Literature DB >> 20007038

A distributed, collaborative intelligent agent system approach for proactive postmarketing drug safety surveillance.

Yanqing Ji1, Hao Ying, Margo S Farber, John Yen, Peter Dews, Richard E Miller, R Michael Massanari.   

Abstract

Discovering unknown adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in postmarketing surveillance as early as possible is of great importance. The current approach to postmarketing surveillance primarily relies on spontaneous reporting. It is a passive surveillance system and limited by gross underreporting (<10% reporting rate), latency, and inconsistent reporting. We propose a novel team-based intelligent agent software system approach for proactively monitoring and detecting potential ADRs of interest using electronic patient records. We designed such a system and named it ADRMonitor. The intelligent agents, operating on computers located in different places, are capable of continuously and autonomously collaborating with each other and assisting the human users (e.g., the food and drug administration (FDA), drug safety professionals, and physicians). The agents should enhance current systems and accelerate early ADR identification. To evaluate the performance of the ADRMonitor with respect to the current spontaneous reporting approach, we conducted simulation experiments on identification of ADR signal pairs (i.e., potential links between drugs and apparent adverse reactions) under various conditions. The experiments involved over 275,000 simulated patients created on the basis of more than 1000 real patients treated by the drug cisapride that was on the market for seven years until its withdrawal by the FDA in 2000 due to serious ADRs. Healthcare professionals utilizing the spontaneous reporting approach and the ADRMonitor were separately simulated by decision-making models derived from a general cognitive decision model called fuzzy recognition-primed decision (RPD) model that we recently developed. The quantitative simulation results show that 1) the number of true ADR signal pairs detected by the ADRMonitor is 6.6 times higher than that by the spontaneous reporting strategy; 2) the ADR detection rate of the ADRMonitor agents with even moderate decision-making skills is five times higher than that of spontaneous reporting; and 3) as the number of patient cases increases, ADRs could be detected significantly earlier by the ADRMonitor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20007038      PMCID: PMC3919656          DOI: 10.1109/TITB.2009.2037007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed        ISSN: 1089-7771


  21 in total

1.  Timing of new black box warnings and withdrawals for prescription medications.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; Paul D Allen; Steffie J Woolhandler; David U Himmelstein; Sidney M Wolfe; David H Bor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports.

Authors:  S J Evans; P C Waller; S Davis
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2001 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Automated monitoring of medical protocols: a secure and distributed architecture.

Authors:  T Alsinet; C Ansótegui; R Béjar; C Fernández; F Manyà
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 4.  Quantitative methods in pharmacovigilance: focus on signal detection.

Authors:  Manfred Hauben; Xiaofeng Zhou
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Automated signal generation in prescription-event monitoring.

Authors:  Emma Heeley; Lynda V Wilton; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Statistical techniques for signal generation: the Australian experience.

Authors:  Patrick Purcell; Simon Barty
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Comparison of data mining methodologies using Japanese spontaneous reports.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Kubota; Daisuke Koide; Toshiki Hirai
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Reasons for reporting adverse drug reactions--some thoughts based on an international review.

Authors:  C Biriell; I R Edwards
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  Pharmacovigilance in the 21st century: new systematic tools for an old problem.

Authors:  Ana Szarfman; Joseph M Tonning; P Murali Doraiswamy
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 10.  Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions : a systematic review.

Authors:  Lorna Hazell; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.228

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Literature Review of Agents Applied in Healthcare.

Authors:  David Isern; Antonio Moreno
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a challenge for pharmacovigilance in India.

Authors:  Vishal R Tandon; Vivek Mahajan; Vijay Khajuria; Zahid Gillani
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.200

3.  Roll out of intraveneous artesunate under named patient programmes in the Netherlands, Belgium and France.

Authors:  Annemarie Rosan Kreeftmeijer-Vegter; Cornelis Kw van Veldhuizen; Peter J de Vries
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.123

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.