| Literature DB >> 30874632 |
Annika Mae Lamb1,2, Anders Gonçalves da Silva3, Leo Joseph4, Paul Sunnucks5, Alexandra Pavlova5.
Abstract
Understanding how environmental change has shaped species evolution can inform predictions of how future climate change might continue to do so. Research of widespread biological systems spanning multiple climates that have been subject to environmental change can yield generalizable inferences about the neutral and adaptive processes driving lineage divergence during periods of environmental change. We contribute to the growing body of multi-locus phylogeographic studies investigating the effect of Pleistocene climate change on species evolution by focusing on a widespread Australo-Papuan songbird with several mitochondrial lineages that diverged during the Pleistocene, the grey shrike-thrush (Colluricincla harmonica). We employed multi-locus phylogenetic, population genetic and coalescent analyses to (1) assess whether nuclear genetic diversity suggests a history congruent with that based on phenotypically defined subspecies ranges, mitochondrial clade boundaries and putative biogeographical barriers, (2) estimate genetic diversity within and genetic differentiation and gene flow among regional populations and (3) estimate population divergence times. The five currently recognized subspecies of grey shrike-thrush are genetically differentiated in nuclear and mitochondrial genomes, but connected by low levels of gene flow. Divergences among these populations are concordant with recognized historical biogeographical barriers and date to the Pleistocene. Discordance in the order of population divergence events based on mitochondrial and nuclear genomes suggests a history of sex-biased gene flow and/or mitochondrial introgression at secondary contacts. This study demonstrates that climate change can impact sexes with different dispersal biology in different ways. Incongruence between population and mitochondrial trees calls for a genome-wide investigation into dispersal, mitochondrial introgression and mitonuclear evolution.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30874632 PMCID: PMC6972870 DOI: 10.1038/s41437-019-0206-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heredity (Edinb) ISSN: 0018-067X Impact factor: 3.821
Fig. 1The ranges of the currently accepted grey shrike-thrush subspecies: blue—strigata, red—harmonica, purple—superciliosa, green—brunnea and yellow—rufiventris, and contemporary and putative historical biogeographic barriers and relevant geographic regions (Schodde and Mason 1999). The grey shrike-thrush mitochondrial ND2 tree topology adapted from Lamb et al. (2018) is also shown (same colours apply); here we considered the King Island and Tasmanian lineages as one because their ranges overlap
Fig. 2Individual membership to genetic clades, phylogenetic ND2 gene tree (a) and nuclear intron species tree (c) showing divergence among clades and gene flow between subspecies. Subspecies ranges are coloured as in Fig. 1. Mapped individuals in (b) are coloured by mitochondrial clade based on phylogenetic analysis of ND2 data. Pies in (d) and (f) represent genetic cluster membership probabilities identified by TESS analyses of the nuclear intron data (d) and length-variable marker data (f). Note that grey slices in the pies in (f) represent the genetic cluster shared by brunnea and superciliosa individuals. Map on (e) shows effective immigration rate estimates (in number of effective migrants per generation (confidence interval)) inferred by MIGRATE-N from the length-variable marker data. Where confidence intervals overlapped zero, effective immigration rates are shown as nonsignificant (ns)
Pairwise FST and ΦST values estimating differentiation across contemporary and putative historical biogeographical barriers between the populations of grey shrike-thrush inhabiting the regions either side of each barrier
| Regions compared | Barrier | Nuclear intron | Length-variable marker | ND2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB4 | DRD4 | GAPDH | MUSK-I4 | RI2 | TGFb2 | ||||
| East-Australia V Tasmania | Bass Strait | 0.48 ( | 0.19 (0.027) | 0.29 ( | |||||
| East-Australia V Cape York Peninsula | Torresian | 0.00 (0.387) | 0.15 (0.288) | 0.06 (0.153) | |||||
| East-Australia V north-west | Carpentarian | 0.00 (0.315) | 0.04 (0.207) | ||||||
| East-Australia V south-west/central | Eyrean | ||||||||
| Cape York Peninsula V PNG | Torres Strait | 0.14 (0.216) | 0.03 (0.126) | −0.27 (0.991) | 0.00 (0.423) | 0.05 (0.378) | 0.10 (0.091) | NA | |
| Cape York Peninsula V north-west | Carpentarian | 0.24 (0.027) | 0.18 (0.108) | −0.08 (0.991) | 0.10 (0.054) | ||||
| North-west V south-west/central | Canning | 0.09 (0.198) | −0.06 (0.68) | ||||||
Significant (P-value < 0.011) estimates are in bold. Length-variable marker data were not available for the Papua New Guinean (PNG) range of the species, so differentiation across the Torres Strait could not be estimated using this dataset (NA)
Estimates of genetic diversity for the regional populations of C. harmonica and results of tests of selection/demographic change (Tajima’s D and Fu and Li’s F statistic estimates) in ND2
| Dataset | Regional population | Tasmanian | East Australia | Cape York Peninsula | Papua New Guinea | North-west | South-west/central |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length-variable markers | 18 | 83 | 12 | – | 15 | 42 | |
| % Polymorphic loci | 35.7 | 100.0 | 100.0 | – | 78.6 | 85.7 | |
| 2.64 | 9.50 | 5.64 | – | 5.93 | 7.71 | ||
| 0.29 | 1.93 | 0.29 | – | 0.57 | 1.00 | ||
| AR | 2.93 | 5.52 | 5.64 | – | 5.61 | 5.38 | |
| He (sd) | 0.23 (0.13) | 0.57 (0.29) | 0.55 (0.29) | – | 0.53 (0.28) | 0.52 (0.27) | |
| θ | – | 4.29 | 4.90 | – | 4.29 | 4.26 | |
| ND2 | 18 | 84 | 15 | 16 | 15 | 41 | |
| S | 5 | 80 | 12 | 30 | 23 | 31 | |
| H | 6 | 37 | 9 | 6 | 12 | 25 | |
| Hd | 0.719 | 0.903 | 0.848 | 0.808 | 0.971 | 0.955 | |
| π | 0.0015 | 0.004 | 0.0028 | 0.010 | 0.0042 | 0.003 | |
| Tajima’s | 0.151 (>0.10) | −2.191 (<0.01) | −0.860 (>0.10) | 0.771 (>0.10) | −1.576 (>0.10) | −1.934 (<0.05) | |
| Fu and Li’s | −0.252 (>0.10) | −3.503 (<0.02) | −1.209 (>0.10) | 1.457 (>0.05) | −1.962 (>0.10) | −2.812 (<0.05) | |
| Nuclear introns | 6.2 (2–7) | 32.2 (29–33) | 5.7 (1–7) | 7.7 (6–8) | 6.2 (2–7) | 7.5 (6–8) | |
| S mean (min–max) | 2.7 (0–9) | 13.0 (2–29) | 6.2 (1–16) | 3.7 (0–12) | 6.3 (1–18) | 5 (0–9) | |
| H mean (min–max) | 1.8 (1–3) | 15.2 (3–32) | 4.4 (2–9) | 2.7 (1–5) | 4.7 (2–10) | 5.2 (1–9) | |
| Hd mean (min–max) | 0.263 (0–0.833) | 0.703 (0.461–0.966) | 0.559 (0.20–0.923) | 0.296 (0–0.525) | 0.621 (0.264–1) | 0.550 (0–0.9242) | |
| π mean (min–max) | 0.0026 (0–0.0123) | 0.0053 (0.0009–0.0111) | 0.0035 (0.0007–0.0095) | 0.0020 (0–0.0039) | 0.0046 (0.0009–0.0118) | 0.0031 (0–0.0101) | |
| θπ (min–max) | 0.93 (0–3.83) | 2.39 (0.48–5.45) | 1.90 (0.2–5.63) | 0.87 (0–2.32) | 2.04 (0.26–5.49) | 1.33 (0–3.14) |
The number of individuals analyzed for each dataset (N inds); percentage polymorphic loci, number of alleles per locus, number of private alleles per locus, allelic richness (AR) and heterozygosity (He) of the length-variable marker data; and the number of segregating sites (S), number of haplotypes (H), haplotype diversity (Hd) and nucleotide diversity (π) of sequence data are listed. Mutation-scaled estimates of effective population size calculated for the length-variable marker (θ) and nuclear intron (θπ) data are also listed