Literature DB >> 19995841

Assessing visual pathway function in multiple sclerosis patients with multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Michal Laron1, Han Cheng, Bin Zhang, Jade S Schiffman, Rosa A Tang, Laura J Frishman.   

Abstract

Multifocal visual evoked potentials provide a topographic measure of visual response amplitude and latency. The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the multifocal visual evoked potential technique in detecting visual abnormalities in patients with multiple sclerosis. Multifocal visual evoked potentials were recorded from 74 patients with multiple sclerosis with history of optic neuritis (MS-ON, n = 74 eyes) or without (MS-no-ON, n = 71 eyes), and 50 normal subjects (controls, n = 100 eyes) using a 60-sector pattern reversal dartboard stimulus (VERIS). Amplitude and latency for each sector were compared with normative data and assigned probabilities. Size and location of clusters of adjacent abnormal sectors (p < 0.05) were examined. Mean response amplitudes were (+/- SE) 0.39 +/- 0.02, 0.53 +/- 0.02, and 0.60 +/- 0.01 for MS-ON, MS-no-ON, and control groups, respectively, with significant differences between all groups (p < 0.0001). Mean latencies (ms; +/-SE relative to normative data) were 12.7 +/- 1.3 (MS-ON), 4.3 +/- 1.1 (MS-no-ON), and 0.3 +/- 0.4 (controls); group differences again significant (p < 0.0001). Half the MS-ON eyes had clusters larger than five sectors compared with 13% in MS-no-ON and 2% in controls. Abnormal sectors were distributed diffusely, although the largest cluster was smaller than 15 sectors in two-thirds of MS-ON eyes. Cluster criteria combining amplitude and latency showed an area of 0.96 under the receiver operating characteristic curve, yielding a criterion with 91% sensitivity and 95% specificity. We conclude that the multifocal visual evoked potential provides high sensitivity and specificity in detecting abnormalities in visual function in multiple sclerosis patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19995841      PMCID: PMC2933374          DOI: 10.1177/1352458509350470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler        ISSN: 1352-4585            Impact factor:   6.312


  41 in total

1.  Effect of temporal sparseness and dichoptic presentation on multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Andrew C James; Rasa Ruseckaite; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Multifocal objective perimetry compared with Humphrey full-threshold perimetry in patients with optic neuritis.

Authors:  Nima Pakrou; Robert Casson; Andrew Kaines; Dinesh Selva
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  Optical coherence tomography versus automated perimetry for follow-up of optic neuritis.

Authors:  Susana Noval; Inés Contreras; Gema Rebolleda; Francisco J Muñoz-Negrete
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2006-12

4.  Improvement in conduction velocity after optic neuritis measured with the multifocal VEP.

Authors:  E Bo Yang; Donald C Hood; Chris Rodarte; Xian Zhang; Jeffrey G Odel; Myles M Behrens
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Electrophysiological evidence for heterogeneity of lesions in optic neuritis.

Authors:  Alexander Klistorner; Stuart Graham; Clare Fraser; Raymond Garrick; Tan Nguyen; Michael Paine; Justin O'Day; John Grigg; Hemamalini Arvind; Frank A Billson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Correlation between full-field and multifocal VEPs in optic neuritis.

Authors:  Alexander Klistorner; Clare Fraser; Raymond Garrick; Stuart Graham; Hemamalini Arvind
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field.

Authors:  H A Baseler; E E Sutter; S A Klein; T Carney
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-01

8.  Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP.

Authors:  Brad Fortune; Xian Zhang; Donald C Hood; Shaban Demirel; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Visual symptoms after optic neuritis. Results from the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial.

Authors:  P A Cleary; R W Beck; L B Bourque; J C Backlund; P H Miskala
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.042

10.  The relationship between visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Han Cheng; Michal Laron; Jade S Schiffman; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  17 in total

1.  Reproducibility of multifocal VEP latency using different stimulus presentations.

Authors:  Prema Sriram; Alexander Klistorner; Hemamalini Arvind; Stuart L Graham
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Tracking changes over time in retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Divya Narayanan; Han Cheng; Karlie N Bonem; Roberto Saenz; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  Multifocal visual evoked potentials and contrast sensitivity correlate with ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Divya Narayanan; Han Cheng; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Comparison of multifocal visual evoked potential, standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography in assessing visual pathway in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Michal Laron; Han Cheng; Bin Zhang; Jade S Schiffman; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 5.  Vision in multiple sclerosis: the story, structure-function correlations, and models for neuroprotection.

Authors:  Reiko E Sakai; Daniel J Feller; Kristin M Galetta; Steven L Galetta; Laura J Balcer
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Reproducibility of multifocal visual evoked potential and traditional visual evoked potential in normal and multiple sclerosis eyes.

Authors:  Divya Narayanan; Han Cheng; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Comparison of optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry measurements in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Amanda Quelly; Han Cheng; Michal Laron; Jade S Schiffman; Rosa A Tang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Mechanism of delayed conduction of fellow eyes in patients with optic neuritis.

Authors:  Daniah Alshowaeir; Con Yiannikas; Clare Fraser; Alexander Klistorner
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Longitudinal Evaluation of Visual Function in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Divya Narayanan; Han Cheng; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Multifocal visual evoked potential in optic neuritis, ischemic optic neuropathy and compressive optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Manju Jayaraman; Rashmin Anilkumar Gandhi; Priya Ravi; Parveen Sen
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.