Literature DB >> 11598470

Complications of dynamic graciloplasty: incidence, management, and impact on outcome.

K E Matzel1, R D Madoff, L J LaFontaine, C G Baeten, W D Buie, J Christiansen, S Wexner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dynamic graciloplasty can improve continence in patients with severe refractory fecal incontinence, but associated morbidity is high. The purpose of this study was to identify complications associated with dynamic graciloplasty and to characterize their treatment and impact on patient outcome.
METHODS: In 121 patients enrolled in a prospective trial of 20 centers and eligible for safety analysis, all complications of dynamic graciloplasty were recorded at the time of their occurrence and followed up until resolution. Severe treatment-related complications were defined as those requiring hospitalization or surgical intervention.
RESULTS: In 93 patients, 211 complications occurred. Of these, 89 (42 percent) in 61 patients were classified as severe treatment-related complications and resulted from the following: major infection, 19; minor infection, 10; thromboembolic events, 3; device performance and use, 13; pain, 16; noninfectious gracilis problems, 8; noninfectious wound-healing problems, 3; other surgery-related complications, 3. In addition, severe treatment-related complications resulted from constipation in ten and stoma creation or closure in ten. The recovery rate (full or partial) was 87 percent overall, and for severe treatment-related complications, was 92 percent. Of the types of complications, only major infections had an adverse effect on outcome.
CONCLUSION: Severe complications occur frequently after dynamic graciloplasty, but are usually treatable. They often require one or more reoperations and can lead to significant delays in completion of therapy. In most cases therapy can be salvaged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11598470     DOI: 10.1007/bf02234593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  17 in total

1.  Meta-analysis: sacral nerve stimulation versus conservative therapy in the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Emile Tan; Nye-Thane Ngo; Ara Darzi; Michael Shenouda; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  [Dynamic graciloplasty vs artificial bowel sphincter in the management of severe fecal incontinence].

Authors:  O Ruthmann; A Fischer; U T Hopt; H J Schrag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Muscle transposition: does it still have a role?

Authors:  Susan M Cera; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

4.  Sacral nerve stimulation induces changes in the pelvic floor and rectum that improve continence and quality of life.

Authors:  Susanne Dorothea Otto; Stefanie Burmeister; Heinz J Buhr; Anton Kroesen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Ann M Van Koughnett; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  New options for the treatment of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  David A Margolin
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2008

Review 7.  Surgical management for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Joselin L Anandam
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-09

Review 8.  [Treatment of sphincter insufficiency].

Authors:  K E Matzel; B Bittorf
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of severe faecal incontinence: long-term clinical, manometric and quality of life results.

Authors:  P Moya; A Arroyo; J Lacueva; F Candela; L Soriano-Irigaray; A López; M A Gómez; I Galindo; R Calpena
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 10.  Faecal incontinence: Current knowledges and perspectives.

Authors:  Alban Benezech; Michel Bouvier; Véronique Vitton
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.