Literature DB >> 34341889

Is the Capanna Technique a Reliable Method for Revision Surgery after Failure of Previous Limb-Salvage Surgery?

Minghui Li1, Xin Xiao1, Junjun Fan1, Yajie Lu1, Guojing Chen1, Mengquan Huang1, Chuanlei Ji1, Zhen Wang1, Jing Li2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of a massive bone defect caused by previous failed limb-salvage surgery in patients with bone sarcoma is challenging. Many procedures have been used, but they all have their inherent disadvantages. The Capanna technique has demonstrated good functional outcomes and a low incidence of complications in primary reconstructive surgery of massive bone defect. However, few studies have focused on its usage in revision surgery after failed primary limb-salvage surgery.
METHODS: Between June 2011 and January 2017, 13 patients underwent revision surgery with the Capanna technique for reconstruction of a secondary segmental bone defect caused by a previous failed surgical procedure. The demographics, operating procedures, graft union, functional outcomes, oncologic outcomes, and postoperative complications of each patient were recorded.
RESULTS: The current study investigated 13 patients. The rate of limb salvage was 100 %. Bone union was achieved for all patients during a mean time of 8.54 ± 2.15 months (range 4-11 months) at the fibula-host bone junction and 14.92 ± 2.33 months (range 12-21 months) at the allograft-host bone junction. The postoperative complications included wound healing issues and internal fixation loosening. Allograft fracture, nonunion, and infection were not observed. All the patients achieved good functional outcomes, with a Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score of 0.86 ± 0.03 at the latest follow-up visit.
CONCLUSIONS: The Capanna technique is a reliable alternative method for revision reconstruction of a segmental bone defect caused by a previous failed surgical procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.
© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34341889     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10506-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  17 in total

1.  Microsurgical reconstruction with vascularized fibula and massive bone allograft for bone tumors.

Authors:  Costantino Errani; Massimo Ceruso; Davide Maria Donati; Marco Manfrini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-12-05

2.  Megaprosthetic reconstruction for malignant bone tumors: complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Pietro Ruggieri; Mario Mercuri; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2008

3.  The use of massive bone allograft with intramedullary free fibular flap for limb salvage in a pediatric and adolescent population.

Authors:  Steven L Moran; Alex Y Shin; Allen T Bishop
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Epidiaphyseal versus other intercalary allografts for tumors of the lower limb.

Authors:  R L M Deijkers; R M Bloem; H M Kroon; J B Van Lent; R Brand; A H M Taminiau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Allograft reconstruction of the humerus: Complications and revision surgery.

Authors:  Paul T Ogink; Frederik R Teunissen; Julie R Massier; Kevin A Raskin; Joseph H Schwab; Santiago A Lozano-Calderon
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 6.  Intercalary reconstructions after bone tumor resections: a review of treatments.

Authors:  Georgios N Panagopoulos; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Cyril Mauffrey; Jan Lesenský; Andrea Angelini; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Vasilios G Igoumenou; John Papanastassiou; Olga Savvidou; Pietro Ruggieri; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-05

7.  Local recurrence, survival and function after total femur resection and megaprosthetic reconstruction for bone sarcomas.

Authors:  Pietro Ruggieri; Giuseppe Bosco; Elisa Pala; Costantino Errani; Mario Mercuri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Failure rates and functional results for intercalary femur reconstructions after tumour resection.

Authors:  J I Albergo; L C Gaston; G L Farfalli; M Laitinen; M Parry; M A Ayerza; M Risk; L M Jeys; L A Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-03-08

9.  Biological reconstruction using massive bone allograft with intramedullary vascularized fibular flap after intercalary resection of humeral malignancy.

Authors:  Jing Li; Zhen Wang; Guo-Xian Pei; Zheng Guo
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Vascularised fibular grafts as a salvage procedure in failed intercalary reconstructions after bone tumour resection of the femur.

Authors:  Domenico Andrea Campanacci; Serena Puccini; Giuseppe Caff; Giovanni Beltrami; Andrea Piccioli; Marco Innocenti; Rodolfo Capanna
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.586

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.