PURPOSE: Specific physical activities or working conditions are suspected for increasing the risk of preterm birth (PTB). The aim of this meta-analysis is to review and summarize the pre-existing evidence on the effect of shift work or long working hours on the risk of PTB. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE and EMBASE (1990-2013) for observational and intervention studies with original data. We only included articles that met our specific criteria for language, exposure, outcome, data collection and original data that were of at least of moderate quality. The data of the included studies were pooled. RESULTS: Eight high-quality studies and eight moderate-quality studies were included in the meta-analysis. In these studies, no clear or statistically significant relationship between shift work and PTB was found. The summary estimate OR for performing shift work during pregnancy and the risk of PTB were 1.04 (95% CI 0.90-1.20). For long working hours during pregnancy, the summary estimate OR was 1.25 (95% CI 1.01-1.54), indicating a marginally statistically significant relationship but an only slightly elevated risk. CONCLUSION: Although in many of the included studies a positive association between long working hours and PTB was seen this did reach only marginal statistical significance. In the studies included in this review, working in shifts or in night shifts during pregnancy was not significantly associated with an increased risk for PTB. For both risk factors, due to the lack of high-quality studies focusing on the risks per trimester, in particular the third trimester, a firm conclusion about an association cannot be stated.
PURPOSE: Specific physical activities or working conditions are suspected for increasing the risk of preterm birth (PTB). The aim of this meta-analysis is to review and summarize the pre-existing evidence on the effect of shift work or long working hours on the risk of PTB. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE and EMBASE (1990-2013) for observational and intervention studies with original data. We only included articles that met our specific criteria for language, exposure, outcome, data collection and original data that were of at least of moderate quality. The data of the included studies were pooled. RESULTS: Eight high-quality studies and eight moderate-quality studies were included in the meta-analysis. In these studies, no clear or statistically significant relationship between shift work and PTB was found. The summary estimate OR for performing shift work during pregnancy and the risk of PTB were 1.04 (95% CI 0.90-1.20). For long working hours during pregnancy, the summary estimate OR was 1.25 (95% CI 1.01-1.54), indicating a marginally statistically significant relationship but an only slightly elevated risk. CONCLUSION: Although in many of the included studies a positive association between long working hours and PTB was seen this did reach only marginal statistical significance. In the studies included in this review, working in shifts or in night shifts during pregnancy was not significantly associated with an increased risk for PTB. For both risk factors, due to the lack of high-quality studies focusing on the risks per trimester, in particular the third trimester, a firm conclusion about an association cannot be stated.
Authors: Kathryn L Gatford; David J Kennaway; Hong Liu; David O Kleemann; Timothy R Kuchel; Tamara J Varcoe Journal: J Physiol Date: 2019-02-10 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Alison K Nulty; Marit L Bovbjerg; David A Savitz; Amy H Herring; Chyrise B Bradley; Kelly R Evenson Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2022-01-08
Authors: Todd R Sponholtz; Traci N Bethea; Edward A Ruiz-Narváez; Renee Boynton-Jarrett; Julie R Palmer; Lynn Rosenberg; Lauren A Wise Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Francesca L Facco; Corette B Parker; Shannon Hunter; Kathryn J Reid; Phyllis P Zee; Robert M Silver; Grace Pien; Judith H Chung; Judette M Louis; David M Haas; Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Hyagriv N Simhan; Samuel Parry; Ronald J Wapner; George R Saade; Brian M Mercer; Melissa Bickus; Uma M Reddy; William A Grobman Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM Date: 2019-09-09
Authors: Katriina Heikkila; Solja T Nyberg; Ida E H Madsen; Ernest de Vroome; Lars Alfredsson; Jacob J Bjorner; Marianne Borritz; Hermann Burr; Raimund Erbel; Jane E Ferrie; Eleonor I Fransson; Goedele A Geuskens; Wendela E Hooftman; Irene L Houtman; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Anders Knutsson; Markku Koskenvuo; Thorsten Lunau; Martin L Nielsen; Maria Nordin; Tuula Oksanen; Jan H Pejtersen; Jaana Pentti; Martin J Shipley; Andrew Steptoe; Sakari B Suominen; Töres Theorell; Jussi Vahtera; Peter J M Westerholm; Hugo Westerlund; Nico Dragano; Reiner Rugulies; Ichiro Kawachi; G David Batty; Archana Singh-Manoux; Marianna Virtanen; Mika Kivimäki Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Susanne Strohmaier; Elizabeth E Devore; Celine Vetter; Stacey Missmer; A Heather Eliassen; Bernard Rosner; Janet Rich-Edwards; Alison E Field; Eva S Schernhammer Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 5.002