Literature DB >> 29483254

Optimal multiguidance integration in insect navigation.

Thierry Hoinville1,2, Rüdiger Wehner3.   

Abstract

In the last decades, desert ants have become model organisms for the study of insect navigation. In finding their way, they use two major navigational routines: path integration using a celestial compass and landmark guidance based on sets of panoramic views of the terrestrial environment. It has been claimed that this information would enable the insect to acquire and use a centralized cognitive map of its foraging terrain. Here, we present a decentralized architecture, in which the concurrently operating path integration and landmark guidance routines contribute optimally to the directions to be steered, with "optimal" meaning maximizing the certainty (reliability) of the combined information. At any one time during its journey, the animal computes a path integration (global) vector and landmark guidance (local) vector, in which the length of each vector is proportional to the certainty of the individual estimates. Hence, these vectors represent the limited knowledge that the navigator has at any one place about the direction of the goal. The sum of the global and local vectors indicates the navigator's optimal directional estimate. Wherever applied, this decentralized model architecture is sufficient to simulate the results of quite a number of diverse cue-conflict experiments, which have recently been performed in various behavioral contexts by different authors in both desert ants and honeybees. They include even those experiments that have deliberately been designed by former authors to strengthen the evidence for a metric cognitive map in bees.

Entities:  

Keywords:  compass; cue-conflict; multisensory; path integration; vector field

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29483254      PMCID: PMC5856556          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1721668115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  35 in total

1.  How do insects use path integration for their navigation?

Authors:  M Collett; T S Collett
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Catchment areas of panoramic snapshots in outdoor scenes.

Authors:  Jochen Zeil; Martin I Hofmann; Javaan S Chahl
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Cue combination on the circle and the sphere.

Authors:  Richard F Murray; Yaniv Morgenstern
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  The Sensory Ecology of Ant Navigation: From Natural Environments to Neural Mechanisms.

Authors:  Markus Knaden; Paul Graham
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 19.686

5.  The significance of direct sunlight and polarized skylight in the ant's celestial system of navigation.

Authors:  Rüdiger Wehner; Martin Müller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Depth, contrast and view-based homing in outdoor scenes.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stürzl; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Which coordinate system for modelling path integration?

Authors:  Robert J Vickerstaff; Allen Cheung
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Three-dimensional models of natural environments and the mapping of navigational information.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stürzl; Iris Grixa; Elmar Mair; Ajay Narendra; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  An Anatomically Constrained Model for Path Integration in the Bee Brain.

Authors:  Thomas Stone; Barbara Webb; Andrea Adden; Nicolai Ben Weddig; Anna Honkanen; Rachel Templin; William Wcislo; Luca Scimeca; Eric Warrant; Stanley Heinze
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Wind and sky as compass cues in desert ant navigation.

Authors:  Martin Müller; Rüdiger Wehner
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-03-15
View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  The Cataglyphis Mahrèsienne: 50 years of Cataglyphis research at Mahrès.

Authors:  Rüdiger Wehner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Pheromone cue triggers switch between vectors in the desert harvest ant, Veromessor pergandei.

Authors:  Cody A Freas; Jenna V Congdon; Nicola J R Plowes; Marcia L Spetch
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Multi-modal cue integration in the black garden ant.

Authors:  Massimo De Agrò; Felix Benjamin Oberhauser; Maria Loconsole; Gabriella Galli; Federica Dal Cin; Enzo Moretto; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  A connectome of the Drosophila central complex reveals network motifs suitable for flexible navigation and context-dependent action selection.

Authors:  Brad K Hulse; Hannah Haberkern; Romain Franconville; Daniel Turner-Evans; Shin-Ya Takemura; Tanya Wolff; Marcella Noorman; Marisa Dreher; Chuntao Dan; Ruchi Parekh; Ann M Hermundstad; Gerald M Rubin; Vivek Jayaraman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  Decentralized control of insect walking: A simple neural network explains a wide range of behavioral and neurophysiological results.

Authors:  Malte Schilling; Holk Cruse
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  A decentralised neural model explaining optimal integration of navigational strategies in insects.

Authors:  Xuelong Sun; Shigang Yue; Michael Mangan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  The Role of Landscapes and Landmarks in Bee Navigation: A Review.

Authors:  Bahram Kheradmand; James C Nieh
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 2.769

8.  Two distance memories in desert ants-Modes of interaction.

Authors:  Harald Wolf; Matthias Wittlinger; Sarah E Pfeffer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Examples of Gibsonian Affordances in Legged Robotics Research Using an Empirical, Generative Framework.

Authors:  Sonia F Roberts; Daniel E Koditschek; Lisa J Miracchi
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 10.  Arthropod spatial cognition.

Authors:  Sarah Pfeffer; Harald Wolf
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.