Literature DB >> 19966263

Target-distractor interference in the attentional blink implicates the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system.

Christopher M Warren1, Andreas T Breuer, Justin Kantner, Daniel Fiset, Caroline Blais, Michael E J Masson.   

Abstract

We provide evidence that the locus coeruleus-norephinephrine (LC-NE) system is the neurophysiological basis of the attentional blink. The attentional blink refers to decreased accuracy for reporting the second of two targets in a rapid serial visual presentation of distractors. The LC-NE account of the attentional blink posits that targets elicit a facilitative LC-NE system response that is available for the first target but subsequently unavailable to the second, due to the autoinhibitory nature of the LC-NE system. We propose a modification of the LC-NE account, suggesting that the LC-NE system response is elicited by interference between mutually exclusive responses demanded by temporally proximal targets and distractors. We increased the interference between the first target and the following distractor by reducing the time between them. For identifying the second target this high-interference condition yielded a benefit up to 200 msec after onset of the first, followed by a decrease in accuracy. Consistent with our modification of the LC-NE account, this result suggests a temporarily enhanced LC-NE system response to increased target-distractor interference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19966263     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.6.1106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  10 in total

1.  Neural correlates of the attentional blink.

Authors:  R Marois; M M Chun; J C Gore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  The time course of competition for attention: attention is initially labile.

Authors:  Mary C Potter; Adrian Staub; Daniel H O'Connor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? .

Authors:  J E Raymond; K L Shapiro; K M Arnell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The role of the locus coeruleus in mediating the attentional blink: a neurocomputational theory.

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Mark S Gilzenrat; Benjamin D Holmes; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

Review 5.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance.

Authors:  Gary Aston-Jones; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Top-down controlled, delayed selection in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Mark R Nieuwenstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The attentional blink is governed by a temporary loss of control.

Authors:  Jun-Ichiro Kawahara; Takatsune Kumada; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

Review 8.  A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Does failure to mask T1 cause lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink?

Authors:  Elwyn W Martin; Kimron L Shapiro
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-04

10.  Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink.

Authors:  E K Vogel; S J Luck; K L Shapiro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Spotting rare items makes the brain "blink" harder: Evidence from pupillometry.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Juan D Guevara Pinto
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Reduced susceptibility to the attentional blink in psychopathic offenders: implications for the attention bottleneck hypothesis.

Authors:  Richard C Wolf; Ryan W Carpenter; Christopher M Warren; Joshua D Zeier; Arielle R Baskin-Sommers; Joseph P Newman
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Neurocognitive function in dopamine-β-hydroxylase deficiency.

Authors:  Marieke Jepma; Jaap Deinum; Christopher L Asplund; Serge Arb Rombouts; Jouke T Tamsma; Nathanja Tjeerdema; Michiel M Spapé; Emily M Garland; David Robertson; Jacques Wm Lenders; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Exaggerated Attention Blink Response in Prisoners with Externalizing.

Authors:  Arielle Baskin-Sommers; Richard Wolf; Joshua Buckholtz; Christopher Warren; Joseph Newman
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2012-08-18

5.  The Impact of Deliberative Strategy Dissociates ERP Components Related to Conflict Processing vs. Reinforcement Learning.

Authors:  Christopher M Warren; Clay B Holroyd
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Effects of clonidine and scopolamine on multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  Stephen B R E Brown; Heleen A Slagter; Martijn S van Noorden; Erik J Giltay; Nic J A van der Wee; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.530

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.