Literature DB >> 7911925

Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action.

C Vincent1, M Young, A Phillips.   

Abstract

To examine the reasons patients and their relatives take legal action, we surveyed 227 patients and relatives who were taking legal action through five firms of plaintiff medical negligence solicitors. Over 70% of respondents were seriously affected by incidents that gave rise to litigation with long-term effects on work, social life, and family relationships. Intense emotions were aroused and continued to be felt for a long time. The decision to take legal action was determined not only by the original injury, but also by insensitive handling and poor communication after the original incident. Where explanations were given, less than 15% were considered satisfactory. Four main themes emerged from the analysis of reasons for litigation: concern with standards of care--both patients and relatives wanted to prevent similar incidents in the future; the need for an explanation--to know how the injury happened and why; compensation--for actual losses, pain and suffering or to provide care in the future for an injured person; and accountability--a belief that the staff or organisation should have to account for their actions. Patients taking legal action wanted greater honesty, an appreciation of the severity of the trauma they had suffered, and assurances that lessons had been learnt from their experiences. A no-fault compensation system, however well intended, would not address all patients' concerns. If litigation is viewed solely as a legal and financial problem, many fundamental issues will not be addressed or resolved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7911925     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)93062-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  105 in total

1.  Expectations of health care: promoted, managed or shared?

Authors:  Julian Tudor Hart
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Patients' and doctors' attitudes to amount of information given after unintended injury during treatment: cross sectional, questionnaire survey.

Authors:  M Hingorani; T Wong; G Vafidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06

3.  After Bristol: putting patients at the centre.

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-16

Review 4.  Effects of the civil procedure rules on clinical negligence claims.

Authors:  M K Mayberry
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  A structured approach for the investigation of clinical incidents in health care: application in a general practice setting.

Authors:  Stephen Rogers
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  After Bristol: putting patients at the centre.

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-06

7.  Learning from malpractice claims about negligent, adverse events in primary care in the United States.

Authors:  R L Phillips; L A Bartholomew; S M Dovey; G E Fryer; T J Miyoshi; L A Green
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-04

8.  Malpractice suits and physician apologies in cancer care.

Authors:  Eugene Chung; Jill R Horwitz; John A E Pottow; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Impact of litigation on senior clinicians: implications for risk management.

Authors:  P Bark; C Vincent; L Olivieri; A Jones
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1997-03

10.  Patient assessments of a hypothetical medical error: effects of health outcome, disclosure, and staff responsiveness.

Authors:  A Cleopas; A Villaveces; A Charvet; P A Bovier; V Kolly; T V Perneger
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.