Literature DB >> 19962441

Group specific optimisation of fMRI processing steps for child and adult data.

J W Evans1, R M Todd, M J Taylor, S C Strother.   

Abstract

Motion is a major issue in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) dataseries and causes artifacts or increased overall noise obscuring signals of interest. It is particularly important to be able to control for and correct these artifacts when dealing with child data. We analysed the data from 35 children (4-8 years old) and 13 adults (18-30 years old) during an emotional face paradigm. The children were split into low and high motion groups on the basis of having less or more than an estimated maximal movement of one voxel (3.75 mm) and one degree of rotation in any motion direction between any pair of scans in the run. Several different preprocessing steps were evaluated for their ability to correct for the excess motion using agnostic canonical variates analysis (aCVA) in the NPAIRS (Nonparametric, Prediction, Activation, Influence, Reproducibility, re-Sampling) framework. The adult dataset was reasonably stable whereas the motion-prone child datasets benefited greatly from motion parameter regression (MPR). Motion parameter regression had a strong beneficial impact on all datasets, a result that was largely unaffected by other preprocessing choices; however, motion correction on its own did not have as much impact. The low motion child group subjected to MPR had reproducibility values at par with those of the adult group, but needed almost twice as many subjects to achieve this result, indicating weaker responses in young children. The aCVA showed greater sensitivity to the task response pattern than the mixed effects general linear model (mGLM) in the expected face processing regions, although the mGLM showed more responses in some other areas. This work illustrates that preprocessing choices must be made in a group-specific fashion to optimise fMRI results. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19962441     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  12 in total

1.  Right hemispheric participation in semantic decision improves performance.

Authors:  Kiely M Donnelly; Jane B Allendorfer; Jerzy P Szaflarski
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Optimizing preprocessing and analysis pipelines for single-subject fMRI. I. Standard temporal motion and physiological noise correction methods.

Authors:  Nathan W Churchill; Anita Oder; Hervé Abdi; Fred Tam; Wayne Lee; Christopher Thomas; Jon E Ween; Simon J Graham; Stephen C Strother
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  A comparison of denoising pipelines in high temporal resolution task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  Andrew R Mayer; Josef M Ling; Andrew B Dodd; Nicholas A Shaff; Christopher J Wertz; Faith M Hanlon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Data-driven optimization and evaluation of 2D EPI and 3D PRESTO for BOLD fMRI at 7 Tesla: I. Focal coverage.

Authors:  Robert L Barry; Stephen C Strother; J Christopher Gatenby; John C Gore
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Complex and magnitude-only preprocessing of 2D and 3D BOLD fMRI data at 7 T.

Authors:  Robert L Barry; Stephen C Strother; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  The Associative Memory Deficit in Aging Is Related to Reduced Selectivity of Brain Activity during Encoding.

Authors:  Cristina Saverino; Zainab Fatima; Saman Sarraf; Anita Oder; Stephen C Strother; Cheryl L Grady
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Topiramate and its effect on fMRI of language in patients with right or left temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Jerzy P Szaflarski; Jane B Allendorfer
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.937

Review 8.  Methodological approaches in developmental neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Beatriz Luna; Katerina Velanova; Charles F Geier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging movers and shakers: does subject-movement cause sampling bias?

Authors:  Glenn R Wylie; Helen Genova; John DeLuca; Nancy Chiaravalloti; James F Sumowski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Recovered vs. not-recovered from post-stroke aphasia: the contributions from the dominant and non-dominant hemispheres.

Authors:  Jerzy P Szaflarski; Jane B Allendorfer; Christi Banks; Jennifer Vannest; Scott K Holland
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.