2020-04-17 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Jill A Poole; Debra J Romberger; Chris Bauer; Angela M Gleason; Joseph H Sisson; Peter J Oldenburg; William W West; Todd A Wyatt Journal: Exp Lung Res Date: 2012-08-16 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Debra J Romberger; Art J Heires; Tara M Nordgren; Jill A Poole; Myron L Toews; William W West; Todd A Wyatt Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Gregory A Golden; Todd A Wyatt; Debra J Romberger; Daniel Reiff; Michael McCaskill; Christopher Bauer; Angela M Gleason; Jill A Poole Journal: J Biochem Mol Toxicol Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 3.642