BACKGROUND: Although cigarette smoking has been associated with increased human papilloma virus (HPV) detection, its impact on HPV DNA load is unknown. METHODS: The study subjects were women who were positive for HPV16 and/or HPV18 at enrollment into the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance-Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study. Assessments of exposure to smoke and sexual behavior were based on self-report. Viral genome copies per nanogram of cellular DNA were measured by multiplex real-time PCR. Linear or logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between cigarette smoking and baseline viral load. RESULTS: Of the 1,050 women (752 with HPV16, 258 with HPV18, and 40 with both HPV16 and HPV18), 452 (43.0%) were current smokers and 101 (9.6%) were former smokers at enrollment. The baseline viral load was statistically significantly greater for current compared with never smokers (P = 0.03 for HPV16; P = 0.02 for HPV18) but not for former smokers. Among current smokers, neither HPV16 nor HPV18 DNA load seemed to vary appreciably by age at smoking initiation, smoking intensity, or smoking duration. The results remained similar when the analysis of smoking-related HPV16 DNA load was restricted to women without detectable cervical abnormality. CONCLUSION: Higher baseline HPV16 and HPV18 DNA load was associated with status as a current but not former smoker. A lack of dose-response relationship between cigarette smoking and viral load may indicate a low threshold for the effect of smoking on HPV DNA load.
BACKGROUND: Although cigarette smoking has been associated with increased human papilloma virus (HPV) detection, its impact on HPV DNA load is unknown. METHODS: The study subjects were women who were positive for HPV16 and/or HPV18 at enrollment into the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance-Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study. Assessments of exposure to smoke and sexual behavior were based on self-report. Viral genome copies per nanogram of cellular DNA were measured by multiplex real-time PCR. Linear or logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between cigarette smoking and baseline viral load. RESULTS: Of the 1,050 women (752 with HPV16, 258 with HPV18, and 40 with both HPV16 and HPV18), 452 (43.0%) were current smokers and 101 (9.6%) were former smokers at enrollment. The baseline viral load was statistically significantly greater for current compared with never smokers (P = 0.03 for HPV16; P = 0.02 for HPV18) but not for former smokers. Among current smokers, neither HPV16 nor HPV18 DNA load seemed to vary appreciably by age at smoking initiation, smoking intensity, or smoking duration. The results remained similar when the analysis of smoking-related HPV16 DNA load was restricted to women without detectable cervical abnormality. CONCLUSION: Higher baseline HPV16 and HPV18 DNA load was associated with status as a current but not former smoker. A lack of dose-response relationship between cigarette smoking and viral load may indicate a low threshold for the effect of smoking on HPV DNA load.
Authors: P E Gravitt; C L Peyton; T Q Alessi; C M Wheeler; F Coutlée; A Hildesheim; M H Schiffman; D R Scott; R J Apple Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Jill Koshiol; Jane Schroeder; Denise J Jamieson; Stephen W Marshall; Ann Duerr; Charles M Heilig; Keerti V Shah; Robert S Klein; Susan Cu-Uvin; Paula Schuman; David Celentano; Jennifer S Smith Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2006-06-14 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Anthony S Gunnell; Trung N Tran; Anna Torrång; Paul W Dickman; Pär Sparén; Juni Palmgren; Nathalie Ylitalo Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2006-10-20 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Aline Simen-Kapeu; Vesa Kataja; Merja Yliskoski; Kari Syrjänen; Joakim Dillner; Pentti Koskela; Jorma Paavonen; Matti Lehtinen Journal: Scand J Infect Dis Date: 2008
Authors: Salvatore Vaccarella; Rolando Herrero; Peter J F Snijders; Min Dai; Jaiye O Thomas; Nguyen Trong Hieu; Catterina Ferreccio; Elena Matos; Hector Posso; Silvia de Sanjosé; Hai Rim Shin; Sukhon Sukvirach; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Nubia Muñoz; Chris J L M Meijer; Silvia Franceschi Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2008-03-03 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Kari Syrjänen; Irena Shabalova; Nicolay Petrovichev; Vladimir Kozachenko; Tatjana Zakharova; Julia Pajanidi; Jurij Podistov; Galina Chemeris; Larisa Sozaeva; Elena Lipova; Irena Tsidaeva; Olga Ivanchenko; Alla Pshepurko; Sergej Zakharenko; Raisa Nerovjna; Ludmila Kljukina; Oksana Erokhina; Marina Branovskaja; Maritta Nikitina; Valerija Grunberga; Alexandr Grunberg; Anna Juschenko; Rosa Santopietro; Marcella Cintorino; Piero Tosi; Stina Syrjänen Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2007-09-08 Impact factor: 12.434
Authors: Matthew B Schabath; Luisa L Villa; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Jorge Salmerón; Manuel Quiterio; Anna R Giuliano Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Tsung-chieh Jane Fu; Long Fu Xi; Ayaka Hulbert; James P Hughes; Qinghua Feng; Stephen M Schwartz; Stephen E Hawes; Laura A Koutsky; Rachel L Winer Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Samina Alam; Brian S Bowser; Michael J Conway; Mohd Israr; Eric J Ryndock; Long Fu Xi; Craig Meyers Journal: J Virol Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Anil K Chaturvedi; Hormuzd A Katki; Allan Hildesheim; Ana Cecilia Rodríguez; Wim Quint; Mark Schiffman; Leen-Jan Van Doorn; Carolina Porras; Sholom Wacholder; Paula Gonzalez; Mark E Sherman; Rolando Herrero Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Frederico O Gleber-Netto; Mei Zhao; Sanchit Trivedi; Jiping Wang; Samar Jasser; Christina McDowell; Humam Kadara; Jiexin Zhang; Jing Wang; William N William; J Jack Lee; Minh Ly Nguyen; Sara I Pai; Heather M Walline; Dong M Shin; Robert L Ferris; Thomas E Carey; Jeffrey N Myers; Curtis R Pickering Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-10-20 Impact factor: 6.860