| Literature DB >> 19954515 |
William Kudzi1, Alexander No Dodoo, Jeremy J Mills.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetic influences on drug efficacy and tolerability are now widely known. Pharmacogenetics has thus become an expanding field with great potential for improving drug efficacy and reducing toxicity. Many pharmacologically-relevant polymorphisms do show variability among different populations. Knowledge of allelic frequency distribution within specified populations can be useful in explaining therapeutic failures, identifying potential risk groups for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and optimising doses for therapeutic efficacy. We sought to determine the prevalence of clinically relevant Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 variants in Ghanaians. We compared the data with other ethnic groups and further investigated intra country differences within the Ghanaian population to determine its value to pharmacogenetics studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19954515 PMCID: PMC3224726 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-10-124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Allele and Genotype frequencies for CYP2C8, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 alleles observed in the Ghanaian population (%, 95% CI in parenthesis)
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total no. genotyped | 203 | 195 | 169 |
| Major allele homozygous | 139 (68, 62.0 - 74.86) | 190 (97.5, 95.22 - 99.66) | 152 (90, 85.48 - 94.52) |
| Heterozygous | 59 (29, 22.8 - 35.31) | 4 (2, 0.06 - 4.04) | 14 (8, 3.91, 12.09) |
| Minor allele homozygous | 5 (3, 0.33 - 4.59) | 1 (0.5, -0.49 - 1.51) | 3 (2, -0.21, 3.77) |
| Major allele frequency | 83 (79.35 - 86.65) | 98 (96.61- 99.39) | 94 (91.47- 96.53) |
| Minor allele frequency | 17(13.35 - 20.65) | 2 (0.61, 3.39) | 6 (3.47, 8.53) |
CI, Confidence Interval. CYP2C8*3, *4, CYP2C9*2, *3 *4, *5 and CYP2C19*3 variant alleles were not detected in this study
Analysis of linkage disequilibrium for a set of 10 SNPs in CYP2C locus in a Ghanaian population.
| CYP2C8*2 | CYP2C8*3 | CYP2C8*4 | CYP2C9*2 | CYP2C9*3 | CYP2C9*4 | CYP2C9*5 | CYP2C9*11 | CYP2C19*2 | CYP2C19*3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYP2C8*2 | ||||||||||
| CYP2C8*3 | 0 | |||||||||
| CYP2C8*4 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| CYP2C9*2 | 0.00001459 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| CYP2C9*3 | 0.0008986 | 0 | 0 | 0.0402 | ||||||
| CYP2C9*4 | 0.0008986 | 0 | 0 | 0.0402 | ||||||
| CYP2C9*5 | 0.0008986 | 0 | 0 | 0.0402 | ||||||
| CYP2C9*11 | 0.001332 | 0 | 0 | 0.002015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| CYP2C19*2 | 0.0134 | 0 | 0 | 0.0209 | 0.003165 | 0.003165 | 0.003165 | 0.001274 | ||
| CYP2C19*3 | 0.00342 | 0 | 0 | 0.2237 | 0.1631 | 0.1631 | 0.1631 | 0.003538 | 0.0121 |
Pairwise LD represented as r2 (from 0 to 1) is expressed in each cell. SNPs with strong linkage disequilibrium are highlighted in gray
Allele frequencies of CYP2C8, CYP2C19 and CYP2C19 variants in a Ghanaian and other previously studied populations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ghanaian | 0.17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0 |
| Ghanaian | 0.17 [ | 0 [ | 0 [ | |||||||
| Zanzibaris | 0.14 [ | 0.02 [ | 0.006 [ | |||||||
| Burkinabe | 0.115 [ | 0.004 [ | 0 [ | |||||||
| Beninese | 0 [ | 0 [ | 0 [ | 0.02 [ | 0.03 [ | 0.13 [ | 0[ | |||
| Ethiopian | 0.043 [ | 0.023 [ | 0 [ | |||||||
| Zimbabweam | 0.13 [ | 0[ | ||||||||
| African American | 0.18 [ | 0.02 [ | 0.033 [ | 0.023 [ | 0 [ | 0.01 [ | 0.02 [ | 0.25 [ | 0 [ | |
| 0 - 0.004 [ | 0.095 - 0.17 [ | 0 - 0.075 [ | 0.08 - 0.191 [ | 0.03 - 0.17 [ | 0 - 0.004 [ | 0 [ | 0.09 [ | 0 | ||
| 0 [ | 0 [ | 0 [ | 0 - 0.001 [ | 0.011 - 0.068 [ | 0.23 [ | 0.085 [ |
§ The lowest and the highest allele frequencies for Caucasian and Asian populations