Literature DB >> 19955575

Employment status and the risk of pregnancy complications: the Generation R Study.

Pauline W Jansen1, Henning Tiemeier, Frank C Verhulst, Alex Burdorf, Vincent W V Jaddoe, Albert Hofman, Henriëtte A Moll, Bero O Verburg, Eric A P Steegers, Johan P Mackenbach, Hein Raat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study explored the relationships of employment status, type of unemployment and number of weekly working hours, with a wide range of pregnancy outcomes.
METHODS: Information on employment characteristics and pregnancy outcomes was available for 6111 pregnant women enrolled in a population-based cohort study in the Netherlands.
RESULTS: After adjustment for confounders, there were no statistically significant differences in risks of pregnancy complications between employed and unemployed women. Among unemployed women, women receiving disability benefit had an increased risk of preterm ruptured membranes (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.49 to 6.70), elective caesarean section (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.21 to 7.34) and preterm birth (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.32 to 5.28) compared to housewives. Offspring of students and women receiving disability benefit had a significantly lower mean birth weight than offspring of housewives (difference: -93, 95% CI -174 to -12; and -97, 95% CI -190 to -5, respectively). In employed women, long working hours (>or=40 h/week) were associated with a decrease of 45 g in offspring's mean birth weight (adjusted analysis; 95% CI -89 to -1) compared with 1-24 h/weekly working hours.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no indications that paid employment during pregnancy effects the health of the mother and child. However, among unemployed and employed women, women receiving disability benefit, students and women with long working hours during pregnancy were at risk for some adverse pregnancy outcomes. More research is needed to replicate these results and explain these findings. Meanwhile, prenatal care providers should be made aware of the risks associated with specific types of unemployment and long working hours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19955575     DOI: 10.1136/oem.2009.046300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  13 in total

Review 1.  Physically demanding work and preterm delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M D M van Beukering; M J G J van Melick; B W Mol; M H W Frings-Dresen; C T J Hulshof
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Shift work, long working hours and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M J G J van Melick; M D M van Beukering; B W Mol; M H W Frings-Dresen; C T J Hulshof
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 3.  Work activities and risk of prematurity, low birth weight and pre-eclampsia: an updated review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Keith T Palmer; Matteo Bonzini; E Clare Harris; Cathy Linaker; Jens Peter Bonde
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Reevaluating the relationship between prenatal employment and birth outcomes: a policy-relevant application of propensity score matching.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Laura B Attanasio; Patricia M McGovern; Dwenda K Gjerdingen; Pamela Jo Johnson
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2012-12-21

5.  The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2010.

Authors:  Vincent W V Jaddoe; Cock M van Duijn; Albert J van der Heijden; Johan P Mackenbach; Henriëtte A Moll; Eric A P Steegers; Henning Tiemeier; Andre G Uitterlinden; Frank C Verhulst; Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Occupational exposure to chemicals and fetal growth: the Generation R Study.

Authors:  Claudia A Snijder; Nel Roeleveld; Egbert Te Velde; Eric A P Steegers; Hein Raat; Albert Hofman; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Work-related maternal risk factors and the risk of pregnancy induced hypertension and preeclampsia during pregnancy. The Generation R Study.

Authors:  Jaap Jan Nugteren; Claudia A Snijder; Albert Hofman; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Eric A P Steegers; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prevalence of hypertension in pregnancy and its associated factors among women attending antenatal clinics in Bengaluru.

Authors:  Anita Nath; B Sheeba; Raj Sisira; Chandra S Metgud
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-04-29

9.  Risk factors for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a report from the maroua regional hospital, cameroon.

Authors:  Pierre Marie Tebeu; Pascal Foumane; Robinson Mbu; Gisèle Fosso; Paul Tjek Biyaga; Joseph Nelson Fomulu
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2011-07

10.  Low birth weight, small for gestational age and preterm births before and after the economic collapse in Iceland: a population based cohort study.

Authors:  Védís Helga Eiríksdóttir; Tinna Laufey Ásgeirsdóttir; Ragnheiður Ingibjörg Bjarnadóttir; Robert Kaestner; Sven Cnattingius; Unnur Anna Valdimarsdóttir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.