| Literature DB >> 19956696 |
Melanie Norgate1, Jay Chamings, Alexandra Pavlova, James K Bull, Neil D Murray, Paul Sunnucks.
Abstract
Knowledge of historical changes in species range distribution provides context for investigating adaptive potential and dispersal ability. This is valuable for predicting the potential impact of environmental change on species of interest. Butterflies are one of the most important taxa for studying such impacts, and Heteronympha merope has the potential to provide a particularly valuable model, in part due to the existence of historical data on morphological traits and glycolytic enzyme variation. This study investigates the population genetic structure and phylogeography of H. merope, comparing the relative resolution achieved through partial DNA sequences of two mitochondrial loci, COI and ND5. These data are used to define the relationship between subspecies, showing that the subspecies are reciprocally monophyletic. On this basis, the Western Australian subspecies H. m. duboulayi is genetically distinct from the two eastern subspecies. Throughout the eastern part of the range, levels of migration and the timing of key population splits of potential relevance to climatic adaptation are estimated and indicate Late Pleistocene divergence both of the Tasmanian subspecies and of an isolated northern population from the eastern mainland subspecies H. m. merope. This information is then used to revisit historical data and provides support for the importance of clinal variation in wing characters, as well as evidence for selective pressure acting on allozyme loci phosphoglucose isomerase and phosphoglucomutase in H. merope. The study has thus confirmed the value of H. merope as a model organism for measuring responses to environmental change, offering the opportunity to focus on isolated populations, as well as a latitudinal gradient, and to use historical changes to test the accuracy of predictions for the future.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19956696 PMCID: PMC2776993 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007950
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Heteronympha merope distribution and collection site locations.
The ranges of the three subspecies are marked as shown in the key with ranges adapted from Braby [8] and Pearse [7] to show the geographic isolation of WP and CG. Sites are labelled according to abbreviated location names for H. merope and species names for outgroups. In the text, “eastern” refers to H. m. merope and H. m. salazar and “South Australian” refers to the State of South Australia which includes WP, MR, ST, and WB. Further details for all sites, including full location and species names, are provided in Table 1.
Collection locations and numbers for butterfly specimens used in this study.
| Collection Site | Latitude | Longitude | COI | ND5 | Both loci | |
| CG | Carnavon Gorge | 25° 3′ 35.41″ | 148° 14′ 1.71″ | 15 | 19 | 15 |
| CO | Coonabarabran | 31° 15′ 15.99″ | 149° 17′ 4.78″ | - | 17 | - |
| FI | Flinders Island | 39°53′34.36″ | 148° 3′ 6.33″ | - | 17 | - |
| KI | Kangaroo Island | 35° 47′ 19.87″ | 137° 12′ 0.04″ | - | 30 | - |
| MR | Mt Remarkable | 32° 55′ 28.39″ | 138° 5′ 33.54″ | - | 26 | - |
| MY | Myrtleford | 36° 33′ 48.73″ | 146° 44′ 26.39″ | 10 | 22 | 10 |
| SI | Shallow Inlet | 38° 51′ 0.45″ | 146° 11′ 17.64″ | 26 | 28 | 24 |
| ST | Stirling | 35° 1′ 3.56″ | 138° 42′ 42.17″ | 22 | 23 | 18 |
| TO | Toowoomba | 27° 34′ 52.80″ | 151° 59′ 19.40″ | 16 | 23 | 14 |
| VI | Vittoria | 33° 25′ 34.96″ | 149° 18′ 50.76″ | 10 | 9 | 9 |
| WJ | Wee Jasper | 35° 6′ 54.00″ | 148° 40′ 4.80″ | - | 10 | - |
| WP | Wilpena Pound | 31° 29′ 39.00″ | 138° 38′ 40.00″ | 27 | 43 | 27 |
| WB | Wrights Bay | 37° 1′ 40.43″ | 139° 47′ 58.52″ | 9 | 21 | 8 |
| BL ( | Black River | 40° 50′ 59.70″ | 145° 18′ 32.23″ | - | 19 | - |
| HB ( | Hobart | 42° 55′ 51.46″ | 147° 21′ 24.08″ | 11 | 24 | 9 |
| LA ( | Launceston | 41° 27′ 17.37 | 147° 10′ 0.59″ | 10 | 40 | - |
| SP ( | St Peter's Pass | 42° 16′ 9.00″ | 147° 24′ 21.00″ | 10 | 11 | 10 |
| WA ( | Albany, WA | 35° 6′ 6.96″ | 117° 54′ 18.98″ | 4 | 5 | 4 |
|
| Armidale, NSW | 30° 34′ 52.24″ | 151° 44′ 35.39″ | 2 | 5 | 2 |
|
| Daylesford, Vic | 37° 20′ 38.25″ | 144° 12′ 23.56″ | - | 1 | - |
|
| Horsham, Vic | 36° 43′ 16.58″ | 142° 20′ 19.92″ | - | 1 | - |
Collections are H. m. merope unless otherwise marked. All specimens except FI were collected between November 2007 and January 2008. FI specimens were collected in 1988. For H. merope 108 females and 58 males were screened COI, and 253 females and 134 males were screened for ND5.
Genetic distances between outgroup haplotypes and most common H. m. merope/salazar haplotype.
| COI | ND5 | |||
| Species | Haplotype | Difference from COI H1 (bp) | Haplotype | Difference from ND5 H1 (bp) |
|
| H1-H31 (n = 166) | 0.395 | H1-H13 (n = 382) | 2.84 |
|
| WA1 (n = 4 ) | 25 (5.8%) | WA (n = 4) | 21 (5.3%) |
| - | - | WA2 (n = 1) | 20 (5.1%) | |
|
| Hpenelope1 (n = 1 ) | 34 (7.8%) | Hpenelope1 (n = 3 ) | 28 (7.1%) |
| Hpenelope2 (n = 1 ) | 35 (8.1%) | Hpenelope2 (n = 2 ) | 28 (7.1%) | |
|
| - | - | Jvillida (n = 1) | 49 (12.4%) |
|
| - | - | Vkershawi (n = 1) | 50 (12.7%) |
Values for H1-H31 are average difference between any two H. m. merope or H. m. salazar haplotypes, including H1; all other values are the difference from H1, which is the most common haplotype and shared by H. m. merope and H. m. salazar. n = number of specimens from Table 1 with a given haplotype. The percentage divergence is shown in brackets for each.
Comparison of 435bp region of COI and 395bp region of ND5.
| N | L | M | k | Vs k | k/L | k/N | π | SD of π | π/L | |
| COI (mtD6) | 166 | 435 | 11 | 0.395 | 0.002 | 0.0009 | 0.0024 | 0.00091 | 0.00014 | 2.09×10−06 |
| ND5 (V1) | 198 | 395 | 18 | 1.138 | 0.006 | 0.0029 | 0.0057 | 0.00288 | 0.00023 | 7.29×10−06 |
Statistics are based on average differences between any two randomly selected H. m. merope and H. m. salazar haplotype sequences. N, number of sequences; L, length of sequence; M, number of variable sites; k, average number of nucleotide differences; Vs k sampling variance of k; k/L k over length of sequence*; π nucleotide diversity; SD π standard deviation of π.
The value of k is dependent on L and N so k/L and k/N provide values standardised by sequence length and the number of sequences, respectively [63].
The value of π is dependent on L, thus π/L may be a more accurate comparison [63].
Figure 2Relationships among haplotypes and collection sites.
(A) Distribution of ND5 haplotypes amongst collection sites. Haplotypes are labelled by colour and the frequency at each site is indicated in pie charts. H1 (bright blue) is present at all sites and H7-H8, H12-H18, H20, H22-H23, and H25-H30 (represented in three pastel colours for simplicity) are present in a single individual each. (B) Median Joining network indicating the relationship amongst ND5 haplotypes. Each pie chart represents a different haplotype, made up of collection sites in which that haplotype occurs (sites labelled by colour). Haplotypes connected by a line differ in sequence by one base pair. The size of each pie chart indicates the relative frequency of the haplotype within the entire sample. The size of the collection site slices is influenced by both the frequency of the haplotype across the sites and the sample size for each site. As sample sizes are not equal (Table 1), slices may be interpreted as indication of presence of a haplotype at a site rather than frequency. The network shown is estimated as being connected to outgroups H. m. duboulayi (WA1 and WA2) and H. penelope (Hpen1 and Hpen2) via inferred common ancestors of H12, H21, and H31 (open circles).
Molecular variance in H. m. merope and H. m. salazar.
|
| ||||
| Within sites (%) | Among sites (%) | FST/ΦST | P-value | |
|
| 86.74 | 13.26 | 0.13264 | <0.0001 |
| ΦST | 85.28 | 14.72 | 0.14717 | <0.0001 |
Flinders Island has been excluded from this analysis as relationship to the Tasmanian locations is unclear. A separate AMOVA performed with Flinders Island included verified that the overall F ST/ΦST would not be significantly affected. Groups used separately are (1) all mainland sites including Kangaroo Island, and (2) all Tasmanian sites. Within site variation is not identical between the two analyses despite the statistic being the same, as some of this variation is now explained by the differences between groups.
T, total population; S, sub-populations (locations); C, clusters of sub-populations (groups).
Figure 3Pairwise F ST and ΦST values between each pair of collection sites.
Significant values are indicated by shading (P<0.05). Negative values are equivalent to zero, indicating no differentiation between samples.
Results of three IMa analyses.
| Model | θ1 | θ2 | θA | Ne(1), number of individuals | Ne(2), number of individuals | Ne(A), number of individuals |
|
|
| t, years | |
| COI, Mainland (1) vs. Tasmania (2) | Multidimensional peak location | 12.125 | n/e | 0.006 | 605,887 | n/e | 300 | 0.585 | n/e | 0.535 | 82,258 |
| Marginal peak location | 7.762 | n/e | 0.010 | 387,918 | n/e | 483 | 2.288 | n/e | 0.194 | 29870 | |
| Lower 90% HPD | 2.297 | n/e | 0.010 | 114,804 | n/e | 483 | 0.016 | n/e | 0.037 | 5651 | |
| Upper 90% HPD | 28.026 | n/e | 13.745 | 1,400,612 | n/e | 686,891 | 24.016 | n/e | 3.498 | 537,923 | |
| ND5, Mainland (1) vs. Tasmania (2) | Multidimensional peak location | 35.630 | 29.134 | 3.009 | 1,224,247 | 1,001,045 | 103,389 | 0.0001 | 0.0003 | 0.191 | 20,193 |
| Marginal peak location | 34.087 | 19.748 | 2.983 | 1,171,238 | 678,545 | 102,504 | 0.002 | 1.677 | 0.198 | 20,880 | |
| Lower 90% HPD | 17.068 | 8.069 | 0.910 | 586,459 | 277,266 | 31,255 | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.116 | 12211 | |
| Upper 90% HPD | 67.245 | 49.444 | 8.930 | 2,310,549 | 1,698,884 | 306,841 | 1.734 | 4.960 | 0.341 | 35,999 | |
| ND5, Mainland (1) vs. Carnarvon Gorge (2) | Multidimensional peak location | 83.168 | 0.659 | 0.971 | 2,857,653 | 22,643 | 33,364 | 0.0001 | n/e | 0.198 | 20,880 |
| Marginal peak location | 50.775 | 1.310 | 2.611 | 1,744,622 | 45,009 | 89,711 | 0.005 | n/e | 0.171 | 18,026 | |
| Lower 90% HPD | 31.313 | 0.205 | 0.383 | 1,075,922 | 7,042 | 13,166 | 0.005 | n/e | 0.057 | 5,973 | |
| Upper 90% HPD | 81.963 | 7.120 | 9.954 | 2,816,258 | 244,639 | 342,005 | 5.965 | n/e | 0.408 | 43,082 |
Coalescent estimates of relative effective sizes for contemporary populations (1), (2) and their ancestral population (A), relative immigration rates m1 into population (1), and m2 into (2), and relative time of split t between (1) and (2) are derived from combined parameter distributions of four IMa runs. Absolute time (t) is calculated assuming μCOI of 6.504×10−6 or μND5 of 9.459×10−6 substitutions per year per locus, demographic estimates of Ne are calculated assuming generation time of 1 year; n/e indicates samples not estimated due to insufficient data (marginal distributions did not converge).
HPD estimates are unreliable because the tail of the distribution did not reach zero.
Tests and parameters estimated in IMa for nested models to identify the simplest model that explains the data.
| Model | Log(P) | 2LLR | df | P-value |
| t, years | θ1 | θ2 | θA |
|
|
| θ1 θ2 ΘA
| −5.64 | - | - | - | 0.535 | 82,259 | 12.1 | 19.3 | 0.006 | 0.585 | 4.499 |
| θ1 θ2 θA
| −5.99 | 0.701 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.806 | 123,925 | 10.1 | 17.1 | 0.005 | 1.088 | 1.088 |
| θ1 θ2 θA
| −5.72 | 0.165 | 1§ | 0.68 | 0.344 | 52,892 | 13.3 | 12.2 | 0.01 | 3.916 | 0 |
| θ1 = θ2 θA
| −5.85 | 0.417 | 1 | 0.52 | 0.345 | 53,045 | 13.0 | 13.0 | 0.01 | 3.9 | 0 |
| θ1 = θ2 θA
| −7.30 | 3.318 | 2 | 0.19 | 0.538 | 82,720 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 0.007 | 1.447 | 1.447 |
Models that were not rejected by LRT (P>0.05) are shown and all are for COI data: Mainland (1) versus Tasmania (2). ‘Log(P)’ is the posterior probability of the model given data, ‘2LLR’ = 2×(Log(P)nested model−Log(P)full model), ‘df’ is the difference in number of parameters between nested and full model except where marked with § (in which case models have distributions of 2LLR that are a mixture, see [36]), ‘P-value’ is the probability of achieving the test statistic (2LLR) by chance under the null model. Nested models were rejected for all ND5 analyses.