Literature DB >> 19964484

Effect of anatomical variability on neural stimulation strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and magnetic seizure therapy (MST).

Zhi-De Deng1, Sarah H Lisanby, Angel V Peterchev.   

Abstract

We present a quantitative comparison of two metrics-neural stimulation strength and focality-in electrocon-vulsive therapy (ECT) and magnetic seizure therapy (MST) using finite-element method (FEM) simulation in a spherical head model. Five stimulation modalities were modeled, including bilateral ECT, unilateral ECT, focal electrically administered seizure therapy (FEAST), and MST with circular and double-cone coils, with stimulation parameters identical to those applied in clinical practice. We further examine the effect on the stimulation metrics of individual-, sex- and age-related variability in tissue layer thickness and conductivity. Neural stimulation by MST is shown to be more focal and superficial than ECT. This result suggests that it may be advantageous to reduce the current used in ECT. The stimulation strength in MST is also less sensitive to variations in head geometry and tissue conductivity than in ECT. Individualization of pulse amplitude in both ECT and MST could compensate for anatomical variability, which could lead to more consistent clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19964484     DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5334091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  18 in total

Review 1.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Self-specific processing in the default network: a single-pulse TMS study.

Authors:  Hans C Lou; Bruce Luber; Arielle Stanford; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Treating resistant depression with 2 forms of convulsive therapy: a clinical case study

Authors:  Anastasios A. Daskalakis; Zafiris J. Daskalakis
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 6.186

4.  Disruption of component processes of spatial working memory by electroconvulsive shock but not magnetic seizure therapy.

Authors:  Shawn M McClintock; Nick K DeWind; Mustafa M Husain; Stefan B Rowny; Timothy J Spellman; Herbert Terrace; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 5.176

5.  Regional electric field induced by electroconvulsive therapy in a realistic finite element head model: influence of white matter anisotropic conductivity.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Zhi-De Deng; Tae-Seong Kim; Andrew F Laine; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A systematic review of the neurocognitive effects of magnetic seizure therapy.

Authors:  Shawn M McClintock; Owais Tirmizi; Matthieu Chansard; Mustafa M Husain
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2011-10

7.  Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Electroconvulsive therapy stimulus parameters: rethinking dosage.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Moacyr A Rosa; Zhi-De Deng; Joan Prudic; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.635

9.  Clinician accessible tools for GUI computational models of transcranial electrical stimulation: BONSAI and SPHERES.

Authors:  Dennis Q Truong; Mathias Hüber; Xihe Xie; Abhishek Datta; Asif Rahman; Lucas C Parra; Jacek P Dmochowski; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Controlling stimulation strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy via current amplitude and electrode size and spacing: comparison with magnetic seizure therapy.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.