Literature DB >> 16222248

Chromosome nondisjunction yields tetraploid rather than aneuploid cells in human cell lines.

Qinghua Shi1, Randall W King.   

Abstract

Although mutations in cell cycle regulators or spindle proteins can perturb chromosome segregation, the causes and consequences of spontaneous mitotic chromosome nondisjunction in human cells are not well understood. It has been assumed that nondisjunction of a chromosome during mitosis will yield two aneuploid daughter cells. Here we show that chromosome nondisjunction is tightly coupled to regulation of cytokinesis in human cell lines, such that nondisjunction results in the formation of tetraploid rather than aneuploid cells. We observed that spontaneously arising binucleated cells exhibited chromosome mis-segregation rates up to 166-fold higher than the overall mitotic population. Long-term imaging experiments indicated that most binucleated cells arose through a bipolar mitosis followed by regression of the cleavage furrow hours later. Nondisjunction occurred with high frequency in cells that became binucleated by furrow regression, but not in cells that completed cytokinesis to form two mononucleated cells. Our findings indicate that nondisjunction does not directly yield aneuploid cells, but rather tetraploid cells that may subsequently become aneuploid through further division. The coupling of spontaneous segregation errors to furrow regression provides a potential explanation for the prevalence of hyperdiploid chromosome number and centrosome amplification observed in many cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16222248     DOI: 10.1038/nature03958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  145 in total

1.  Spontaneous transformation of murine epithelial cells requires the early acquisition of specific chromosomal aneuploidies and genomic imbalances.

Authors:  Hesed M Padilla-Nash; Karen Hathcock; Nicole E McNeil; David Mack; Daniel Hoeppner; Rea Ravin; Turid Knutsen; Raluca Yonescu; Danny Wangsa; Kathleen Dorritie; Linda Barenboim; Yue Hu; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Escherichia coli induces DNA damage in vivo and triggers genomic instability in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Gabriel Cuevas-Ramos; Claude R Petit; Ingrid Marcq; Michèle Boury; Eric Oswald; Jean-Philippe Nougayrède
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Replication-compromised cells require the mitotic checkpoint to prevent tetraploidization.

Authors:  Zilai Zhang; Sumit Arora; Yanjiao Zhou; Athena Cherry; Teresa S-F Wang
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 4.  Understanding cytokinesis failure.

Authors:  Guillaume Normand; Randall W King
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Persistent telomere damage induces bypass of mitosis and tetraploidy.

Authors:  Teresa Davoli; Eros Lazzerini Denchi; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Illicit survival of cancer cells during polyploidization and depolyploidization.

Authors:  I Vitale; L Galluzzi; L Senovilla; A Criollo; M Jemaà; M Castedo; G Kroemer
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 15.828

7.  Binucleation to breed new plant species adaptable to their environments.

Authors:  Khaled Moustafa
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2015

8.  Cre recombinase induces DNA damage and tetraploidy in the absence of loxP sites.

Authors:  Vaibhao C Janbandhu; Daniel Moik; Reinhard Fässler
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 9.  Polyploidy in liver development, homeostasis and disease.

Authors:  Romain Donne; Maëva Saroul-Aïnama; Pierre Cordier; Séverine Celton-Morizur; Chantal Desdouets
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 46.802

10.  High content flow cytometric micronucleus scoring method is applicable to attachment cell lines.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Jing Shi; John Nicolette; Marilyn Diehl; Paul Sonders; Svetlana Avlasevich; Sarojini Raja; Jeffrey C Bemis; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.