Literature DB >> 31222658

Spotting rare items makes the brain "blink" harder: Evidence from pupillometry.

Megan H Papesh1, Juan D Guevara Pinto2.   

Abstract

In many visual search tasks (e.g., cancer screening, airport baggage inspections), the most serious search targets occur infrequently. As an ironic side effect, when observers finally encounter important objects (e.g., a weapon in baggage), they often fail to notice them, a phenomenon known as the low-prevalence effect (LPE). Although many studies have investigated LPE search errors, we investigated the attentional consequences of successful rare target detection. Using an attentional blink paradigm, we manipulated how often observers encountered the first serial target (T1), then measured its effects on their ability to detect a following target (T2). Across two experiments, we show that the LPE is more than just an inflated miss rate: When observers successfully detected rare targets, they were less likely to spot subsequent targets. Using pupillometry to index locus-coeruleus (LC) mediated attentional engagement, Experiment 2 confirmed that an LC refractory period mediates the attentional blink (`Nieuwenhuis, Gilzenrat, Holmes, & Cohen, 2005, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134[3], 291-307), and that these effects emerge relatively quickly following T1 onset. Moreover, in both behavioral and pupil analyses, we found that detecting low-prevalence targets exacerbates the LC refractory period. Consequences for theories of the LPE are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional blink; Locus coeruleus; Low-prevalence effect; Pupillometry

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31222658      PMCID: PMC6858538          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01777-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  67 in total

1.  Simplified dynamics in a model of noradrenergic modulation of cognitive performance.

Authors:  Mark S Gilzenrat; Benjamin D Holmes; Janusz Rajkowski; Gary Aston-Jones; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2002 Jun-Jul

Review 2.  Adaptive gain and the role of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system in optimal performance.

Authors:  Gary Aston-Jones; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Michael J Van Wert; Naomi M Kenner; Skyler S Place; Nour Kibbi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

4.  The attention cascade model and attentional blink.

Authors:  Shui-I Shih
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Pupil dilation deconvolution reveals the dynamics of attention at high temporal resolution.

Authors:  Stefan M Wierda; Hedderik van Rijn; Niels A Taatgen; Sander Martens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: evidence from speeded and unspeeded task1 decisions.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-09

7.  Locus coeruleus neurons in monkey are selectively activated by attended cues in a vigilance task.

Authors:  G Aston-Jones; J Rajkowski; P Kubiak; T Alexinsky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Relationships between Pupil Diameter and Neuronal Activity in the Locus Coeruleus, Colliculi, and Cingulate Cortex.

Authors:  Siddhartha Joshi; Yin Li; Rishi M Kalwani; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  The locus coeruleus-noradrenergic system: modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes.

Authors:  Craig W Berridge; Barry D Waterhouse
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2003-04

10.  Pupil dilation: a fingerprint of temporal selection during the "attentional blink".

Authors:  Ariel Zylberberg; Manuel Oliva; Mariano Sigman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-28
View more
  3 in total

1.  Anticipatory Baseline Pupil Diameter Is Sensitive to Differences in Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Nicolai D Ayasse; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-10

2.  Categorical similarity modulates temporal integration in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Liqin Zhou; Jiahui Ding; Ke Zhou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Early Auditory Event Related Potentials Distinguish Higher-Order From First-Order Aversive Conditioning.

Authors:  Prateek Dhamija; Allison Wong; Asaf Gilboa
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.558

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.