Literature DB >> 12071779

Automated signal generation in prescription-event monitoring.

Emma Heeley1, Lynda V Wilton, Saad A W Shakir.   

Abstract

Signal generation is a method of highlighting potential safety issues in a drug that then need to be investigated further. Previously automated signal generation has mainly been applied to spontaneous reporting systems. The Drug Safety Research Unit (DSRU) performs observational postmarketing studies on selected newly marketed medicines in England using a method known as prescription-event monitoring (PEM). The DSRU has investigated automated procedures for the generation of signals using the event data from PEM studies. Proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were studied as possible tools for signal generation in PEM data. The PEM database contains 78 completed studies of drugs prescribed in primary care from a variety of therapeutic classes. Retrospective studies were carried out to identify the implications of changing the comparator group of drugs, along with analysing the results at different levels in the DSRU's hierarchical dictionary and performing signal generation after 30 and 180 days of observation since starting the drug. Automated signal generation is a useful hypothesis generating method that is likely to prove to be useful both in clinical trials and postmarketing studies. PRRs are simple to apply and do not require a denominator. IRRs take into account the time subjects were exposed to the drug prior to the event of interest, and offers a useful, and more in depth look into the data. However, with both methods it is important to perform signal generation at multiple levels in the dictionary and with careful selection of the comparator group.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12071779     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200225060-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  8 in total

1.  Different versions of the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system and the defined daily dose--are drug utilisation data comparable?

Authors:  M Rønning; H S Blix; B T Harbø; H Strøm
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports.

Authors:  S J Evans; P C Waller; S Davis
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2001 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 3.  Prescription-event monitoring--recent progress and future horizons.

Authors:  R D Mann
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation.

Authors:  A Bate; M Lindquist; I R Edwards; S Olsson; R Orre; A Lansner; R M De Freitas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Visual hallucinations associated with fluoxetine and sertraline.

Authors:  J A Bourgeois; D Thomas; T Johansen; D M Walker
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.153

6.  Adverse drug reactions: finding the needle in the haystack.

Authors:  I R Edwards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-08-30

Review 7.  Psychotic depression.

Authors:  W Coryell
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.384

8.  Safety profile of tolterodine as used in general practice in England: results of prescription-event monitoring.

Authors:  D Layton; G L Pearce; S A Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

  8 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative methods in pharmacovigilance: focus on signal detection.

Authors:  Manfred Hauben; Xiaofeng Zhou
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  In defence of polypharmacy.

Authors:  J K Aronson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Application of data mining techniques in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Andrew M Wilson; Lehana Thabane; Anne Holbrook
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Paediatric postmarketing pharmacovigilance using prescription-event monitoring: comparison of the adverse event profiles of lamotrigine prescribed to children and adults in England.

Authors:  Beate Aurich-Barrera; Lynda Wilton; David Brown; Saad Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Postmarketing safety surveillance : where does signal detection using electronic healthcare records fit into the big picture?

Authors:  Preciosa M Coloma; Gianluca Trifirò; Vaishali Patadia; Miriam Sturkenboom
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  A distributed, collaborative intelligent agent system approach for proactive postmarketing drug safety surveillance.

Authors:  Yanqing Ji; Hao Ying; Margo S Farber; John Yen; Peter Dews; Richard E Miller; R Michael Massanari
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2009-12-11

7.  Prescription-event monitoring: developments in signal detection.

Authors:  Germano Ferreira
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Leveraging graph topology and semantic context for pharmacovigilance through twitter-streams.

Authors:  Ryan Eshleman; Rahul Singh
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.