PURPOSE: Several adult studies have documented the importance of the peri-stroke areas to aphasia recovery. But, studies examining the differences in patterns of cortical participation in language comprehension in patients who have (LMCA-R) or have not recovered (LMCA-NR) from left middle cerebral artery infarction have not been performed up to date. METHODS: In this study, we compare cortical correlates of language comprehension using fMRI and semantic decision/tone decision task in 9 LMCA-R and 18 LMCA-NR patients matched at the time of stroke for age and handedness. We examine the cortical correlates of language performance by correlating intra- and extra-scanner measures of linguistic performance with fMRI activation and stroke volumes. RESULTS: Our analyses show that LMCA-R at least 1 year after stroke show a return to typical fMRI language activation patterns and that there is a compensatory reorganization of language function in LMCA-NR patients with shifts to the right hemispheric brain regions. Further, with increasing strength of the left-hemispheric fMRI signal shift there are associated improvements in performance as tested with standardized linguistic measures. A negative correlation between the size of the stroke and performance on some of the linguistic tests is also observed. CONCLUSIONS: This right-hemispheric shift as a mechanism of post-stroke recovery in adults appears to be an ineffective mode of language function recovery with increasing right-hemispheric shift associated with lower language performance. Thus, normalization of the post-stroke language activation patterns is needed for better language performance while shifts of the activation patterns to the non-dominant (right) hemisphere and/or large stroke size are associated with decreased linguistic abilities after stroke.
PURPOSE: Several adult studies have documented the importance of the peri-stroke areas to aphasia recovery. But, studies examining the differences in patterns of cortical participation in language comprehension in patients who have (LMCA-R) or have not recovered (LMCA-NR) from left middle cerebral artery infarction have not been performed up to date. METHODS: In this study, we compare cortical correlates of language comprehension using fMRI and semantic decision/tone decision task in 9 LMCA-R and 18 LMCA-NR patients matched at the time of stroke for age and handedness. We examine the cortical correlates of language performance by correlating intra- and extra-scanner measures of linguistic performance with fMRI activation and stroke volumes. RESULTS: Our analyses show that LMCA-R at least 1 year after stroke show a return to typical fMRI language activation patterns and that there is a compensatory reorganization of language function in LMCA-NR patients with shifts to the right hemispheric brain regions. Further, with increasing strength of the left-hemispheric fMRI signal shift there are associated improvements in performance as tested with standardized linguistic measures. A negative correlation between the size of the stroke and performance on some of the linguistic tests is also observed. CONCLUSIONS: This right-hemispheric shift as a mechanism of post-stroke recovery in adults appears to be an ineffective mode of language function recovery with increasing right-hemispheric shift associated with lower language performance. Thus, normalization of the post-stroke language activation patterns is needed for better language performance while shifts of the activation patterns to the non-dominant (right) hemisphere and/or large stroke size are associated with decreased linguistic abilities after stroke.
Authors: James C Eliassen; Erin L Boespflug; Martine Lamy; Jane Allendorfer; Wen-Jang Chu; Jerzy P Szaflarski Journal: Top Stroke Rehabil Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.119
Authors: M Knoflach; B Matosevic; M Rücker; M Furtner; A Mair; G Wille; A Zangerle; P Werner; J Ferrari; C Schmidauer; L Seyfang; S Kiechl; J Willeit Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-01-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Joshua I Breier; Lynn M Maher; Stephanie Schmadeke; Khader M Hasan; Andrew C Papanicolaou Journal: Neurocase Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 0.881
Authors: Shihui Xing; Elizabeth H Lacey; Laura M Skipper-Kallal; Xiong Jiang; Michelle L Harris-Love; Jinsheng Zeng; Peter E Turkeltaub Journal: Brain Date: 2015-10-31 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: J P Szaflarski; J B Allendorfer; A W Byars; J Vannest; A Dietz; K A Hernando; S K Holland Journal: Restor Neurol Neurosci Date: 2014 Impact factor: 2.406
Authors: Joseph C Griffis; Rodolphe Nenert; Jane B Allendorfer; Jennifer Vannest; Scott Holland; Aimee Dietz; Jerzy P Szaflarski Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Denise Y Harvey; Jamie Podell; Peter E Turkeltaub; Olufunsho Faseyitan; H Branch Coslett; Roy H Hamilton Journal: Cogn Behav Neurol Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 1.600
Authors: Peter E Turkeltaub; Mary K Swears; Anila M D'Mello; Catherine J Stoodley Journal: Restor Neurol Neurosci Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 2.406