Literature DB >> 19949146

Sex differences in attainment of independent funding by career development awardees.

Reshma Jagsi1, Amy R Motomura, Kent A Griffith, Soumya Rangarajan, Peter A Ubel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised about the career pipeline in academic medicine, including whether women with a demonstrated commitment to research succeed at the same rate as male colleagues.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the subsequent academic success of recipients of National Institutes of Health (NIH) career development awards.
SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: 2784 of 2799 (99.5%) recipients of K08 and K23 awards for whom sex could be ascertained from the NIH Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects database and other publicly available sources. MEASUREMENTS: Actuarial rates at which recipients of K08 and K23 awards from 1997 to 2003 went on to receive R01 awards. Sex-specific rates of R01 award attainment were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method, and sex differences were assessed by using a Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: Overall, 31.4% of the 1919 K08 awardees and 43.7% of the 865 K23 awardees were female (P < 0.001). Women were less likely than men to receive an R01 award (P < 0.001). The actuarial rate of R01 award attainment at 5 years was 22.7% overall, 18.8% among women, and 24.8% among men. At 10 years, the rate was 42.5% overall, 36.2% among women, and 45.6% among men. Sex persisted as an independent significant predictor of R01 award attainment (hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.68 to 0.92]; P = 0.002) in multivariate analysis controlling for K award type, year of award, funding institute, institution, and specialty. LIMITATION: Whether the lower rate of R01 award achievement among women is due to lower rates of application or lower rates of success in application could not be determined.
CONCLUSION: Only a minority of K awardees studied achieved R01 award funding during the period assessed, and a significant sex disparity was evident.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19949146     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-11-200912010-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  72 in total

1.  Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?

Authors:  Anna Kaatz; You-Geon Lee; Aaron Potvien; Wairimu Magua; Amarette Filut; Anupama Bhattacharya; Renee Leatherberry; Xiaojin Zhu; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Prevalence and predictors of US medical graduates' federal F32, mentored-K, and R01 awards: a national cohort study.

Authors:  Donna B Jeffe; Dorothy A Andriole
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Evaluation of VA Women's Health Fellowships: developing leaders in academic women's health.

Authors:  Sarah A Tilstra; Kevin L Kraemer; Doris M Rubio; Melissa A McNeil
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Parental Leave, Lactation, and Childcare Policies at Top US Schools of Public Health.

Authors:  Stephanie Morain; Lauren Schoen; Makenna Marty; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Comparison of National Institutes of Health Grant Amounts to First-Time Male and Female Principal Investigators.

Authors:  Diego F M Oliveira; Yifang Ma; Teresa K Woodruff; Brian Uzzi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Gender Differences in Receipt of National Institutes of Health R01 Grants Among Junior Faculty at an Academic Medical Center: The Role of Connectivity, Rank, and Research Productivity.

Authors:  Erica T Warner; René Carapinha; Griffin M Weber; Emorcia V Hill; Joan Y Reede
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Success in Attaining Independent Funding Among National Institutes of Health K Grant Awardees in Ophthalmology: An Extended Follow-up.

Authors:  Nicholas J Protopsaltis; Allison J Chen; Vicky Hwang; Steven J Gedde; Daniel L Chao
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 7.389

8.  Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons Achieve High Rates of K Award Conversion Into R01 Funding.

Authors:  Adishesh K Narahari; J Hunter Mehaffey; Robert B Hawkins; Pranav K Baderdinni; Anirudha S Chandrabhatla; Curtis G Tribble; Irving L Kron; Mark E Roeser; Dustin M Walters; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Batting 300 is good: perspectives of faculty researchers and their mentors on rejection, resilience, and persistence in academic medical careers.

Authors:  Rochelle DeCastro; Dana Sambuco; Peter A Ubel; Abigail Stewart; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Negotiation in academic medicine: narratives of faculty researchers and their mentors.

Authors:  Dana Sambuco; Agata Dabrowska; Rochelle Decastro; Abigail Stewart; Peter A Ubel; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.