| Literature DB >> 20003356 |
Katrien Smits1, Karen Goossens, Ann Van Soom, Jan Govaere, Maarten Hoogewijs, Emilie Vanhaesebrouck, Cesare Galli, Silvia Colleoni, Jo Vandesompele, Luc Peelman.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Application of reverse transcription quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction is very well suited to reveal differences in gene expression between in vivo and in vitro produced embryos. Ultimately, this may lead to optimized equine assisted reproductive techniques. However, for a correct interpretation of the real-time PCR results, all data must be normalized, which is most reliably achieved by calculating the geometric mean of the most stable reference genes. In this study a set of reliable reference genes was identified for equine in vivo and fresh and frozen-thawed in vitro embryos.Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20003356 PMCID: PMC2797813 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-246
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Primers
| Gene | GenBank accession number | Sequence | Amplicon size (bp) | Ta (°C) | RTprimerDB ID | Cq range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTB | CCAGCACGATGAAGATCAAG | 88 | 60 | 7848 | 16.3-23.8 | |
| GAPDH | CAGAACATCATCCCTGCTTC | 187 | 59 | 7849 | 14.2-24.5 | |
| H2A/I | ATATTCAGGCCGTGCTGCT | 105 | 60 | * | 23.5-37.3 | |
| HPRT1 | GGCAAAACAATGCAAACCTT | 163 | 57 | 7850 | 17.6-25.8 | |
| RPL32 | AGCCATCTACTCGGCGTCA | 149 | 60 | * | 16.8-25.9 | |
| SDHA | TCCATCGCATAAGAGCAAAG | 159 | 59 | 7851 | 20.7-33.3 | |
| TUBA4A | GCCCTACAACTCCATCCTGA | 78 | 60 | * | 16.6-27.9 | |
| UBC | GCAAGACCATCACCCTGGA | 206 | 60 | 7874 | 15.5-23.7 |
For each reference gene, the NCBI GenBank accession number, the sequence of both forward and reverse primer, the size of the amplicon and the optimal primer annealing temperature are listed. The RTPrimerDB ID http://rtprimerdb.org/ is also reported, except for the primers for which there is not yet an official reference sequence available in the database (*).
PCR efficiency and the respectively standard error
| Gene | Efficiency (%) | Standard error |
|---|---|---|
| ACTB | 98.1 | 0.01 |
| GAPDH | 100 | 0.021 |
| H2A/I | 100 | 0.067 |
| HPRT1 | 100 | 0.037 |
| RPL32 | 100 | 0.071 |
| SDHA | 99.3 | 0.033 |
| TUBA4A | 100 | 0.017 |
| UBC | 97.1 | 0.017 |
Figure 1Average expression stability values of equine . The average stability values of the control genes were calculated with geNorm. When in vivo embryos and fresh and frozen-thawed in vitro embryos were combined, UBC, ACTB, RPL32 and GAPDH were found to be the most stable.
Figure 2Average expression stability values of equine . The average stability values of the control genes were calculated with geNorm. In the population of the equine in vivo embryos UBC, GAPDH, ACTB and HPRT1 were found to be the most stable.
Figure 3Average expression stability values of fresh equine . The average stability values of the control genes were calculated with geNorm. In the population of the fresh equine in vivo embryos UBC, RPL32, GAPDH and ACTB were found to be the most stable.
Figure 4Average expression stability values of frozen-thawed equine . The average stability values of the control genes were calculated with geNorm. In the population of the fresh equine in vivo embryos UBC, RPL32, GAPDH and ACTB were found to be the most stable.
Figure 5Determination of the optimal number of control genes for normalization. The optimal number of control genes for normalization was calculated by geNorm. The value of the pairwise variations reduces until 0.207 for V3/4, which indicates that the inclusion a fourth reference gene contributes to the stability. Therefore the average of the 4 most stable genes is recommended to determine a reliable NF.