Literature DB >> 20001895

Megaprosthetic reconstruction for malignant bone tumors: complications and outcomes.

Andreas F Mavrogenis1, Pietro Ruggieri, Mario Mercuri, Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos.   

Abstract

Limb salvage surgery and reconstruction of bone defects is challenging in orthopaedic oncology. Allogenic and autologous bone grafting are well-recognized methods for bone reconstruction. Custom-made and modular, cemented and cementless, mega-prostheses provide the modular options needed intraoperatively to bridge variable bone defects. However, these mega-prostheses have worse long-term results compared to conventional total joint replacements. Mechanical failure, aseptic loosening, infection, dislocation, skin necrosis, extensor mechanism ruptures and periprosthetic fractures are acknowledged complications of orthopaedic oncology procedures. These complications are due to the large defects that need to be bridged with a more difficult fixation in the diaphysis of the native bone, the more complex restoration of joint biomechanics, the extensive soft-tissue resection, the lengthy surgical operations, and the need for chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Because of the difficulties and the high rate of complications associated with the implantation of such highly modular systems, the treatment of patients with malignant bone tumors should only be carried out in specialized centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 20001895     DOI: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v18.i3.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants        ISSN: 1050-6934


  7 in total

1.  Reconstruction of the proximal femur with a modular resection prosthesis.

Authors:  Teresa Calabró; Rupert Van Rooyen; Ilaria Piraino; Elisa Pala; Giulia Trovarelli; Georgios N Panagopoulos; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Andrea Angelini; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-04-04

Review 2.  Fractures in bone tumour prosthesis.

Authors:  Andrea Piccioli; Barbara Rossi; Federico Maria Sacchetti; Maria Silvia Spinelli; Alberto Di Martino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Evaluation of osseous integration of PVD-silver-coated hip prostheses in a canine model.

Authors:  Gregor Hauschild; Jendrik Hardes; Georg Gosheger; Sandra Stoeppeler; Helmut Ahrens; Franziska Blaske; Christoph Wehe; Uwe Karst; Steffen Höll
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Survivorship of Megaprostheses in Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty for Septic and Aseptic Indications: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Eric L Smith; Akash Shah; Sung Jun Son; Ruijia Niu; Carl T Talmo; Ayesha Abdeen; Muzna Ali; John Pinski; Matthew Gordon; Santiago Lozano-Calderon; Hany S Bedair
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-06-29

5.  Is the Capanna Technique a Reliable Method for Revision Surgery after Failure of Previous Limb-Salvage Surgery?

Authors:  Minghui Li; Xin Xiao; Junjun Fan; Yajie Lu; Guojing Chen; Mengquan Huang; Chuanlei Ji; Zhen Wang; Jing Li
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Fighting Megaprosthetic Infections: What are the Chances of Winning?

Authors:  Manit K Gundavda; Ameya Katariya; Rajeev Reddy; Manish G Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 1.033

7.  Load and failure behavior of human muscle samples in the context of proximal femur replacement.

Authors:  Stefan Schleifenbaum; Michael Schmidt; Robert Möbius; Thomas Wolfskämpf; Christian Schröder; Ronny Grunert; Niels Hammer; Torsten Prietzel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.