Literature DB >> 20001129

Dissociating emotion-induced blindness and hypervision.

Bruno R Bocanegra1, René Zeelenberg.   

Abstract

Previous findings suggest that emotional stimuli sometimes improve (emotion-induced hypervision) and sometimes impair (emotion-induced blindness) the visual perception of subsequent neutral stimuli. We hypothesized that these differential carryover effects might be due to 2 distinct emotional influences in visual processing. On the one hand, emotional stimuli trigger a general enhancement in the efficiency of visual processing that can carry over onto other stimuli. On the other hand, emotional stimuli benefit from a stimulus-specific enhancement in later attentional processing at the expense of competing visual stimuli. We investigated whether detrimental (blindness) and beneficial (hypervision) carryover effects of emotion in perception can be dissociated within a single experimental paradigm. In 2 experiments, we manipulated the temporal competition for attention between an emotional cue word and a subsequent neutral target word by varying cue-target interstimulus interval (ISI) and cue visibility. Interestingly, emotional cues impaired target identification at short ISIs but improved target identification when competition was diminished by either increasing ISI or reducing cue visibility, suggesting that emotional significance of stimuli can improve and impair visual performance through distinct perceptual mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20001129     DOI: 10.1037/a0017749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  28 in total

1.  Differential interference effects of negative emotional states on subsequent semantic and perceptual processing.

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Marissa A Gorlick; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2011-12

2.  Negative arousal amplifies the effects of saliency in short-term memory.

Authors:  Matthew R Sutherland; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2012-05-28

3.  Fearful faces heighten the cortical representation of contextual threat.

Authors:  Matthias J Wieser; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Arousal-Biased Competition in Perception and Memory.

Authors:  Mara Mather; Matthew R Sutherland
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-03

5.  Negative arousal increases the effects of stimulus salience in older adults.

Authors:  Matthew R Sutherland; Mara Mather
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.645

6.  Emotional arousal amplifies the effects of biased competition in the brain.

Authors:  Tae-Ho Lee; Michiko Sakaki; Ruth Cheng; Ricardo Velasco; Mara Mather
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 7.  Making something out of nothing: neutral content modulates attention in generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Bunmi O Olatunji; Bethany G Ciesielski; Thomas Armstrong; Mimi Zhao; David H Zald
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 6.505

8.  Arousal (but not valence) amplifies the impact of salience.

Authors:  Matthew R Sutherland; Mara Mather
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  How arousal modulates the visual contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  Tae-Ho Lee; Jongsoo Baek; Zhong-Lin Lu; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2014-06-16

10.  Emotion modulation of visual attention: categorical and temporal characteristics.

Authors:  Bethany G Ciesielski; Thomas Armstrong; David H Zald; Bunmi O Olatunji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.