Literature DB >> 23435732

GATA3 mutations found in breast cancers may be associated with aberrant nuclear localization, reduced transactivation and cell invasiveness.

Katherine U Gaynor1, Irina V Grigorieva, Michael D Allen, Christopher T Esapa, Rosemary A Head, Preethi Gopinath, Paul T Christie, M Andrew Nesbit, J Louise Jones, Rajesh V Thakker.   

Abstract

Somatic and germline mutations in the dual zinc-finger transcription factor GATA3 are associated with breast cancers expressing the estrogen receptor (ER) and the autosomal dominant hypoparathyroidism-deafness-renal dysplasia syndrome, respectively. To elucidate the role of GATA3 in breast tumorigenesis, we investigated 40 breast cancers that expressed ER, for GATA3 mutations. Six different heterozygous GATA3 somatic mutations were identified in eight tumors, and these consisted of: a frameshifting deletion/insertion (944_945delGGinsAGC), an in-frame deletion of a key arginine residue (991_993delAGG), a seven-nucleotide frameshifting insertion (991_992insTGGAGGA), a frameshifting deletion (1196_1197delGA), and two frameshifting single nucleotide insertions (1224_1225insG found in three tumors and 1224_1225insA). Five of the eight mutations occurred in tumors that retained GATA3 immunostaining, indicating that absence of GATA3 immunostaining is an unreliable predictor of the presence of GATA3 mutations. Luciferase reporter assays, electrophoretic mobility shift assays, immunofluorescence, invasion and proliferation assays demonstrated that the GATA3 mutations resulted in loss (or reduction) of DNA binding, decrease in transactivational activity, and alterations in invasiveness but not proliferation. The 991_992insTGGAGGA (Arg330 frameshift) mutation led to a loss of nuclear localization, yet the 991_993delAGG (Arg330deletion) retained nuclear localization. Investigation of the putative nuclear localization signal (NLS) sites showed that the NLS of GATA3 does not conform to either a classical mono- or bi-partite signal, but contains multiple cooperative NLS elements residing around the N-terminal zinc-finger which comprises residues 264-288. Thus, approximately 20 % ER-positive breast cancers have somatic GATA3 mutations that lead to a loss of GATA3 transactivation activity and altered cell invasiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23435732     DOI: 10.1007/s12672-013-0138-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Cancer        ISSN: 1868-8497            Impact factor:   3.869


  58 in total

Review 1.  The zinc finger-containing transcription factors GATA-4, -5, and -6. Ubiquitously expressed regulators of tissue-specific gene expression.

Authors:  J D Molkentin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Somatic sequence alterations in twenty-one genes selected by expression profile analysis of breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Stephen J Chanock; Laurie Burdett; Meredith Yeager; Victor Llaca; Anita Langerød; Shafaq Presswalla; Rolf Kaaresen; Robert L Strausberg; Daniela S Gerhard; Vessela Kristensen; Charles M Perou; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

3.  Gata3-deficient mice develop parathyroid abnormalities due to dysregulation of the parathyroid-specific transcription factor Gcm2.

Authors:  Irina V Grigorieva; Samantha Mirczuk; Katherine U Gaynor; M Andrew Nesbit; Elena F Grigorieva; Qiaozhi Wei; Asif Ali; Rebecca J Fairclough; Joanna M Stacey; Michael J Stechman; Radu Mihai; Dorota Kurek; William D Fraser; Tertius Hough; Brian G Condie; Nancy Manley; Frank Grosveld; Rajesh V Thakker
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Clinical and functional significance of α9β1 integrin expression in breast cancer: a novel cell-surface marker of the basal phenotype that promotes tumour cell invasion.

Authors:  Michael D Allen; Reza Vaziri; Michael Green; Claude Chelala; Adam R Brentnall; Sally Dreger; Sabarinath Vallath; Harriet Nitch-Smith; Jane Hayward; Robert Carpenter; Deborah L Holliday; Rosemary A Walker; Ian R Hart; J Louise Jones
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 5.  GATA transcription factors: key regulators of hematopoiesis.

Authors:  M J Weiss; S H Orkin
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  A short amino acid sequence able to specify nuclear location.

Authors:  D Kalderon; B L Roberts; W D Richardson; A E Smith
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Fog2 excision in mice leads to premature mammary gland involution and reduced Esr1 gene expression.

Authors:  N L Manuylov; F O Smagulova; S G Tevosian
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-02-19       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Pathway signature and cellular differentiation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Han W Tun; Laura A Marlow; Christina A von Roemeling; Simon J Cooper; Pamela Kreinest; Kevin Wu; Bruce A Luxon; Mala Sinha; Panos Z Anastasiadis; John A Copland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Resistance to transforming growth factor beta and activin due to reduced receptor expression in human breast tumor cell lines.

Authors:  E Kalkhoven; B A Roelen; J P de Winter; C L Mummery; A J van den Eijnden-van Raaij; P T van der Saag; B van der Burg
Journal:  Cell Growth Differ       Date:  1995-09

10.  The landscape of cancer genes and mutational processes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Philip J Stephens; Patrick S Tarpey; Helen Davies; Peter Van Loo; Chris Greenman; David C Wedge; Serena Nik-Zainal; Sancha Martin; Ignacio Varela; Graham R Bignell; Lucy R Yates; Elli Papaemmanuil; David Beare; Adam Butler; Angela Cheverton; John Gamble; Jonathan Hinton; Mingming Jia; Alagu Jayakumar; David Jones; Calli Latimer; King Wai Lau; Stuart McLaren; David J McBride; Andrew Menzies; Laura Mudie; Keiran Raine; Roland Rad; Michael Spencer Chapman; Jon Teague; Douglas Easton; Anita Langerød; Ming Ta Michael Lee; Chen-Yang Shen; Benita Tan Kiat Tee; Bernice Wong Huimin; Annegien Broeks; Ana Cristina Vargas; Gulisa Turashvili; John Martens; Aquila Fatima; Penelope Miron; Suet-Feung Chin; Gilles Thomas; Sandrine Boyault; Odette Mariani; Sunil R Lakhani; Marc van de Vijver; Laura van 't Veer; John Foekens; Christine Desmedt; Christos Sotiriou; Andrew Tutt; Carlos Caldas; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Samuel A J R Aparicio; Anne Vincent Salomon; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Andrea L Richardson; Peter J Campbell; P Andrew Futreal; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  15 in total

1.  Mutant GATA3 Actively Promotes the Growth of Normal and Malignant Mammary Cells.

Authors:  Natasha Emmanuel; Kristopher A Lofgren; Esther A Peterson; David R Meier; Eric H Jung; Paraic A Kenny
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.480

2.  ZNF503/Zpo2 drives aggressive breast cancer progression by down-regulation of GATA3 expression.

Authors:  Payam Shahi; Chih-Yang Wang; Devon A Lawson; Euan M Slorach; Angela Lu; Ying Yu; Ming-Derg Lai; Hugo Gonzalez Velozo; Zena Werb
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  GATA3 Truncating Mutations Promote Cistromic Re-Programming In Vitro, but Not Mammary Tumor Formation in Mice.

Authors:  Lisette M Cornelissen; Roebi de Bruijn; Linda Henneman; Yongsoo Kim; Wilbert Zwart; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.673

4.  Next-generation sequencing revealed recurrent ZFPM1 mutations in encapsulated papillary carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Xuguang Liu; Xin Huang; Yan Bai; Zhiwen Zhang; Tiefeng Jin; Huanwen Wu; Zhiyong Liang
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-05-18

5.  Structural and conformational changes induced by missense variants in the zinc finger domains of GATA3 involved in breast cancer.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar; Rahul Kumar; Pranay Tanwar; S V S Deo; Sandeep Mathur; Usha Agarwal; Showket Hussain
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Genomic aberrations in young and elderly  breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hatem A Azim; Bastien Nguyen; Sylvain Brohée; Gabriele Zoppoli; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Breast tumor specific mutation in GATA3 affects physiological mechanisms regulating transcription factor turnover.

Authors:  Aleksandra B Adomas; Sara A Grimm; Christine Malone; Motoki Takaku; Jennifer K Sims; Paul A Wade
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Shift in GATA3 functions, and GATA3 mutations, control progression and clinical presentation in breast cancer.

Authors:  Helit Cohen; Rotem Ben-Hamo; Moriah Gidoni; Ilana Yitzhaki; Renana Kozol; Alona Zilberberg; Sol Efroni
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Enhancer alterations in cancer: a source for a cell identity crisis.

Authors:  Ken J Kron; Swneke D Bailey; Mathieu Lupien
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  Genetic variant rs1058240 at the microRNA-binding site in the GATA3 gene may regulate its mRNA expression.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Fenxia Chen; Jun Gu; Wenwen Zhang; Jiayan Luo; Xiaoxiang Guan
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2014-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.