Literature DB >> 19967709

Heterozygosity and mutation rate: evidence for an interaction and its implications: the potential for meiotic gene conversions to influence both mutation rate and distribution.

William Amos1.   

Abstract

If natural selection chose where new mutations occur it might well favour placing them near existing polymorphisms, thereby avoiding disruption of areas that work while adding novelty to regions where variation is tolerated or even beneficial. Such a system could operate if heterozygous sites are recognised and 'repaired' during the initial stages of crossing over. Such repairs involve an extra round of DNA replication, providing an opportunity for further mutations, thereby raising the local mutation rate. If so, the changes in heterozygosity that occur when populations grow or shrink could feed back to modulate both the rate and the distribution of mutations. Here, I review evidence from isozymes, microsatellites and single nucleotide polymorphisms that this potential is realised in real populations. I then consider the likely implications, focusing particularly on how these processes might affect microsatellites, concluding that heterozygosity does impact on the rate and distribution of mutations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19967709     DOI: 10.1002/bies.200900108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  30 in total

1.  Mutation biases and mutation rate variation around very short human microsatellites revealed by human-chimpanzee-orangutan genomic sequence alignments.

Authors:  William Amos
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Population-specific links between heterozygosity and the rate human microsatellite evolution.

Authors:  William Amos
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Inter-allelic interactions play a major role in microsatellite evolution.

Authors:  William Amos; Danica Kosanović; Anders Eriksson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Heterozygosity increases microsatellite mutation rate.

Authors:  William Amos
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Even small SNP clusters are non-randomly distributed: is this evidence of mutational non-independence?

Authors:  William Amos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Genetics: Feedforward loop for diversity.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Parent-progeny sequencing indicates higher mutation rates in heterozygotes.

Authors:  Sihai Yang; Long Wang; Ju Huang; Xiaohui Zhang; Yang Yuan; Jian-Qun Chen; Laurence D Hurst; Dacheng Tian
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Evidence for heterozygote instability in microsatellite loci in house wrens.

Authors:  Brian S Masters; L Scott Johnson; Bonnie G P Johnson; Jessica L Brubaker; Scott K Sakaluk; Charles F Thompson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Using human demographic history to infer natural selection reveals contrasting patterns on different families of immune genes.

Authors:  William Amos; Clare Bryant
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  GATA3 mutations found in breast cancers may be associated with aberrant nuclear localization, reduced transactivation and cell invasiveness.

Authors:  Katherine U Gaynor; Irina V Grigorieva; Michael D Allen; Christopher T Esapa; Rosemary A Head; Preethi Gopinath; Paul T Christie; M Andrew Nesbit; J Louise Jones; Rajesh V Thakker
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.869

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.