Literature DB >> 28771391

Gender Differences in Receipt of National Institutes of Health R01 Grants Among Junior Faculty at an Academic Medical Center: The Role of Connectivity, Rank, and Research Productivity.

Erica T Warner1,2, René Carapinha3,4, Griffin M Weber5,6, Emorcia V Hill3, Joan Y Reede1,3,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there were gender differences in likelihood of receiving a first National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 award among 5445 instructors and assistant professors at Harvard Medical School (HMS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on R01 award principal investigators were obtained from NIH ExPORTER and linked with faculty data. Using Cox proportional hazard regression, we examined the association of gender with receipt of first R01 award between 2008 and 2015 accounting for demographics, research productivity metrics, and professional characteristics.
RESULTS: Compared to males, females had fewer publications, lower h-index, smaller coauthor networks and were less likely to be assistant professors (p < 0.0001). Four hundred and thirteen of 5445 faculty (7.6%) received their first R01 award during the study period. There was no gender difference in receipt of R01 awards in age-adjusted (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-1.08) or multivariable-adjusted models (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.86-1.34). Compared to white males, there was a nonsignificant 10%, 18%, and 30% lower rate of R01 receipt among white, Asian or Pacific Islander, and underrepresented minority females, respectively. These differences were eliminated in the multivariable-adjusted model. Network reach, age, HMS start year, h-index, academic rank, previous K award, terminal degree, and HMS training were all significant predictors of receiving an R01 award.
CONCLUSIONS: A relatively small proportion of HMS junior faculty obtained their first NIH R01 award during the study period. There was no significant gender difference in likelihood of award. However, we are unable to distinguish faculty that never applied from those who applied and were not successful.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NIH grants; R01; gender

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28771391      PMCID: PMC5651959          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  29 in total

1.  Separate and equitable promotion tracks for clinician-educators.

Authors:  Victoria Manion Fleming; Nancy Schindler; Gary J Martin; Debra A DaRosa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Gender distribution of U.S. medical school faculty by academic track type.

Authors:  Anita P Mayer; Janis E Blair; Marcia G Ko; Sharonne N Hayes; Yu-Hui H Chang; Suzanne L Caubet; Julia A Files
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?

Authors:  Anna Kaatz; You-Geon Lee; Aaron Potvien; Wairimu Magua; Amarette Filut; Anupama Bhattacharya; Renee Leatherberry; Xiaojin Zhu; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Faculty Promotion and Attrition: The Importance of Coauthor Network Reach at an Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Erica T Warner; René Carapinha; Griffin M Weber; Emorcia V Hill; Joan Y Reede
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Understanding the careers of physician educators in family medicine.

Authors:  D E Simpson; V A Rediske; A Beecher; D Bower; L Meurer; S Lawrence; M Wolkomir
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Sex Differences in Academic Rank in US Medical Schools in 2014.

Authors:  Anupam B Jena; Dhruv Khullar; Oliver Ho; Andrew R Olenski; Daniel M Blumenthal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Gender disparities in research productivity among 9952 academic physicians.

Authors:  Jean Anderson Eloy; Peter F Svider; Deepa V Cherla; Lucia Diaz; Olga Kovalerchik; Kevin M Mauro; Soly Baredes; Sujana S Chandrasekhar
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Gender differences in research grant applications and funding outcomes for medical school faculty.

Authors:  Susan E Waisbren; Hannah Bowles; Tayaba Hasan; Kelly H Zou; S Jean Emans; Carole Goldberg; Sandra Gould; Deborah Levine; Ellice Lieberman; Mary Loeken; Janina Longtine; Carol Nadelson; Andrea Farkas Patenaude; Deborah Quinn; Adrienne G Randolph; Jo M Solet; Nicole Ullrich; Rochelle Walensky; Patricia Weitzman; Helen Christou
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Gender differences in publication productivity, academic position, career duration, and funding among U.S. academic radiation oncology faculty.

Authors:  Emma B Holliday; Reshma Jagsi; Lynn D Wilson; Mehee Choi; Charles R Thomas; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Gendered specialities during medical education: a literature review.

Authors:  Margret Alers; Lotte van Leerdam; Patrick Dielissen; Antoine Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2014-06
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Sayaka Sato; Pascal Mark Gygax; Julian Randall; Marianne Schmid Mast
Journal:  High Educ (Dordr)       Date:  2020-10-03

2.  Representation of Female Faculty at US Medical Schools and Success in Obtaining National Institutes of Health Funding, 2008-2018.

Authors:  Elizabeth Burney Malinzak; Daniel Weikel; Madhav Swaminathan
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

3.  Federal Funding in Emergency Medicine: Demographics and Perspectives of Awardees.

Authors:  Peter R Chai; Stephanie Carreiro; Brittany P Chapman; Edward W Boyer; Kelli N O'Laughlin
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-02-24

4.  Enhancing Recruitment and Retention of Minority Populations for Clinical Research in Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.

Authors:  Neeta Thakur; Stephanie Lovinsky-Desir; Donna Appell; Christian Bime; Lauren Castro; Juan C Celedón; Juliana Ferreira; Maureen George; Yolanda Mageto; Arch G Mainous III; Smita Pakhale; Kristin A Riekert; Jesse Roman; Elizabeth Ruvalcaba; Sunil Sharma; Priya Shete; Juan P Wisnivesky; Fernando Holguin
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 21.405

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.