Literature DB >> 19962387

Which coordinate system for modelling path integration?

Robert J Vickerstaff1, Allen Cheung.   

Abstract

Path integration is a navigation strategy widely observed in nature where an animal maintains a running estimate, called the home vector, of its location during an excursion. Evidence suggests it is both ancient and ubiquitous in nature, and has been studied for over a century. In that time, canonical and neural network models have flourished, based on a wide range of assumptions, justifications and supporting data. Despite the importance of the phenomenon, consensus and unifying principles appear lacking. A fundamental issue is the neural representation of space needed for biological path integration. This paper presents a scheme to classify path integration systems on the basis of the way the home vector records and updates the spatial relationship between the animal and its home location. Four extended classes of coordinate systems are used to unify and review both canonical and neural network models of path integration, from the arthropod and mammalian literature. This scheme demonstrates analytical equivalence between models which may otherwise appear unrelated, and distinguishes between models which may superficially appear similar. A thorough analysis is carried out of the equational forms of important facets of path integration including updating, steering, searching and systematic errors, using each of the four coordinate systems. The type of available directional cue, namely allothetic or idiothetic, is also considered. It is shown that on balance, the class of home vectors which includes the geocentric Cartesian coordinate system, appears to be the most robust for biological systems. A key conclusion is that deducing computational structure from behavioural data alone will be difficult or impossible, at least in the absence of an analysis of random errors. Consequently it is likely that further theoretical insights into path integration will require an in-depth study of the effect of noise on the four classes of home vectors. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19962387     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  19 in total

1.  Optimal cue integration in ants.

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Michael Mangan; Barbara Webb
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Path integration, views, search, and matched filters: the contributions of Rüdiger Wehner to the study of orientation and navigation.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Cody A Freas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  The Cataglyphis Mahrèsienne: 50 years of Cataglyphis research at Mahrès.

Authors:  Rüdiger Wehner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Egocentric and geocentric navigation during extremely long foraging paths of desert ants.

Authors:  Roman Huber; Markus Knaden
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  Early ant trajectories: spatial behaviour before behaviourism.

Authors:  Rüdiger Wehner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Optimal multiguidance integration in insect navigation.

Authors:  Thierry Hoinville; Rüdiger Wehner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Principles of Insect Path Integration.

Authors:  Stanley Heinze; Ajay Narendra; Allen Cheung
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  An Anatomically Constrained Model for Path Integration in the Bee Brain.

Authors:  Thomas Stone; Barbara Webb; Andrea Adden; Nicolai Ben Weddig; Anna Honkanen; Rachel Templin; William Wcislo; Luca Scimeca; Eric Warrant; Stanley Heinze
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Grid-cell representations in mental simulation.

Authors:  Jacob Ls Bellmund; Lorena Deuker; Tobias Navarro Schröder; Christian F Doeller
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Ant navigation: fractional use of the home vector.

Authors:  Allen Cheung; Lex Hiby; Ajay Narendra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.