Literature DB >> 30205054

Principles of Insect Path Integration.

Stanley Heinze1, Ajay Narendra2, Allen Cheung3.   

Abstract

Continuously monitoring its position in space relative to a goal is one of the most essential tasks for an animal that moves through its environment. Species as diverse as rats, bees, and crabs achieve this by integrating all changes of direction with the distance covered during their foraging trips, a process called path integration. They generate an estimate of their current position relative to a starting point, enabling a straight-line return, following what is known as a home vector. While in theory path integration always leads the animal precisely back home, in the real world noise limits the usefulness of this strategy when operating in isolation. Noise results from stochastic processes in the nervous system and from unreliable sensory information, particularly when obtaining heading estimates. Path integration, during which angular self-motion provides the sole input for encoding heading (idiothetic path integration), results in accumulating errors that render this strategy useless over long distances. In contrast, when using an external compass this limitation is avoided (allothetic path integration). Many navigating insects indeed rely on external compass cues for estimating body orientation, whereas they obtain distance information by integration of steps or optic-flow-based speed signals. In the insect brain, a region called the central complex plays a key role for path integration. Not only does the central complex house a ring-attractor network that encodes head directions, neurons responding to optic flow also converge with this circuit. A neural substrate for integrating direction and distance into a memorized home vector has therefore been proposed in the central complex. We discuss how behavioral data and the theoretical framework of path integration can be aligned with these neural data.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30205054      PMCID: PMC6462409          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  96 in total

1.  How do insects use path integration for their navigation?

Authors:  M Collett; T S Collett
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Information flow through neural circuits for pheromone orientation.

Authors:  Shigehiro Namiki; Satoshi Iwabuchi; Poonsup Pansopha Kono; Ryohei Kanzaki
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Vector navigation in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis: celestial compass cues are essential for the proper use of distance information.

Authors:  Stefan Sommer; Rüdiger Wehner
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-10-28

4.  The ant odometer: stepping on stilts and stumps.

Authors:  Matthias Wittlinger; Rüdiger Wehner; Harald Wolf
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A comprehensive wiring diagram of the protocerebral bridge for visual information processing in the Drosophila brain.

Authors:  Chih-Yung Lin; Chao-Chun Chuang; Tzu-En Hua; Chun-Chao Chen; Barry J Dickson; Ralph J Greenspan; Ann-Shyn Chiang
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 6.  The neurobiological basis of orientation in insects: insights from the silkmoth mating dance.

Authors:  Shigehiro Namiki; Ryohei Kanzaki
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 5.186

7.  Species-specific differences in the fine structure of learning walk elements in Cataglyphis ants.

Authors:  Pauline N Fleischmann; Robin Grob; Rüdiger Wehner; Wolfgang Rössler
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Experience-related reorganization of giant synapses in the lateral complex: Potential role in plasticity of the sky-compass pathway in the desert ant Cataglyphis fortis.

Authors:  Franziska Schmitt; Sara Mae Stieb; Rüdiger Wehner; Wolfgang Rössler
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.964

9.  Displaced honey bees perform optimal scale-free search flights.

Authors:  Andrew M Reynolds; Alan D Smith; Randolf Menzel; Uwe Greggers; Donald R Reynolds; Joseph R Riley
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Recurrent Circuitry for Balancing Sleep Need and Sleep.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Donlea; Diogo Pimentel; Clifford B Talbot; Anissa Kempf; Jaison J Omoto; Volker Hartenstein; Gero Miesenböck
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  The Cataglyphis Mahrèsienne: 50 years of Cataglyphis research at Mahrès.

Authors:  Rüdiger Wehner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Polarized skylight-based heading measurements: a bio-inspired approach.

Authors:  Julien Dupeyroux; Stéphane Viollet; Julien R Serres
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Origin and role of path integration in the cognitive representations of the hippocampus: computational insights into open questions.

Authors:  Francesco Savelli; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  Learning in Cnidaria: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ken Cheng
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 5.  Navigation and orientation in Coleoptera: a review of strategies and mechanisms.

Authors:  Elizabeth de Jongh
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Effect of large visual changes on the navigation of the nocturnal bull ant, Myrmecia midas.

Authors:  Muzahid Islam; Cody A Freas; Ken Cheng
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 7.  Homing in the arachnid taxa Araneae and Amblypygi.

Authors:  Joaquín Ortega-Escobar
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 8.  Jumping spiders: An exceptional group for comparative cognition studies.

Authors:  Samuel Aguilar-Arguello; Ximena J Nelson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Drosophila re-zero their path integrator at the center of a fictive food patch.

Authors:  Amir H Behbahani; Emily H Palmer; Román A Corfas; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Diverse Food-Sensing Neurons Trigger Idiothetic Local Search in Drosophila.

Authors:  Román A Corfas; Tarun Sharma; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.