Literature DB >> 23095727

Visual outcome correlates with inner macular volume in eyes with surgically closed macular hole.

Suman Pilli1, Robert J Zawadzki, John S Werner, Susanna S Park.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the macular morphologic features that correlate best with visual outcome in eyes with surgically closed idiopathic macular hole.
METHODS: Transversal observational case series of 24 eyes (22 subjects) imaged postoperatively using high-resolution Fourier domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT). Total and inner macular volume for central 3 mm area, central foveal thickness, and size of foveal inner segment-outer segment junction abnormality were correlated with best-corrected visual acuity. Microperimetry (MP-1) test was performed in a subset of 18 eyes.
RESULTS: Mean postoperative best-corrected visual acuity was 20/36 (range, 20/25-20/70). Postoperative follow-up mean was 32.97 ± 24.68 months (range, 5-96 months). Eighteen eyes underwent internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. Among FD-OCT parameters, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity and mean total microperimetry-1 sensitivity correlated best with inner macular volume in all eyes and ILM-peeled eyes (P < 0.05). Macular surface irregularities were noted in 12 eyes (66.7%) with ILM peeling but in none of the non-ILM-peeled eyes (P = 0.02). No significant correlation was found between microperimetry-1 sensitivity and other FD-OCT parameters.
CONCLUSION: Because inner macular volume strongly correlated with visual outcome in eyes with surgically closed macular hole, the possible effect of ILM peeling on visual outcome needs to be further investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23095727      PMCID: PMC3636309          DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31825c1c0c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  38 in total

1.  Focal macular ERGs in eyes after removal of macular ILM during macular hole surgery.

Authors:  H Terasaki; Y Miyake; R Nomura; C H Piao; K Hori; T Niwa; M Kondo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  S Ullrich; C Haritoglou; C Gass; M Schaumberger; M W Ulbig; A Kampik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Macular configuration determined by optical coherence tomography after idiopathic macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  R Uemoto; S Yamamoto; T Aoki; I Tsukahara; T Yamamoto; S Takeuchi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Irregularity of photoreceptor layer after successful macular hole surgery prevents visual acuity improvement.

Authors:  Norihiko Kitaya; Taiichi Hikichi; Hiroyuki Kagokawa; Akira Takamiya; Atsushi Takahashi; Akitoshi Yoshida
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Comparison of the in vitro toxicity of indocyanine green to that of trypan blue in human retinal pigment epithelium cell cultures.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Gale; Alain A Proulx; John R Gonder; Alexander J Mao; Cindy M L Hutnik
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Nerve fiber layer irregularity after internal limiting membrane peeling, seen by spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  J B Chae; D K Choi; J-G Kim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Paracentral scotomata: a new finding after vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole.

Authors:  C Haritoglou; O Ehrt; C A Gass; N Kristin; A Kampik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Optical coherence tomography of successfully repaired idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  M Imai; H Iijima; T Gotoh; S Tsukahara
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Safety testing of indocyanine green and trypan blue using retinal pigment epithelium and glial cell cultures.

Authors:  Timothy L Jackson; Jost Hillenkamp; Bruce C Knight; Jin-Jun Zhang; Dhanes Thomas; Miles R Stanford; John Marshall
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Types of macular hole closure and their clinical implications.

Authors:  S W Kang; K Ahn; D-I Ham
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  5 in total

1.  Correlation between central retinal thickness after successful macular hole surgery and visual outcome.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Takamura; Takeshi Tomomatsu; Takehiro Matsumura; Shogo Arimura; Makoto Gozawa; Yuji Takihara; Masaru Inatani
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Foveola nonpeeling internal limiting membrane surgery to prevent inner retinal damages in early stage 2 idiopathic macula hole.

Authors:  Tzyy-Chang Ho; Chung-May Yang; Jen-Shang Huang; Chang-Hao Yang; Muh-Shy Chen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-23       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Preoperative prognostic factors for macular hole surgery: Which is better?

Authors:  Erkan Unsal; Mehmet Ozgur Cubuk; Furkan Ciftci
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019 Jan-Apr

4.  Re: Unsal et al. Preoperative prognostic factors for macular hole surgery: which is better? Oman J Ophthalmol 2019;12:20-4. [doi: 10.4103/ojo.OJO_247_2017].

Authors:  Piergiacomo Grassi
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-27

Review 5.  Spotlight on the Internal Limiting Membrane Technique for Macular Holes: Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Tomaso Caporossi; Matteo Mario Carlà; Gloria Gambini; Umberto De Vico; Antonio Baldascino; Stanislao Rizzo
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.