Literature DB >> 19955285

Nanostimulation: manipulation of single neuron activity by juxtacellular current injection.

Arthur R Houweling1, Guy Doron, Birgit C Voigt, Lucas J Herfst, Michael Brecht.   

Abstract

In the mammalian brain, many thousands of single-neuron recording studies have been performed but less than 10 single-cell stimulation studies. This paucity of single-cell stimulation data reflects a lack of easily applicable single-cell stimulation techniques. We provide a detailed description of the procedures involved in nanostimulation, a single-cell stimulation method derived from the juxtacellular labeling technique. Nanostimulation is easy to apply and can be directed to a wide variety of identifiable neurons in anesthetized and awake animals. We describe the recording approach and the parameters of the electric configuration underlying nanostimulation. We use glass pipettes with a DC resistance of 4-7 Mohms. Obtaining the juxtacellular configuration requires a close contact between pipette tip and neuron and is associated with a several-fold increase in resistance to values > or = 20 Mohms. The recorded action potential (AP) amplitude grows to > or = 2 mV, and neurons can be activated with currents in the nanoampere range--hence the term nanostimulation. While exact AP timing has not been achieved, AP frequency and AP number can be parametrically controlled. We demonstrate that nanostimulation can also be used to selectively inhibit sensory responses in identifiable neurons. Nanostimulation is biophysically similar to electroporation, and based on this assumption, we argue that nanostimulation operates on membranes in the micrometer area directly below the pipette tip, where membrane pores are induced by high transmembrane voltage. There is strong evidence to suggest that nanostimulation selectively activates single neurons and that the evoked effects are cell-specific. Nanostimulation therefore holds great potential for elucidating how single neurons contribute to behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19955285     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00421.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  Friction-based stabilization of juxtacellular recordings in freely moving rats.

Authors:  Lucas Herfst; Andrea Burgalossi; Kurt Haskic; John J Tukker; Martin Schmidt; Michael Brecht
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Insights into cortical mechanisms of behavior from microstimulation experiments.

Authors:  Mark H Histed; Amy M Ni; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 3.  What single-cell stimulation has told us about neural coding.

Authors:  Guy Doron; Michael Brecht
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Functional coupling from simple to complex cells in the visually driven cortical circuit.

Authors:  Jianing Yu; David Ferster
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Probing neural circuitry and function with electrical microstimulation.

Authors:  Kelsey L Clark; Katherine M Armstrong; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Temporally precise control of single-neuron spiking by juxtacellular nanostimulation.

Authors:  Maik C Stüttgen; Lourens J P Nonkes; H Rüdiger A P Geis; Paul H Tiesinga; Arthur R Houweling
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Large-scale analysis reveals populational contributions of cortical spike rate and synchrony to behavioural functions.

Authors:  Rie Kimura; Akiko Saiki; Yoko Fujiwara-Tsukamoto; Yutaka Sakai; Yoshikazu Isomura
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Representation of egomotion in rat's trident and E-row whisker cortices.

Authors:  Edith Chorev; Patricia Preston-Ferrer; Michael Brecht
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Testing the Efficacy of Single-Cell Stimulation in Biasing Presubicular Head Direction Activity.

Authors:  Stefano Coletta; Markus Frey; Khaled Nasr; Patricia Preston-Ferrer; Andrea Burgalossi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Single-Cell Stimulation in Barrel Cortex Influences Psychophysical Detection Performance.

Authors:  Nouk Tanke; J Gerard G Borst; Arthur R Houweling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.