Literature DB >> 19956505

Single immunochemical fecal occult blood test for detection of colorectal neoplasia.

Dae Kyung Sohn1, Seung-Yong Jeong, Hyo Seong Choi, Seok-Byung Lim, Jin Myeong Huh, Dae-Hyun Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Young Hoon Kim, Hee Jin Chang, Kyung Hae Jung, Joong-Bae Ahn, Hyun Kyung Kim, Jae-Gahb Park.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate the validity of a single immunochemical fecal occult blood test (FOBT) for detection of colorectal neoplasia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 3,794 average-risk screenees and 304 colorectal cancer patients admitted to the National Cancer Center, Korea, between May 2001 and November 2002, were studied prospectively. All screenees and admitted patients underwent FOBT and total colonoscopic examinations. Stools were self-collected, and examined using an immunochemical fecal occult blood test (OC-hemodia, Eiken Chemical Co. Tokyo, Japan) and an OC-sensor analyzer(R) (Eiken Chemical Co. Tokyo, Japan).
RESULTS: Of the 3,794 asymptomatic screenees, the colonoscopy identified colorectal adenomas and cancers in 613 (16.2%) and 12 (0.3%) subjects, respectively. The sensitivities of a single immunochemical FOBT for detecting colorectal cancers and adenomas in screenees were 25.0 and 2.4%, respectively. The false positive rate of FOBT for colorectal cancer in screenees was 1.19%. For the total 316 colorectal cancer cases (including 12 cases from screenees), the FOBT sensitivities according to the T-stage were 38.5, 75.0%, 78.9 and 79.2% for T1, 2, 3 and 4 cancers, respectively. The sensitivities according to the Dukes stages A, B and C were 63.4, 79.3 and 78.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The sensitivities of a single immunochemical FOBT for detecting colorectal cancers and adenomas in screenees were 25.0 and 2.4%, respectively. The sensitivities of FOBT were about 80% for Dukes B or C colorectal cancers and 63.4% for Dukes A.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal neoplasm; Fecal occult blood test; Screening; Stage

Year:  2005        PMID: 19956505      PMCID: PMC2785417          DOI: 10.4143/crt.2005.37.1.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1598-2998            Impact factor:   4.679


  20 in total

1.  The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J S Mandel; T R Church; J H Bond; F Ederer; M S Geisser; S J Mongin; D C Snover; L M Schuman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Which colon cancer screening test? A comparison of costs, effectiveness, and compliance.

Authors:  S Vijan; E W Hwang; T P Hofer; R A Hayward
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 3.  Overview of the epidemiology of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A B Wilmink
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Using colonoscopy to screen for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D F Ransohoff; C A Lang
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Experience of 1446 rectal cancer patients in Korea and analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  Y J Park; E G Youk; H S Choi; S U Han; K J Park; K U Lee; K J Choe; J G Park
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon.

Authors:  D A Lieberman; D G Weiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. Also: update 2001--testing for early lung cancer detection.

Authors:  R A Smith; A C von Eschenbach; R Wender; B Levin; T Byers; D Rothenberger; D Brooks; W Creasman; C Cohen; C Runowicz; D Saslow; V Cokkinides; H Eyre
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Comparative screening with a sensitive guaiac and specific immunochemical occult blood test in an endoscopic study.

Authors:  P Rozen; J Knaani; Z Samuel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; J Olsen; O D Jørgensen; O Søndergaard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  17 in total

1.  Performance of the fecal immunochemical test is not decreased by high ambient temperature in the rapid return system.

Authors:  Jae Myung Cha; Joung Il Lee; Kwang Ro Joo; Hyun Phil Shin; Jae Jun Park; Jung Won Jeun; Jun Uk Lim; Sang-Hyun Hwang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Accuracy of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Lee; Elizabeth G Liles; Stephen Bent; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Clinical features of colorectal cancer detected by the national cancer screening program.

Authors:  Dae-Do Park; Rumi Shin; Ji-Sun Kim; Heung-Kwon Oh; Seung-Yong Jeong; Kyu Joo Park; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2010-12-31

Review 4.  Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.

Authors:  Esmée J Grobbee; Pieter Ha Wisse; Eline H Schreuders; Aafke van Roon; Leonie van Dam; Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Wichor Bramer; Sarah Berhane; Jonathan J Deeks; Ewout W Steyerberg; Monique E van Leerdam; Manon Cw Spaander; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-06-06

Review 5.  Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson; Jeffrey K Lee; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Use of a low cut-off value for the fecal immunochemical test enables better detection of proximal neoplasia.

Authors:  Jae Myung Cha; Joung Il Lee; Kwang Ro Joo; Hyun Phil Shin; Jung Won Jeun; Jun Uk Lim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  An enrichment model using regular health examination data for early detection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Qiang Shi; Zhaoya Gao; Pengze Wu; Fanxiu Heng; Fuming Lei; Yanzhao Wang; Qingkun Gao; Qingmin Zeng; Pengfei Niu; Cheng Li; Jin Gu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Effect of Sex, Age, and Positivity Threshold on Fecal Immunochemical Test Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Emma H Levine; Cecilia Doan; Anton Gies; Hermann Brenner; Charles Quesenberry; Jeffrey K Lee; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Change to FIT increased CRC screening rates: evaluation of a US screening outreach program.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Liles; Nancy Perrin; Ana Gabriela Rosales; Adrianne C Feldstein; David H Smith; David M Mosen; Jennifer L Schneider
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Cutoff value determines the performance of a semi-quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood test in a colorectal cancer screening programme.

Authors:  L G M van Rossum; A F van Rijn; R J F Laheij; M G H van Oijen; P Fockens; J B M J Jansen; A L M Verbeek; E Dekker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.