Literature DB >> 26081471

Two different gracilis loops in graciloplasty of congenital fecal incontinence: comparison of the therapeutic effects.

Gang-Gang Shi1, Hui Wang1, Li Wang1, Zuo-Xing Zhang1, Hao Wang2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effect of graciloplasty using two different gracilis encircled loops for the treatment of fecal incontinence after anoplasty for imperforate anus.
METHODS: From January 2009 to January 2012, 38 patients were treated by graciloplasty. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, one group consisting of 18 cases underwent the "γ-loop" and the other group consisting of 20 cases underwent the "υ-loop." All patients underwent postoperative defecation training and regular follow-up. All patients were evaluated via Wexner score and anal manometry (including anal resting pressure, anal maximal squeeze pressure, duration of anal squeeze, and rectal maximum tolerable volume) before and after graciloplasty. In addition, it was assessed whether the patients had difficulty defecating while squatting after surgery.
RESULTS: The surgeries on the 38 patients were accomplished successfully. There were no differences in postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). The Wexner score and anal manometry parameters of the two groups were gradually improved after operation. The generalized estimating equation results of the Wexner score indicated that the difference of measurement time was statistically significant (P < 0.05) but the difference of measurement group was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The results of anal manometry parameters using repeated measures ANOVA indicated that differences between different time points were statistically significant (all P < 0.05) but differences between different surgery groups were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). Regarding the postoperative defecating difficulties while squatting, the probability of occurrence in the "γ-loop" group was significantly higher than that in the "υ-loop" group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Graciloplasty with different gracilis loops can improve anal function in patients. However, "υ-loop" can significantly improve difficulties in defecating while squatting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anal sphincter; Difficulty defecating; Fecal incontinence; Graciloplasty; Squatting

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26081471     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2274-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  13 in total

1.  Preliminary results of a multicentre trial of the electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter.

Authors:  B J Mander; S D Wexner; N S Williams; D C Bartolo; D Z Lubowski; T Oresland; G Romano; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle; a report of four cases in children.

Authors:  K L PICKRELL; T R BROADBENT; F W MASTERS; J T METZGER
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1952-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Muscle transposition: does it still have a role?

Authors:  Susan M Cera; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

4.  Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems.

Authors:  C J Vaizey; E Carapeti; J A Cahill; M A Kamm
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  C G Baeten; O Uludag O; M J Rongen
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.425

6.  Morphology of dynamic graciloplasty compared with the anal sphincter.

Authors:  J Konsten; C G Baeten; M G Havenith; P B Soeters
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 7.  Gracilis muscle transposition in the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  I Sielezneff; S Bauer; J C Bulgare; J C Sarles
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence.

Authors:  C G Baeten; B P Geerdes; E M Adang; E Heineman; J Konsten; G L Engel; A D Kester; F Spaans; P B Soeters
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Follow-up evaluation of gracilis muscle transposition for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  M L Corman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Adynamic and dynamic muscle transposition techniques for anal incontinence.

Authors:  Goran Barišić; Zoran Krivokapić
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-03-19
View more
  1 in total

1.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.