OBJECTIVES: To describe recent epidemiologic trends in stage IV prostate cancer. Although advances in screening and diagnostic techniques have led to earlier detection of prostate cancer, a portion of patients still present with late-stage disease. METHODS: Population-based cancer registry data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (cases from 1988 to 2003, follow-up through 2005) were used to calculate annual age-adjusted incidence rates of stage IV prostate cancer (overall and for the subset presenting with distant metastases) and to assess time trends in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics and survival. RESULTS: From 1988 to 2003, the age-adjusted incidence of stage IV prostate cancer significantly declined by 6.4% each year. The proportion of men diagnosed at younger ages, with poorly differentiated tumors, or who underwent a radical prostatectomy significantly increased over time. Five-year relative survival improved across the study period (from 41.6% to 62.3%), particularly in those diagnosed at younger ages or with moderately to well-differentiated tumors. Later years of diagnosis were independently associated with a decreased risk of death (from all causes and from prostate cancer specifically) after controlling for important patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Tumor grade and receipt of radical prostatectomy appeared to be the strongest independent prognostic indicators. Temporal trends were similar in the subset presenting with distant metastases, except that no significant improvement in survival was observed. CONCLUSIONS: As younger men may expect to live longer with advanced prostate cancer, there remains a need to widen the range of therapeutic and supportive care options. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVES: To describe recent epidemiologic trends in stage IV prostate cancer. Although advances in screening and diagnostic techniques have led to earlier detection of prostate cancer, a portion of patients still present with late-stage disease. METHODS: Population-based cancer registry data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (cases from 1988 to 2003, follow-up through 2005) were used to calculate annual age-adjusted incidence rates of stage IV prostate cancer (overall and for the subset presenting with distant metastases) and to assess time trends in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics and survival. RESULTS: From 1988 to 2003, the age-adjusted incidence of stage IV prostate cancer significantly declined by 6.4% each year. The proportion of men diagnosed at younger ages, with poorly differentiated tumors, or who underwent a radical prostatectomy significantly increased over time. Five-year relative survival improved across the study period (from 41.6% to 62.3%), particularly in those diagnosed at younger ages or with moderately to well-differentiated tumors. Later years of diagnosis were independently associated with a decreased risk of death (from all causes and from prostate cancer specifically) after controlling for important patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Tumor grade and receipt of radical prostatectomy appeared to be the strongest independent prognostic indicators. Temporal trends were similar in the subset presenting with distant metastases, except that no significant improvement in survival was observed. CONCLUSIONS: As younger men may expect to live longer with advanced prostate cancer, there remains a need to widen the range of therapeutic and supportive care options. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Tim Byers; Ermilo Barrera; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Lisa A Newman; Carolyn D Runowicz; Stephen F Sener; Michael J Thun; Sara Winborn; Richard C Wender Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Andrea Gallina; Felix K-H Chun; Nazareno Suardi; James A Eastham; Paul Perrotte; Markus Graefen; Georg Hutterer; Hartwig Huland; Eric A Klein; Alwyn Reuther; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti; Shahrokh F Shariat; Claus G Roehrborn; Alexandre de la Taille; Laurent Salomon; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: BJU Int Date: 2008-04-16 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Fei Dong; Alwyn M Reuther; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Ming Zhou; Patrick A Kupelian; Eric A Klein Journal: Urology Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Naresh V Desireddi; Kimberly A Roehl; Stacy Loeb; Xiaoying Yu; Christopher R Griffin; Shilajit K Kundu; Misop Han; William J Catalona Journal: Urology Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Ruth Etzioni; Roman Gulati; Alex Tsodikov; Elisabeth M Wever; David F Penson; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Jeffrey Katcher; Gerrit Draisma; Eric J Feuer; Harry J de Koning; Angela B Mariotto Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Alvin C Kwok; Yue-Yung Hu; Christopher M Dodgion; Wei Jiang; Gladys V Ting; Nathan Taback; Stuart R Lipsitz; Jane C Weeks; Caprice C Greenberg Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Roman Gulati; Alex Tsodikov; Elisabeth M Wever; Angela B Mariotto; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Jeffrey Katcher; Harry J de Koning; Ruth Etzioni Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2012-04-10 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Ruth Etzioni; Roman Gulati; Matt R Cooperberg; David M Penson; Noel S Weiss; Ian M Thompson Journal: Med Care Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Maria E Suarez-Almazor; Prashanth Peddi; Ruili Luo; Hoang T Nguyen; Linda S Elting Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Yue-Yung Hu; Alvin C Kwok; Wei Jiang; Nathan Taback; Elizabeth T Loggers; Gladys V Ting; Stuart R Lipsitz; Jane C Weeks; Caprice C Greenberg Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Wojciech Cytawa; Anna Katharina Seitz; Stefan Kircher; Kazuhito Fukushima; Johannes Tran-Gia; Andreas Schirbel; Tomasz Bandurski; Piotr Lass; Markus Krebs; Wojciech Połom; Marcin Matuszewski; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Andreas K Buck; Hubert Kübler; Constantin Lapa Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Michael E Stokes; Jack Ishak; Irina Proskorovsky; Libby K Black; Yijian Huang Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-12-28 Impact factor: 2.655