Literature DB >> 19969335

Recent time trends in the epidemiology of stage IV prostate cancer in the United States: analysis of data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.

Karynsa Cetin1, Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer, Jon P Fryzek, Richard Markus, Michael A Carducci.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe recent epidemiologic trends in stage IV prostate cancer. Although advances in screening and diagnostic techniques have led to earlier detection of prostate cancer, a portion of patients still present with late-stage disease.
METHODS: Population-based cancer registry data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (cases from 1988 to 2003, follow-up through 2005) were used to calculate annual age-adjusted incidence rates of stage IV prostate cancer (overall and for the subset presenting with distant metastases) and to assess time trends in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics and survival.
RESULTS: From 1988 to 2003, the age-adjusted incidence of stage IV prostate cancer significantly declined by 6.4% each year. The proportion of men diagnosed at younger ages, with poorly differentiated tumors, or who underwent a radical prostatectomy significantly increased over time. Five-year relative survival improved across the study period (from 41.6% to 62.3%), particularly in those diagnosed at younger ages or with moderately to well-differentiated tumors. Later years of diagnosis were independently associated with a decreased risk of death (from all causes and from prostate cancer specifically) after controlling for important patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Tumor grade and receipt of radical prostatectomy appeared to be the strongest independent prognostic indicators. Temporal trends were similar in the subset presenting with distant metastases, except that no significant improvement in survival was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: As younger men may expect to live longer with advanced prostate cancer, there remains a need to widen the range of therapeutic and supportive care options. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19969335      PMCID: PMC4249683          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.07.1360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  20 in total

1.  Analysis of recent trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality.

Authors:  L K Dennis; M I Resnick
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  Determining cause of death in prostate cancer: are death certificates valid?

Authors:  D F Penson; P C Albertsen; P S Nelson; M Barry; J L Stanford
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-12-05       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Impact of screening on incidence and mortality of prostate cancer in the United States.

Authors:  A L Potosky; E J Feuer; D L Levin
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Grade migration in prostate cancer: an analysis using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry.

Authors:  A B Jani; V A Master; P J Rossi; S L Liauw; P A S Johnstone
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 5.554

5.  A midpoint assessment of the American Cancer Society challenge goal to halve the U.S. cancer mortality rates between the years 1990 and 2015.

Authors:  Tim Byers; Ermilo Barrera; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Lisa A Newman; Carolyn D Runowicz; Stephen F Sener; Michael J Thun; Sara Winborn; Richard C Wender
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Advances in prostate cancer chemotherapy: a new era begins.

Authors:  Kenneth J Pienta; David C Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Comparison of stage migration patterns between Europe and the USA: an analysis of 11 350 men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Gallina; Felix K-H Chun; Nazareno Suardi; James A Eastham; Paul Perrotte; Markus Graefen; Georg Hutterer; Hartwig Huland; Eric A Klein; Alwyn Reuther; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti; Shahrokh F Shariat; Claus G Roehrborn; Alexandre de la Taille; Laurent Salomon; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Pathologic stage migration has slowed in the late PSA era.

Authors:  Fei Dong; Alwyn M Reuther; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Ming Zhou; Patrick A Kupelian; Eric A Klein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Improved stage and grade-specific progression-free survival rates after radical prostatectomy in the PSA era.

Authors:  Naresh V Desireddi; Kimberly A Roehl; Stacy Loeb; Xiaoying Yu; Christopher R Griffin; Shilajit K Kundu; Misop Han; William J Catalona
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  16 in total

1.  Patient-centered or 'central' patient: Raising the veil of ignorance over randomization.

Authors:  Anirban Basu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  The prostate cancer conundrum revisited: treatment changes and prostate cancer mortality declines.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Roman Gulati; Alex Tsodikov; Elisabeth M Wever; David F Penson; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Jeffrey Katcher; Gerrit Draisma; Eric J Feuer; Harry J de Koning; Angela B Mariotto
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Invasive procedures in the elderly after stage IV cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Alvin C Kwok; Yue-Yung Hu; Christopher M Dodgion; Wei Jiang; Gladys V Ting; Nathan Taback; Stuart R Lipsitz; Jane C Weeks; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  The impact of PLCO control arm contamination on perceived PSA screening efficacy.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Alex Tsodikov; Elisabeth M Wever; Angela B Mariotto; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Jeffrey Katcher; Harry J de Koning; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 5.  C-reactive protein as a biomarker for urological cancers.

Authors:  Kazutaka Saito; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Limitations of basing screening policies on screening trials: The US Preventive Services Task Force and Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Roman Gulati; Matt R Cooperberg; David M Penson; Noel S Weiss; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Low rates of bone mineral density measurement in Medicare beneficiaries with prostate cancer initiating androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Maria E Suarez-Almazor; Prashanth Peddi; Ruili Luo; Hoang T Nguyen; Linda S Elting
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  High-cost imaging in elderly patients with stage IV cancer.

Authors:  Yue-Yung Hu; Alvin C Kwok; Wei Jiang; Nathan Taback; Elizabeth T Loggers; Gladys V Ting; Stuart R Lipsitz; Jane C Weeks; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT for primary staging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wojciech Cytawa; Anna Katharina Seitz; Stefan Kircher; Kazuhito Fukushima; Johannes Tran-Gia; Andreas Schirbel; Tomasz Bandurski; Piotr Lass; Markus Krebs; Wojciech Połom; Marcin Matuszewski; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Andreas K Buck; Hubert Kübler; Constantin Lapa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Lifetime economic burden of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael E Stokes; Jack Ishak; Irina Proskorovsky; Libby K Black; Yijian Huang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.