AIMS: To investigate the distribution of cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) and 2C19 (CYP2C19) genotype frequencies in the Beninese and Belgian Caucasian populations. METHODS: Beninese (n = 111) and Belgian (n = 121) were genotyped for CYP2C9*2, *3, *4, *5, and *11 as well as for CYP2C19*2 and*3. RESULTS: The distribution of alleles was: CYP2C9*1: 95.5 vs. 82.2% (P < 0.001); CYP2C9*2: 0 vs. 10% (P < 0.001); CYP2C9*3: 0 vs. 7.4% (P < 0.01); CYP2C9*4: both 0%; CYP2C9*5: 1.8 vs. 0% (P = 0.05); and CYP2C9*11: 2.7 vs. 0.4% (P < 0.05). The frequencies of the CYP2C19*2 allele were 13 vs. 9.1%, respectively. CYP2C19*3 was not detected in either population. The 95% confidence intervals for the differences of frequencies of CYP2C9*1, CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3, CYP2C9*4, CYP2C9*5, CYP2C9*11, CYP2C19*1, CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 between Belgian and Beninese were 7%, 19%; - 14%, - 6%; - 11%, - 4%; - 1%, 1%; 0%, 4%; 0%, 5%; - 10%, 2%; - 2%, 10%; - 1%; respectively. The distributions of CYP2C9 genotypes in the Beninese and Belgian individuals were: CYP2C9*1/*1: 91 vs. 67% (P < 0.00001); CYP2C9*1/*2: 0 vs. 18.2% (P < 0.0001); CYP2C9*1/*3: 0 vs. 11.6% (P < 0.001); CYP2C9*1/*5: 3.6 vs. 0% (P = 0.05); CYP2C9*1/*11: 5.4 vs. 0.8% (P = 0.05); CYP2C9*2/*3: 0 vs. 1.6% (NS); CYP2C9*3/*3: 0 vs. 0.8% (NS). The distributions of CYP2C19 genotypes between these ethnic groups were: CYP2C19*1/*1: 73.9 vs. 83.5% (NS); CYP2C19*1/*2: 26.1 vs. 14.9% (P < 0.05); CYP2C9*2/*2: 0 vs. 1.6% (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Differences of allele frequencies between Beninese and Belgian populations were statistically significant for CYP2C9*2, *3, *5 and *11, but not for CYP2C9*4 or for CYP2C19*2 and *3.
AIMS: To investigate the distribution of cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) and 2C19 (CYP2C19) genotype frequencies in the Beninese and Belgian Caucasian populations. METHODS: Beninese (n = 111) and Belgian (n = 121) were genotyped for CYP2C9*2, *3, *4, *5, and *11 as well as for CYP2C19*2 and*3. RESULTS: The distribution of alleles was: CYP2C9*1: 95.5 vs. 82.2% (P < 0.001); CYP2C9*2: 0 vs. 10% (P < 0.001); CYP2C9*3: 0 vs. 7.4% (P < 0.01); CYP2C9*4: both 0%; CYP2C9*5: 1.8 vs. 0% (P = 0.05); and CYP2C9*11: 2.7 vs. 0.4% (P < 0.05). The frequencies of the CYP2C19*2 allele were 13 vs. 9.1%, respectively. CYP2C19*3 was not detected in either population. The 95% confidence intervals for the differences of frequencies of CYP2C9*1, CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3, CYP2C9*4, CYP2C9*5, CYP2C9*11, CYP2C19*1, CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 between Belgian and Beninese were 7%, 19%; - 14%, - 6%; - 11%, - 4%; - 1%, 1%; 0%, 4%; 0%, 5%; - 10%, 2%; - 2%, 10%; - 1%; respectively. The distributions of CYP2C9 genotypes in the Beninese and Belgian individuals were: CYP2C9*1/*1: 91 vs. 67% (P < 0.00001); CYP2C9*1/*2: 0 vs. 18.2% (P < 0.0001); CYP2C9*1/*3: 0 vs. 11.6% (P < 0.001); CYP2C9*1/*5: 3.6 vs. 0% (P = 0.05); CYP2C9*1/*11: 5.4 vs. 0.8% (P = 0.05); CYP2C9*2/*3: 0 vs. 1.6% (NS); CYP2C9*3/*3: 0 vs. 0.8% (NS). The distributions of CYP2C19 genotypes between these ethnic groups were: CYP2C19*1/*1: 73.9 vs. 83.5% (NS); CYP2C19*1/*2: 26.1 vs. 14.9% (P < 0.05); CYP2C9*2/*2: 0 vs. 1.6% (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Differences of allele frequencies between Beninese and Belgian populations were statistically significant for CYP2C9*2, *3, *5 and *11, but not for CYP2C9*4 or for CYP2C19*2 and *3.
Authors: L J Dickmann; A E Rettie; M B Kneller; R B Kim; A J Wood; C M Stein; G R Wilkinson; U I Schwarz Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: J Imai; I Ieiri; K Mamiya; S Miyahara; H Furuumi; E Nanba; M Yamane; Y Fukumaki; H Ninomiya; N Tashiro; K Otsubo; S Higuchi Journal: Pharmacogenetics Date: 2000-02
Authors: C Dandara; C M Masimirembwa; A Magimba; J Sayi; S Kaaya; D K Sommers; J R Snyman; J A Hasler Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: A Gaedigk; W L Casley; R F Tyndale; E M Sellers; M Jurima-Romet; J S Leeder Journal: Can J Physiol Pharmacol Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 2.273
Authors: G C Ibeanu; J A Goldstein; U Meyer; S Benhamou; C Bouchardy; P Dayer; B I Ghanayem; J Blaisdell Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: I Fricke-Galindo; C Céspedes-Garro; F Rodrigues-Soares; M E G Naranjo; Á Delgado; F de Andrés; M López-López; E Peñas-Lledó; A LLerena Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: I Cavaco; J Strömberg-Nörklit; A Kaneko; M I Msellem; M Dahoma; V L Ribeiro; A Bjorkman; J P Gil Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2005-01-27 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Ramatoulie E Janha; Fatoumatta Sisay-Joof; Majidah Hamid-Adiamoh; Archibald Worwui; Hannah L Chapman; Hyginus Opara; Sam Dunyo; Paul Milligan; Kirk Rockett; Peter Winstanley; Munir Pirmohamed; Ann K Miller; David J Conway; Robert T Walton Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 2.533