Literature DB >> 26240419

What single-cell stimulation has told us about neural coding.

Guy Doron1, Michael Brecht2.   

Abstract

In recent years, single-cell stimulation experiments have resulted in substantial progress towards directly linking single-cell activity to movement and sensation. Recent advances in electrical recording and stimulation techniques have enabled control of single neuron spiking in vivo and have contributed to our understanding of neuronal coding schemes in the brain. Here, we review single neuron stimulation effects in different brain structures and how they vary with artificially inserted spike patterns. We briefly compare single neuron stimulation with other brain stimulation techniques. A key advantage of single neuron stimulation is the precise control of the evoked spiking patterns. Systematically varying spike patterns and measuring evoked movements and sensations enables 'decoding' of the single-cell spike patterns and provides insights into the readout mechanisms of sensory and motor cortical spikes.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  motor control; nanostimulation; patch clamp; sensation; single neuron

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26240419      PMCID: PMC4528816          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  120 in total

1.  Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of precentral cortex.

Authors:  Michael S A Graziano; Charlotte S R Taylor; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Whisker movements evoked by stimulation of single motor neurons in the facial nucleus of the rat.

Authors:  Lucas J Herfst; Michael Brecht
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Population imaging of ongoing neuronal activity in the visual cortex of awake rats.

Authors:  David S Greenberg; Arthur R Houweling; Jason N D Kerr
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Spiking irregularity and frequency modulate the behavioral report of single-neuron stimulation.

Authors:  Guy Doron; Moritz von Heimendahl; Peter Schlattmann; Arthur R Houweling; Michael Brecht
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Differences in excitability of cortical neurons as a function of motor projection in conditioned cats.

Authors:  C D Woody; P Black-Cleworth
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Optogenetic and electrical microstimulation systematically bias visuospatial choice in primates.

Authors:  Ji Dai; Daniel I Brooks; David L Sheinberg
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects of varying pulse amplitude and frequency.

Authors:  C M Murasugi; C D Salzman; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches.

Authors:  O P Hamill; A Marty; E Neher; B Sakmann; F J Sigworth
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.657

9.  Changes in excitability to weak-intensity extracellular electrical stimulation of units of pericruciate cortex in cats.

Authors:  J F Brons; C D Woody; N Allon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task.

Authors:  Timothy D Hanks; Jochen Ditterich; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-09       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  10 in total

1.  Amplitude modulations of cortical sensory responses in pulsatile evidence accumulation.

Authors:  Sue Ann Koay; Stephan Thiberge; Carlos D Brody; David W Tank
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Butterflies and the brain.

Authors:  Andreas Draguhn
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  A null model for cortical representations with grandmothers galore.

Authors:  Gabriel Kreiman
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  A network model of the barrel cortex combined with a differentiator detector reproduces features of the behavioral response to single-neuron stimulation.

Authors:  Davide Bernardi; Guy Doron; Michael Brecht; Benjamin Lindner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  High-Precision Fast-Spiking Basket Cell Discharges during Complex Events in the Human Neocortex.

Authors:  Viktor Szegedi; Gábor Molnár; Melinda Paizs; Eszter Csakvari; Pál Barzó; Gábor Tamás; Karri Lamsa
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-10-13

6.  Biophysically grounded mean-field models of neural populations under electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Caglar Cakan; Klaus Obermayer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Distributed interfacing by nanoscale photodiodes enables single-neuron light activation and sensory enhancement in 3D spinal explants.

Authors:  Agnes Thalhammer; Mario Fontanini; Jiuyun Shi; Denis Scaini; Luca Recupero; Alexander Evtushenko; Ying Fu; Suraj Pavagada; Andrea Bistrovic-Popov; Ljiljana Fruk; Bozhi Tian; Laura Ballerini
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 14.957

8.  Understanding the brain by controlling neural activity.

Authors:  Kristine Krug; C Daniel Salzman; Scott Waddell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Optogenetic control of mesenchymal cell fate towards precise bone regeneration.

Authors:  Weicai Wang; Delan Huang; Jianhan Ren; Runze Li; Zhicai Feng; Chenyu Guan; Baicheng Bao; Bin Cai; Junqi Ling; Chen Zhou
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Probing regional cortical excitability via input-output properties using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography coupling.

Authors:  Estelle Raffin; Sylvain Harquel; Brice Passera; Alan Chauvin; Thierry Bougerol; Olivier David
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 5.038

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.