Literature DB >> 19998474

UK health-care professionals' experience of on-line learning techniques: a systematic review of qualitative data.

Christopher Carroll1, Andrew Booth, Diana Papaioannou, Anthea Sutton, Ruth Wong.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Continuing professional development and education is vital to the provision of better health services and outcomes. The aim of this study is to contribute to the evidence base by performing a systematic review of qualitative data from studies reporting health professionals' experience of e-learning. No such previous review has been published.
METHOD: A systematic review of qualitative data reporting UK health professionals' experiences of the ways in which on-line learning is delivered by higher education and other relevant institutions. Evidence synthesis was performed with the use of thematic analysis grounded in the data.
RESULTS: Literature searches identified 19 relevant studies. The subjects of the studies were nurses, midwives, and allied professions (8 studies), general practitioners and hospital doctors (6 studies), and a range of different health practitioners (5 studies). The majority of courses were stand-alone continuing professional development modules. Five key themes emerged from the data: peer communication, flexibility, support, knowledge validation, and course presentation and design. DISCUSSION: The effectiveness of on-line learning is mediated by the learning experience. If they are to enhance health professionals' experience of e-learning, courses need to address presentation and course design; they must be flexible, offer mechanisms for both support and rapid assessment, and develop effective and efficient means of communication, especially among the students themselves.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19998474     DOI: 10.1002/chp.20041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof        ISSN: 0894-1912            Impact factor:   1.355


  19 in total

1.  Virtual Learning Environment in Continuing Education for Nursing in Oncology: an Experimental Study.

Authors:  Maria das Graças Silva Matsubara; Edvane Birelo Lopes De Domenico
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Education in wrist arthroscopy: past, present and future.

Authors:  M C Obdeijn; N Bavinck; C Mathoulin; C M A M van der Horst; M P Schijven; G J M Tuijthof
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Developing blended online and classroom strategies to deliver an occupational health nursing overview course in a multi-state region in the United States.

Authors:  A B de Castro; Erin Shapleigh; Annie Bruck; Mary K Salazar
Journal:  Workplace Health Saf       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.413

Review 4.  "Best fit" framework synthesis: refining the method.

Authors:  Christopher Carroll; Andrew Booth; Joanna Leaviss; Jo Rick
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  The challenges of trying to increase preventive healthcare for children in general practice: results of a feasibility study.

Authors:  Karyn E Alexander; Bianca Brijnath; Danielle Mazza
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Does peer learning or higher levels of e-learning improve learning abilities? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Bjarne Skjødt Worm; Kenneth Jensen
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2013-11-13

7.  Evaluating the online platform of a blended-learning pharmacist continuing education degree program.

Authors:  Kerry Wilbur
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-06-08

8.  Using mixed methods evaluation to assess the feasibility of online clinical training in evidence based interventions: a case study of cognitive behavioural treatment for low back pain.

Authors:  Helen Richmond; Amanda M Hall; Zara Hansen; Esther Williamson; David Davies; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Factors influencing the implementation, adoption, use, sustainability and scalability of eLearning for family medicine specialty training: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Živa Cotič; Rebecca Rees; Petra A Wark; Josip Car
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-19

10.  Evaluation of Technology-Enhanced Learning Programs for Health Care Professionals: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Pam Nicoll; Sandra MacRury; Hugo C van Woerden; Keith Smyth
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.