Literature DB >> 20012431

In vivo hemodynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms obtained by magnetic resonance fluid dynamics (MRFD) based on time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI.

Haruo Isoda1, Yasuhide Ohkura, Takashi Kosugi, Masaya Hirano, Hiroyasu Takeda, Hisaya Hiramatsu, Shuhei Yamashita, Yasuo Takehara, Marcus T Alley, Roland Bammer, Norbert J Pelc, Hiroki Namba, Harumi Sakahara.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hemodynamics is thought to play a very important role in the initiation, growth, and rupture of intracranial aneurysms. The purpose of our study was to perform in vivo hemodynamic analysis of unruptured intracranial aneurysms of magnetic resonance fluid dynamics using time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI (4D-Flow) at 1.5 T and to analyze relationships between hemodynamics and wall shear stress (WSS) and oscillatory shear index (OSI).
METHODS: This study included nine subjects with 14 unruptured aneurysms. 4D-Flow was performed by a 1.5-T magnetic resonance scanner with a head coil. We calculated in vivo streamlines, WSS, and OSI of intracranial aneurysms based on 4D-Flow with our software. We evaluated the number of spiral flows in the aneurysms and compared the differences in WSS or OSI between the vessel and aneurysm and between whole aneurysm and the apex of the spiral flow.
RESULTS: 3D streamlines, WSS, and OSI distribution maps in arbitrary direction during the cardiac phase were obtained for all intracranial aneurysms. Twelve aneurysms had one spiral flow each, and two aneurysms had two spiral flows each. The WSS was lower and the OSI was higher in the aneurysm compared to the vessel. The apex of the spiral flow had a lower WSS and higher OSI relative to the whole aneurysm.
CONCLUSION: Each intracranial aneurysm in this study had at least one spiral flow. The WSS was lower and OSI was higher at the apex of the spiral flow than the whole aneurysmal wall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20012431     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-009-0635-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  28 in total

1.  In vitro and in vivo comparison of three MR measurement methods for calculating vascular shear stress in the internal carotid artery.

Authors:  A M Masaryk; R Frayne; O Unal; E Krupinski; C M Strother
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Blood flow decrease induces apoptosis of endothelial cells in previously dilated arteries resulting from chronic high blood flow.

Authors:  E Sho; M Sho; T M Singh; C Xu; C K Zarins; H Masuda
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.311

3.  Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  A M Malek; S L Alper; S Izumo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Visualization of hemodynamics in intracranial arteries using time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Shuhei Yamashita; Haruo Isoda; Masaya Hirano; Hiroyasu Takeda; Shoichi Inagawa; Yasuo Takehara; Marcus T Alley; Michael Markl; Norbert J Pelc; Harumi Sakahara
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  In vivo assessment and visualization of intracranial arterial hemodynamics with flow-sensitized 4D MR imaging at 3T.

Authors:  S Wetzel; S Meckel; A Frydrychowicz; L Bonati; E-W Radue; K Scheffler; J Hennig; M Markl
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress.

Authors:  D N Ku; D P Giddens; C K Zarins; S Glagov
Journal:  Arteriosclerosis       Date:  1985 May-Jun

7.  Comparison of hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms between MR fluid dynamics using 3D cine phase-contrast MRI and MR-based computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Haruo Isoda; Yasuhide Ohkura; Takashi Kosugi; Masaya Hirano; Marcus T Alley; Roland Bammer; Norbert J Pelc; Hiroki Namba; Harumi Sakahara
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Computational replicas: anatomic reconstructions of cerebral vessels as volume numerical grids at three-dimensional angiography.

Authors:  Tamer Hassan; Eugene V Timofeev; Tsutomu Saito; Hiroaki Shimizu; Masayuki Ezura; Teiji Tominaga; Akira Takahashi; Kazuyoshi Takayama
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Blood flow dynamics in patient-specific cerebral aneurysm models: the relationship between wall shear stress and aneurysm area index.

Authors:  Alvaro Valencia; Hernan Morales; Rodrigo Rivera; Eduardo Bravo; Marcelo Galvez
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 2.242

10.  Impact of aneurysmal geometry on intraaneurysmal flow: a computerized flow simulation study.

Authors:  Istvan Szikora; Gyorgy Paal; Adam Ugron; Ferenc Nasztanovics; Miklos Marosfoi; Zsolt Berentei; Zsolt Kulcsar; Wickly Lee; Imre Bojtar; Istvan Nyary
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  27 in total

1.  Accelerated dual-venc 4D flow MRI for neurovascular applications.

Authors:  Susanne Schnell; Sameer A Ansari; Can Wu; Julio Garcia; Ian G Murphy; Ozair A Rahman; Amir A Rahsepar; Maria Aristova; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  What does computational fluid dynamics tell us about intracranial aneurysms? A meta-analysis and critical review.

Authors:  Khalid M Saqr; Sherif Rashad; Simon Tupin; Kuniyasu Niizuma; Tamer Hassan; Teiji Tominaga; Makoto Ohta
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 3.  4D flow imaging: current status to future clinical applications.

Authors:  Michael Markl; Susanne Schnell; Alex J Barker
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Highly accelerated intracranial 4D flow MRI: evaluation of healthy volunteers and patients with intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Louise Koskas; Farshid Faraji; Evan Kao; Yan Wang; Henrik Haraldsson; Sarah Kefayati; Chengcheng Zhu; Sinyeob Ahn; Gerhard Laub; David Saloner
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Reproducibility and interobserver variability of systolic blood flow velocity and 3D wall shear stress derived from 4D flow MRI in the healthy aorta.

Authors:  Pim van Ooij; Alexander L Powell; Wouter V Potters; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Clinical Applications of MRA 4D-Flow.

Authors:  Lilia M Sierra-Galan; Christopher J François
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-09-10

7.  Hemodynamic vascular biomarkers for initiation of paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms using patient-specific computational fluid dynamic simulation based on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tomoya Watanabe; Haruo Isoda; Yasuo Takehara; Masaki Terada; Takehiro Naito; Takafumi Kosugi; Yuki Onishi; Chiharu Tanoi; Takashi Izumi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  Physical factors effecting cerebral aneurysm pathophysiology.

Authors:  Chander Sadasivan; David J Fiorella; Henry H Woo; Baruch B Lieber
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Improved cardiovascular flow quantification with time-resolved volumetric phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Albert Hsiao; Marcus T Alley; Payam Massaband; Robert J Herfkens; Frandics P Chan; Shreyas S Vasanawala
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-01-11

10.  Experimental insights into flow impingement in cerebral aneurysm by stereoscopic particle image velocimetry: transition from a laminar regime.

Authors:  Takanobu Yagi; Ayaka Sato; Manabu Shinke; Sara Takahashi; Yasutaka Tobe; Hiroyuki Takao; Yuichi Murayama; Mitsuo Umezu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.