Literature DB >> 18068453

Improved stage and grade-specific progression-free survival rates after radical prostatectomy in the PSA era.

Naresh V Desireddi1, Kimberly A Roehl, Stacy Loeb, Xiaoying Yu, Christopher R Griffin, Shilajit K Kundu, Misop Han, William J Catalona.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Since the initiation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, the progression-free survival (PFS) rates after radical prostatectomy have markedly improved. However, few studies have evaluated whether PFS has improved for stage and grade-matched patients. Our objective was to examine differences in PFS after radical prostatectomy between the pre-PSA era (before 1992) and the PSA era, controlling for tumor stage and grade.
METHODS: From 1983 to 2003, 3456 men underwent radical prostatectomy by one surgeon. The 10-year PFS rates were calculated for each era and stratified by pathologic tumor stage and grade. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to show biochemical PFS over time.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients with pathologically organ-confined disease increased from 64% to 69%, consistent with stage migration. The PFS rate in the PSA era was 87%, 63%, 58%, and 31% versus 71%, 63%, 47%, and 19% in the pre-PSA era for Stage pT2R0, pT3R0, pT2-T3R1, and pT3c/N1 disease, respectively. The PFS rate stratified by Gleason grade in the PSA era was 84%, 63%, and 37% versus 66%, 49%, and 32% in the pre-PSA era for Gleason grade less than 7, 7, and 8 to 10, respectively. The 10-year PFS rate for organ-confined disease improved from 70% in the pre-PSA era to 86% in the PSA era.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with radical prostatectomy in the PSA era have improved survival outcomes when controlling for pathologic stage and grade. This is likely attributed to the earlier detection of cancer through PSA screening, better identification of patients amenable to curative therapy, and the effects of lead-time bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18068453     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.06.1119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  10 in total

1.  Autologous retro-pubic urethral sling: a novel, quick, intra-operative technique to improve continence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sanoj Punnen; K Clint Cary; Allison S Glass; Janet E Cowan; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-08-15

2.  Incremental value of high b value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3-T for prediction of extracapsular extension in patients with prostate cancer: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Ayumu Kido; Tsutomu Tamada; Teruki Sone; Naoki Kanomata; Yoshiyuki Miyaji; Akira Yamamoto; Katsuyoshi Ito
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Among potent men post radical prostatectomy, does the need for phosphodiesterase inhibitors have an impact on sexual bother scores?

Authors:  Sanoj Punnen; Matthew R Cooperberg; Natalia Sadetsky; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Recent time trends in the epidemiology of stage IV prostate cancer in the United States: analysis of data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.

Authors:  Karynsa Cetin; Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Jon P Fryzek; Richard Markus; Michael A Carducci
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  [Role of lymph node dissection in prostate cancer].

Authors:  T Schlomm; C Börgermann; H Heinzer; H Rübben; H Huland; M Graefen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Perceived family history risk and symptomatic diagnosis of prostate cancer: the North Carolina Prostate Cancer Outcomes study.

Authors:  Pamela Spain; William R Carpenter; James A Talcott; Jack A Clark; Young Kyung Do; Robert J Hamilton; Joseph A Galanko; Anne Jackman; Paul A Godley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Caring for the Uninsured with Prostate Cancer: A Comparison of Four Policy Alternatives in California.

Authors:  Jonathan Bergman; Susan Logan; Arlene Fink; David A Ganz; Mark A Peterson; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2010-02

8.  PCSD1, a new patient-derived model of bone metastatic prostate cancer, is castrate-resistant in the bone-niche.

Authors:  Elana Godebu; Michelle Muldong; Amy Strasner; Christina N Wu; Seung Chol Park; Jason R Woo; Wenxue Ma; Michael A Liss; Takeshi Hirata; Omer Raheem; Nicholas A Cacalano; Anna A Kulidjian; Christina A M Jamieson
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 9.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: current concepts.

Authors:  Leonardo Kayat Bittencourt; Daniel Hausmann; Natalia Sabaneeff; Emerson Leandro Gasparetto; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

Review 10.  [Interactions between radical prostatovesiculectomy and diagnosis of prostate cancer : A medical-historical inventory on the occasion of 20 years of robot-assisted treatment].

Authors:  Wolfgang Otto; Wolf F Wieland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 0.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.